{"title":"世贸组织争端解决和贸易制裁作为习惯国际法允许的第三方反措施","authors":"Satoru Taira","doi":"10.1163/18719732-12341498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The requirements for invoking <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> security exceptions as expounded in recent <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> dispute settlement cases are notably stricter than previously thought by <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members. Consequently, not all <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members who have imposed trade sanctions against Russia will be able to invoke these exceptions to justify their actions when accused by Russia of violations of their <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> obligations. This article considers whether <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members who may be unsuccessful in invoking security exceptions may nonetheless be able to justify their measures within the context of <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> dispute settlement under the customary international law on third-party countermeasures. It does so by exploring the scope of the relevant provisions within the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (<jats:sc>DSU</jats:sc>) as well as competence of <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> adjudicative bodies (i.e., <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> panels and the Appellate Body) to look beyond the four corners of the <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> covered agreements.","PeriodicalId":43487,"journal":{"name":"International Community Law Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WTO Dispute Settlement and Trade Sanctions as Permissible Third-Party Countermeasures under Customary International Law\",\"authors\":\"Satoru Taira\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18719732-12341498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The requirements for invoking <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> security exceptions as expounded in recent <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> dispute settlement cases are notably stricter than previously thought by <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members. Consequently, not all <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members who have imposed trade sanctions against Russia will be able to invoke these exceptions to justify their actions when accused by Russia of violations of their <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> obligations. This article considers whether <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> members who may be unsuccessful in invoking security exceptions may nonetheless be able to justify their measures within the context of <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> dispute settlement under the customary international law on third-party countermeasures. It does so by exploring the scope of the relevant provisions within the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (<jats:sc>DSU</jats:sc>) as well as competence of <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> adjudicative bodies (i.e., <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> panels and the Appellate Body) to look beyond the four corners of the <jats:sc>WTO</jats:sc> covered agreements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Community Law Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Community Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Community Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
WTO Dispute Settlement and Trade Sanctions as Permissible Third-Party Countermeasures under Customary International Law
The requirements for invoking WTO security exceptions as expounded in recent WTO dispute settlement cases are notably stricter than previously thought by WTO members. Consequently, not all WTO members who have imposed trade sanctions against Russia will be able to invoke these exceptions to justify their actions when accused by Russia of violations of their WTO obligations. This article considers whether WTO members who may be unsuccessful in invoking security exceptions may nonetheless be able to justify their measures within the context of WTO dispute settlement under the customary international law on third-party countermeasures. It does so by exploring the scope of the relevant provisions within the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) as well as competence of WTO adjudicative bodies (i.e., WTO panels and the Appellate Body) to look beyond the four corners of the WTO covered agreements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal aims to explore the implications of various traditions of international law, as well as more current perceived hegemonic trends for the idea of an international community. The Journal will also look at the ways and means in which the international community uses and adapts international law to deal with new and emerging challenges. Non-state actors , intergovernmental and non-governmental organisations, individuals, peoples, transnational corporations and civil society as a whole - have changed our outlook on contemporary international law. In addition to States and intergovernmental organizations, they now play an important role.