生物工程过敏学中的人与机器:过敏学皮肤点刺试验量化的传统方法与创新方法的比较分析

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Stefano Palazzo, Nada Chaoul, Marcello Albanesi
{"title":"生物工程过敏学中的人与机器:过敏学皮肤点刺试验量化的传统方法与创新方法的比较分析","authors":"Stefano Palazzo, Nada Chaoul, Marcello Albanesi","doi":"10.1007/s40846-024-00856-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Immediate hypersensitivity reactions, commonly triggered by allergens, play a crucial role in clinical allergies. The skin prick test is the primary diagnostic tool for allergy, involving the application of an allergen drop on the forearm's volar surface. A sterile lancet is then used to cross the drop, observing the formation of a wheal if sensitized. In allergy practice, wheals are quantified using an arbitrary visual scale or methods such as the Dermographic Pen Method, involving a dermographic pen and graph paper, or a centimeter ruler. These methodologies are semi-quantitative, time-consuming, and operator-dependent. This study addresses the need for accurate and standardized quantification of SPT responses. We developed a Semi-Automated Method (SAM) for wheal detection to achieve this.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A cohort of 26 patients with respiratory allergies underwent SPTs with various allergens. Wheals were quantified using three methods: Arbitrary Visual Scale (AVSM), DPMM (Dermographic Pen Measurement Method), and the newly developed SAM. SAM utilized photographic detection and image analysis, and calculated major and minor diameters, mean diameter, wheal surface area, and skin index.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Comparative analysis revealed SAM's superior performance in precision and efficiency compared to AVSM and DPMM. Mean surface measurements of histamine-generated wheals using SAM were significantly lower than those obtained with DPMM. Interestingly, SAM consistently demonstrated better performance across all tested allergens.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The introduction of SAM represents a significant advancement in allergy diagnostics. Its semi-automated approach enhances precision and facilitates long-term monitoring of SPT results. Through automation, SAM achieves accuracy in results and ease of use, notably improving allergy diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human vs Machine in Bioengineering Allergology: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional vs Innovative Methods for Quantifying Allergological Skin Prick Tests\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Palazzo, Nada Chaoul, Marcello Albanesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40846-024-00856-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>Immediate hypersensitivity reactions, commonly triggered by allergens, play a crucial role in clinical allergies. The skin prick test is the primary diagnostic tool for allergy, involving the application of an allergen drop on the forearm's volar surface. A sterile lancet is then used to cross the drop, observing the formation of a wheal if sensitized. In allergy practice, wheals are quantified using an arbitrary visual scale or methods such as the Dermographic Pen Method, involving a dermographic pen and graph paper, or a centimeter ruler. These methodologies are semi-quantitative, time-consuming, and operator-dependent. This study addresses the need for accurate and standardized quantification of SPT responses. We developed a Semi-Automated Method (SAM) for wheal detection to achieve this.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A cohort of 26 patients with respiratory allergies underwent SPTs with various allergens. Wheals were quantified using three methods: Arbitrary Visual Scale (AVSM), DPMM (Dermographic Pen Measurement Method), and the newly developed SAM. SAM utilized photographic detection and image analysis, and calculated major and minor diameters, mean diameter, wheal surface area, and skin index.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Comparative analysis revealed SAM's superior performance in precision and efficiency compared to AVSM and DPMM. Mean surface measurements of histamine-generated wheals using SAM were significantly lower than those obtained with DPMM. Interestingly, SAM consistently demonstrated better performance across all tested allergens.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The introduction of SAM represents a significant advancement in allergy diagnostics. Its semi-automated approach enhances precision and facilitates long-term monitoring of SPT results. Through automation, SAM achieves accuracy in results and ease of use, notably improving allergy diagnostics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00856-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00856-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的过敏原通常会引发即刻超敏反应,在临床过敏症中起着至关重要的作用。皮肤点刺试验是诊断过敏症的主要工具,包括在前臂伏面滴上过敏原。然后用无菌柳叶刀穿过液滴,观察是否形成过敏性皮疹。在过敏治疗实践中,喘息的量化方法有任意视觉刻度法、皮肤笔法(包括皮肤笔和图纸)或厘米尺法。这些方法都是半定量的,耗时且依赖于操作者。本研究旨在满足对 SPT 反应进行准确、标准化量化的需求。方法一组 26 名呼吸道过敏患者接受了各种过敏原的 SPT。使用三种方法对乳清进行量化:任意视觉量表 (AVSM)、DPMM(皮肤笔测量法)和新开发的 SAM。结果比较分析表明,与 AVSM 和 DPMM 相比,SAM 在精确度和效率方面都更胜一筹。使用 SAM 测量组胺引起的喘息的平均表面积明显低于使用 DPMM 测量的平均表面积。有趣的是,在所有测试的过敏原中,SAM 始终表现出更好的性能。其半自动化方法提高了精确度,便于对 SPT 结果进行长期监测。通过自动化,SAM 实现了结果的准确性和易用性,显著改善了过敏诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Human vs Machine in Bioengineering Allergology: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional vs Innovative Methods for Quantifying Allergological Skin Prick Tests

Human vs Machine in Bioengineering Allergology: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional vs Innovative Methods for Quantifying Allergological Skin Prick Tests

Purpose

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions, commonly triggered by allergens, play a crucial role in clinical allergies. The skin prick test is the primary diagnostic tool for allergy, involving the application of an allergen drop on the forearm's volar surface. A sterile lancet is then used to cross the drop, observing the formation of a wheal if sensitized. In allergy practice, wheals are quantified using an arbitrary visual scale or methods such as the Dermographic Pen Method, involving a dermographic pen and graph paper, or a centimeter ruler. These methodologies are semi-quantitative, time-consuming, and operator-dependent. This study addresses the need for accurate and standardized quantification of SPT responses. We developed a Semi-Automated Method (SAM) for wheal detection to achieve this.

Methods

A cohort of 26 patients with respiratory allergies underwent SPTs with various allergens. Wheals were quantified using three methods: Arbitrary Visual Scale (AVSM), DPMM (Dermographic Pen Measurement Method), and the newly developed SAM. SAM utilized photographic detection and image analysis, and calculated major and minor diameters, mean diameter, wheal surface area, and skin index.

Results

Comparative analysis revealed SAM's superior performance in precision and efficiency compared to AVSM and DPMM. Mean surface measurements of histamine-generated wheals using SAM were significantly lower than those obtained with DPMM. Interestingly, SAM consistently demonstrated better performance across all tested allergens.

Conclusion

The introduction of SAM represents a significant advancement in allergy diagnostics. Its semi-automated approach enhances precision and facilitates long-term monitoring of SPT results. Through automation, SAM achieves accuracy in results and ease of use, notably improving allergy diagnostics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, JMBE, is committed to encouraging and providing the standard of biomedical engineering. The journal is devoted to publishing papers related to clinical engineering, biomedical signals, medical imaging, bio-informatics, tissue engineering, and so on. Other than the above articles, any contributions regarding hot issues and technological developments that help reach the purpose are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信