Zitto Zuberi Kabwe 诉坦桑尼亚联合共和国总统及另外三人案的法律困境：案例说明

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW

African Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1163/17087384-bja10091

Lukiko Vedastus Lukiko, Hassan Kimela

{"title":"Zitto Zuberi Kabwe 诉坦桑尼亚联合共和国总统及另外三人案的法律困境：案例说明","authors":"Lukiko Vedastus Lukiko, Hassan Kimela","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time in Tanzania’s constitutional law jurisprudence, the court delivered judgment against the President on 5 December 2022. The decision was revolutionary as it opened the door for suits to be instituted directly against the President. Despite its jurisprudential significance, the utility of this judgment is washed away by some legal dilemmas that the Court left unaddressed. This case note highlights those dilemmas and their implications.","PeriodicalId":41565,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Dilemmas from Zitto Zuberi Kabwe v The President of the United Republic of Tanzania & Three Others: a Case Note\",\"authors\":\"Lukiko Vedastus Lukiko, Hassan Kimela\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/17087384-bja10091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the first time in Tanzania’s constitutional law jurisprudence, the court delivered judgment against the President on 5 December 2022. The decision was revolutionary as it opened the door for suits to be instituted directly against the President. Despite its jurisprudential significance, the utility of this judgment is washed away by some legal dilemmas that the Court left unaddressed. This case note highlights those dilemmas and their implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-bja10091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-bja10091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 12 月 5 日，坦桑尼亚宪法法院首次做出了不利于总统的判决。这一判决具有革命性意义，因为它开启了直接针对总统提起诉讼的大门。尽管该判决在法理上具有重要意义，但法院未解决的一些法律难题却冲淡了该判决的效用。本案例说明重点介绍了这些难题及其影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Legal Dilemmas from Zitto Zuberi Kabwe v The President of the United Republic of Tanzania & Three Others: a Case Note

For the first time in Tanzania’s constitutional law jurisprudence, the court delivered judgment against the President on 5 December 2022. The decision was revolutionary as it opened the door for suits to be instituted directly against the President. Despite its jurisprudential significance, the utility of this judgment is washed away by some legal dilemmas that the Court left unaddressed. This case note highlights those dilemmas and their implications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

African Journal of Legal Studies LAW-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The African Journal of Legal Studies (AJLS) is a peer-reviewed and interdisciplinary academic journal focusing on human rights and rule of law issues in Africa as analyzed by lawyers, economists, political scientists and others drawn from throughout the continent and the world. The journal, which was established by the Africa Law Institute and is now co-published in collaboration with Brill | Nijhoff, aims to serve as the leading forum for the thoughtful and scholarly engagement of a broad range of complex issues at the intersection of law, public policy and social change in Africa. AJLS places emphasis on presenting a diversity of perspectives on fundamental, long-term, systemic problems of human rights and governance, as well as emerging issues, and possible solutions to them. Towards this end, AJLS encourages critical reflections that are based on empirical observations and experience as well as theoretical and multi-disciplinary approaches.