RENO 研究:西班牙北部转移性肾细胞癌患者的临床特征、治疗模式和生存结果

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"RENO 研究:西班牙北部转移性肾细胞癌患者的临床特征、治疗模式和生存结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current available evidence on the management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in real life is scarce in our environment. We present a summary of the existing real-world data and the results of an analysis describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and health outcomes of patients with mRCC in northern Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational study. Adult patients diagnosed with mRCC between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019 were included. Epidemiological, efficacy and toxicity data were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 829 patients were included (median age at diagnosis:63 years;73% men). Median follow-up was 180 months. The preponderant histology was clear cell (85%). In 50% the initial diagnosis was advanced disease. The distribution according to IMDC prognosis was good (24%), intermediate (50%) and poor (26%). The most frequent metastatic locations were lung (68.3%) and lymph node (41.0%). Most patients (95%) received a first line (1L) systemic treatment, 60% were treated with a second line (2L) of therapy and 37% received third line (3L). A VEGFR-TKIs was the most common treatment (1L: 90%, <em>n =</em> 507; 2L: 49%, <em>n =</em> 233; 3L: 54%, <em>n =</em> 156) followed by mTOR inhibitors (1L: 2%, <em>n =</em> 4; 2L: 27%, <em>n =</em> 126; 3L: 23%, <em>n =</em> 68) and immunotherapy (1L: 3.7%, <em>n =</em> 25; 2L: 27%, <em>n =</em> 126). Median OS was 24.5 months in the general population. According to IMDC prognostic groups, OS was 52.5, 25.7 and 9 months respectively. From the start of the 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment, median PFS was: 1L: 7.8 (6.8–9.0); 2L: 4.9 (4.3–5.5); 3L: 4.3 (3.8–4.8) months. No unexpected toxicity was reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Real-World Data on the management of mRCC in Northern Spain are comparable in epidemiology, efficacy, and safety to studies conducted in other areas of the world. The significant reduction in the number of patients receiving second and subsequent lines of therapy hampers the access to new therapies developed in this context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"51 3","pages":"Pages 77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775424000058/pdfft?md5=bbf749368d6faba97ca571a2cd93dc91&pid=1-s2.0-S0093775424000058-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RENO Study: Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival results in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Northern Spain\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current available evidence on the management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in real life is scarce in our environment. We present a summary of the existing real-world data and the results of an analysis describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and health outcomes of patients with mRCC in northern Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective observational study. Adult patients diagnosed with mRCC between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019 were included. Epidemiological, efficacy and toxicity data were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 829 patients were included (median age at diagnosis:63 years;73% men). Median follow-up was 180 months. The preponderant histology was clear cell (85%). In 50% the initial diagnosis was advanced disease. The distribution according to IMDC prognosis was good (24%), intermediate (50%) and poor (26%). The most frequent metastatic locations were lung (68.3%) and lymph node (41.0%). Most patients (95%) received a first line (1L) systemic treatment, 60% were treated with a second line (2L) of therapy and 37% received third line (3L). A VEGFR-TKIs was the most common treatment (1L: 90%, <em>n =</em> 507; 2L: 49%, <em>n =</em> 233; 3L: 54%, <em>n =</em> 156) followed by mTOR inhibitors (1L: 2%, <em>n =</em> 4; 2L: 27%, <em>n =</em> 126; 3L: 23%, <em>n =</em> 68) and immunotherapy (1L: 3.7%, <em>n =</em> 25; 2L: 27%, <em>n =</em> 126). Median OS was 24.5 months in the general population. According to IMDC prognostic groups, OS was 52.5, 25.7 and 9 months respectively. From the start of the 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment, median PFS was: 1L: 7.8 (6.8–9.0); 2L: 4.9 (4.3–5.5); 3L: 4.3 (3.8–4.8) months. No unexpected toxicity was reported.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Real-World Data on the management of mRCC in Northern Spain are comparable in epidemiology, efficacy, and safety to studies conducted in other areas of the world. The significant reduction in the number of patients receiving second and subsequent lines of therapy hampers the access to new therapies developed in this context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 77-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775424000058/pdfft?md5=bbf749368d6faba97ca571a2cd93dc91&pid=1-s2.0-S0093775424000058-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775424000058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093775424000058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现实生活中,有关转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)治疗的现有证据并不多。我们总结了现有的真实世界数据,并对西班牙北部 mRCC 患者的临床特征、治疗方法和健康结果进行了分析。回顾性观察研究。研究纳入了 2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间确诊为 mRCC 的成年患者。收集了流行病学、疗效和毒性数据。采用卡普兰-梅耶法确定中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。共纳入 829 名患者(诊断时的中位年龄:63 岁;73% 为男性)。中位随访时间为 180 个月。组织学特征以透明细胞为主(85%)。50%的患者最初诊断为晚期疾病。IMDC预后分布为良好(24%)、中等(50%)和较差(26%)。最常见的转移部位是肺部(68.3%)和淋巴结(41.0%)。大多数患者(95%)接受一线(1L)系统治疗,60%接受二线(2L)治疗,37%接受三线(3L)治疗。VEGFR-TKIs是最常见的治疗方法(1L:90%,507例;2L:49%,233例;3L:54%,156例),其次是mTOR抑制剂(1L:2%,4例;2L:27%,126例;3L:23%,68例)和免疫疗法(1L:3.7%,25例;2L:27%,126例)。一般人群的中位 OS 为 24.5 个月。根据IMDC预后分组,OS分别为52.5个月、25.7个月和9个月。从1L、2L和3L治疗开始,中位PFS分别为:1L:7.8(6.8-9.0)个月;2L:4.9(4.3-5.5)个月;3L:4.3(3.8-4.8)个月。无意外毒性报告。西班牙北部治疗 mRCC 的真实世界数据在流行病学、疗效和安全性方面与世界其他地区进行的研究相当。接受二线及后续治疗的患者人数大幅减少,阻碍了在此背景下开发的新疗法的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RENO Study: Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival results in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Northern Spain

Background

The current available evidence on the management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in real life is scarce in our environment. We present a summary of the existing real-world data and the results of an analysis describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and health outcomes of patients with mRCC in northern Spain.

Methods

Retrospective observational study. Adult patients diagnosed with mRCC between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019 were included. Epidemiological, efficacy and toxicity data were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 829 patients were included (median age at diagnosis:63 years;73% men). Median follow-up was 180 months. The preponderant histology was clear cell (85%). In 50% the initial diagnosis was advanced disease. The distribution according to IMDC prognosis was good (24%), intermediate (50%) and poor (26%). The most frequent metastatic locations were lung (68.3%) and lymph node (41.0%). Most patients (95%) received a first line (1L) systemic treatment, 60% were treated with a second line (2L) of therapy and 37% received third line (3L). A VEGFR-TKIs was the most common treatment (1L: 90%, n = 507; 2L: 49%, n = 233; 3L: 54%, n = 156) followed by mTOR inhibitors (1L: 2%, n = 4; 2L: 27%, n = 126; 3L: 23%, n = 68) and immunotherapy (1L: 3.7%, n = 25; 2L: 27%, n = 126). Median OS was 24.5 months in the general population. According to IMDC prognostic groups, OS was 52.5, 25.7 and 9 months respectively. From the start of the 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment, median PFS was: 1L: 7.8 (6.8–9.0); 2L: 4.9 (4.3–5.5); 3L: 4.3 (3.8–4.8) months. No unexpected toxicity was reported.

Conclusions

The Real-World Data on the management of mRCC in Northern Spain are comparable in epidemiology, efficacy, and safety to studies conducted in other areas of the world. The significant reduction in the number of patients receiving second and subsequent lines of therapy hampers the access to new therapies developed in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信