年轻受试者爬楼梯时下肢生物力学的性别差异

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q2 Engineering
Junghwa Hong, Jun-Young Lee, Hyeon-Soo Shin, Min-Jae Kim, Ju-Hee Kim, Sean Min Lee, Kikwang Lee, Gwang-Moon Eom
{"title":"年轻受试者爬楼梯时下肢生物力学的性别差异","authors":"Junghwa Hong, Jun-Young Lee, Hyeon-Soo Shin, Min-Jae Kim, Ju-Hee Kim, Sean Min Lee, Kikwang Lee, Gwang-Moon Eom","doi":"10.1007/s12541-023-00950-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the biomechanics of lower limb joints during stair ascent, focusing on the distribution of joint loads. Thirty-six young subjects (18 males and 18 females) ascended instrumented stairs while kinematic and kinetic data were measured. Mechanical variables of the lower limb joints and body posture on the sagittal plane were compared between genders, and their associations were also investigated. Female subjects exerted more mechanical work, power, and joint moment than male subjects at the knee joint, while males exerted more at the hip joint. Females and males showed a longer moment arm of ground reaction force at the knee and hip joints, respectively. The moment arm, but not the magnitude, of ground reaction force was strongly associated with the joint moment (r = 0.80–0.97). Females exhibited a more crouched stance limb (lower heel lift, greater ankle dorsiflexion, and knee flexion) than males. A more crouched and extended lower limb posture was found to be correlated with a longer moment arm at the knee and hip joints, respectively. Half of the variance in moment arm could be explained by the heel lift angle. The results indicate that females allocate greater work to the knee joint but less to the hip joint than males do in order to elevate body mass to a higher step during stair ascent. The work distribution strategy appears to be influenced significantly by posture, particularly the choice of foot contact method: heel-toe standing in females and toe standing in males.</p>","PeriodicalId":14359,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Lower Limb Biomechanics During Stair Ascent in Young Subjects\",\"authors\":\"Junghwa Hong, Jun-Young Lee, Hyeon-Soo Shin, Min-Jae Kim, Ju-Hee Kim, Sean Min Lee, Kikwang Lee, Gwang-Moon Eom\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12541-023-00950-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the biomechanics of lower limb joints during stair ascent, focusing on the distribution of joint loads. Thirty-six young subjects (18 males and 18 females) ascended instrumented stairs while kinematic and kinetic data were measured. Mechanical variables of the lower limb joints and body posture on the sagittal plane were compared between genders, and their associations were also investigated. Female subjects exerted more mechanical work, power, and joint moment than male subjects at the knee joint, while males exerted more at the hip joint. Females and males showed a longer moment arm of ground reaction force at the knee and hip joints, respectively. The moment arm, but not the magnitude, of ground reaction force was strongly associated with the joint moment (r = 0.80–0.97). Females exhibited a more crouched stance limb (lower heel lift, greater ankle dorsiflexion, and knee flexion) than males. A more crouched and extended lower limb posture was found to be correlated with a longer moment arm at the knee and hip joints, respectively. Half of the variance in moment arm could be explained by the heel lift angle. The results indicate that females allocate greater work to the knee joint but less to the hip joint than males do in order to elevate body mass to a higher step during stair ascent. The work distribution strategy appears to be influenced significantly by posture, particularly the choice of foot contact method: heel-toe standing in females and toe standing in males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00950-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00950-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查上楼梯时下肢关节生物力学的性别差异,重点关注关节负荷的分布。36 名年轻受试者(18 名男性和 18 名女性)在测量运动学和动力学数据的同时,登上了装有仪器的楼梯。比较了不同性别下肢关节的机械变量和矢状面上的身体姿势,并研究了它们之间的关联。与男性受试者相比,女性受试者在膝关节处做的机械功、力量和关节力矩更大,而男性受试者在髋关节处做的机械功、力量和关节力矩更大。在膝关节和髋关节,女性和男性分别表现出更长的地面反作用力力矩臂。地面反作用力的力矩臂(而非大小)与关节力矩密切相关(r = 0.80-0.97)。与男性相比,女性表现出更多的蹲踞式站姿(脚跟抬高较低、踝关节背屈和膝关节屈曲较大)。研究发现,下肢更多的蹲伏和伸展姿势分别与膝关节和髋关节更长的力矩臂相关。力矩臂变异的一半可以用足跟抬起角度来解释。结果表明,与男性相比,女性为了在上楼梯时将身体质量提升到更高的台阶,会将更多的工作分配到膝关节,而较少的工作分配到髋关节。工作分配策略似乎受到姿势的显著影响,特别是脚接触方式的选择:女性脚跟-脚尖站立,男性脚尖站立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Differences in Lower Limb Biomechanics During Stair Ascent in Young Subjects

The aim of this study was to investigate gender differences in the biomechanics of lower limb joints during stair ascent, focusing on the distribution of joint loads. Thirty-six young subjects (18 males and 18 females) ascended instrumented stairs while kinematic and kinetic data were measured. Mechanical variables of the lower limb joints and body posture on the sagittal plane were compared between genders, and their associations were also investigated. Female subjects exerted more mechanical work, power, and joint moment than male subjects at the knee joint, while males exerted more at the hip joint. Females and males showed a longer moment arm of ground reaction force at the knee and hip joints, respectively. The moment arm, but not the magnitude, of ground reaction force was strongly associated with the joint moment (r = 0.80–0.97). Females exhibited a more crouched stance limb (lower heel lift, greater ankle dorsiflexion, and knee flexion) than males. A more crouched and extended lower limb posture was found to be correlated with a longer moment arm at the knee and hip joints, respectively. Half of the variance in moment arm could be explained by the heel lift angle. The results indicate that females allocate greater work to the knee joint but less to the hip joint than males do in order to elevate body mass to a higher step during stair ascent. The work distribution strategy appears to be influenced significantly by posture, particularly the choice of foot contact method: heel-toe standing in females and toe standing in males.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing accepts original contributions on all aspects of precision engineering and manufacturing. The journal specific focus areas include, but are not limited to: - Precision Machining Processes - Manufacturing Systems - Robotics and Automation - Machine Tools - Design and Materials - Biomechanical Engineering - Nano/Micro Technology - Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing - Measurements and Control Surveys and reviews will also be planned in consultation with the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信