口腔内窥镜肌切开术后反流性食管炎的发病率和风险因素

Elise M. Wessels, Gwen M. C. Masclee, Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen, Paul Fockens, Albert J. Bredenoord
{"title":"口腔内窥镜肌切开术后反流性食管炎的发病率和风险因素","authors":"Elise M. Wessels, Gwen M. C. Masclee, Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen, Paul Fockens, Albert J. Bredenoord","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia, but often leads to posttreatment gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis after POEM and to identify associated predictive factors.MethodsPatients who underwent POEM between August 2011 and December 2022 were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictive factors for reflux esophagitis after POEM.Key ResultsIn total, 252 patients were included; of which, 46% were female and age ranged between 18 and 87 years. Reflux esophagitis within 1 year after POEM was observed in 131 patients (52%), which was severe in 29 patients (LA grade C/D, 12%). Length of full‐thickness myotomy (cm; OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), Eckardt scores before POEM (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.96), previous pneumatic dilation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.91), and previous laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23–0.86) were associated with reflux esophagitis after POEM. Alcohol use (none vs &gt; 7 units per week; OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.35–9.11) and overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>; OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.17–6.09) were positive predictive factors and previous LHM (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.95) was a negative predictive factor for severe reflux esophagitis after POEM (LA grade C/D).ConclusionAbout half of the patients develop reflux esophagitis after POEM and 12% is graded as severe. Recognizing predictive factors of reflux esophagitis after POEM treatment leads to better patient selection before POEM and provides an opportunity to take preventive measures or start preemptive treatment.","PeriodicalId":19104,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology & Motility","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis after peroral endoscopic myotomy\",\"authors\":\"Elise M. Wessels, Gwen M. C. Masclee, Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen, Paul Fockens, Albert J. Bredenoord\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia, but often leads to posttreatment gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis after POEM and to identify associated predictive factors.MethodsPatients who underwent POEM between August 2011 and December 2022 were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictive factors for reflux esophagitis after POEM.Key ResultsIn total, 252 patients were included; of which, 46% were female and age ranged between 18 and 87 years. Reflux esophagitis within 1 year after POEM was observed in 131 patients (52%), which was severe in 29 patients (LA grade C/D, 12%). Length of full‐thickness myotomy (cm; OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), Eckardt scores before POEM (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.96), previous pneumatic dilation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.91), and previous laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23–0.86) were associated with reflux esophagitis after POEM. Alcohol use (none vs &gt; 7 units per week; OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.35–9.11) and overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>; OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.17–6.09) were positive predictive factors and previous LHM (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.95) was a negative predictive factor for severe reflux esophagitis after POEM (LA grade C/D).ConclusionAbout half of the patients develop reflux esophagitis after POEM and 12% is graded as severe. Recognizing predictive factors of reflux esophagitis after POEM treatment leads to better patient selection before POEM and provides an opportunity to take preventive measures or start preemptive treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology & Motility\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology & Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology & Motility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景口腔内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是治疗贲门失弛缓症的一种有效而安全的方法,但常常导致治疗后胃食管反流病。本研究旨在探讨口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)后反流性食管炎的发生率和严重程度,并确定相关的预测因素。方法纳入2011年8月至2022年12月期间接受口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)的患者。主要结果共纳入 252 例患者,其中 46% 为女性,年龄介于 18 岁至 87 岁之间。131名患者(52%)在POEM术后1年内出现反流性食管炎,其中29名患者(LA C/D级,12%)病情严重。全厚肌切开术的长度(厘米;OR 1.11,95% CI 1.02-1.21)、POEM 前的 Eckardt 评分(OR 0.84,95% CI 0.74-0.96)、之前的气压扩张术(OR 0.51,95% CI 0.29-0.91)和之前的腹腔镜海勒肌切开术(LHM;OR 0.44,95% CI 0.23-0.86)与 POEM 后的反流性食管炎有关。饮酒(无 vs > 每周 7 单位;OR 3.51,95% CI 1.35-9.11)和超重(体重指数≥25 kg/m2;OR 2.67,95% CI 1.17-6.09)是阳性预测因素,而既往 LHM(OR 0.13,95% CI 0.结论约有一半的患者在 POEM 后发生反流性食管炎,其中 12% 的患者被评为重度反流性食管炎。识别 POEM 治疗后反流性食管炎的预测因素有助于在 POEM 治疗前更好地选择患者,并为采取预防措施或开始先期治疗提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incidence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis after peroral endoscopic myotomy

Incidence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis after peroral endoscopic myotomy
BackgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia, but often leads to posttreatment gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and severity of reflux esophagitis after POEM and to identify associated predictive factors.MethodsPatients who underwent POEM between August 2011 and December 2022 were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictive factors for reflux esophagitis after POEM.Key ResultsIn total, 252 patients were included; of which, 46% were female and age ranged between 18 and 87 years. Reflux esophagitis within 1 year after POEM was observed in 131 patients (52%), which was severe in 29 patients (LA grade C/D, 12%). Length of full‐thickness myotomy (cm; OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), Eckardt scores before POEM (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.96), previous pneumatic dilation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.91), and previous laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23–0.86) were associated with reflux esophagitis after POEM. Alcohol use (none vs > 7 units per week; OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.35–9.11) and overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2; OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.17–6.09) were positive predictive factors and previous LHM (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.95) was a negative predictive factor for severe reflux esophagitis after POEM (LA grade C/D).ConclusionAbout half of the patients develop reflux esophagitis after POEM and 12% is graded as severe. Recognizing predictive factors of reflux esophagitis after POEM treatment leads to better patient selection before POEM and provides an opportunity to take preventive measures or start preemptive treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信