埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估电池(ECAS):验证研究

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yohannes Gebreegziabhere, Kassahun Habatmu, Matteo Cella, Atalay Alem
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估电池(ECAS):验证研究","authors":"Yohannes Gebreegziabhere, Kassahun Habatmu, Matteo Cella, Atalay Alem","doi":"10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognitive impairment is common in people with schizophrenia (PWS). To detect the presence and its consequences, cognitive measures with sound psychometric properties are needed. However, these are lacking especially in low-income countries. Hence, we developed the Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS). In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the ECAS in a cross-sectional study involving 350 PWS. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution. ECAS score correlated significantly but weakly with a disability measure (<i>r</i> = −0.13<i>, p</i> = 0.02) and symptom dimensions of PANSS (<i>r</i> between −0.12 and −0.29, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except for positive symptoms (<i>r</i> = −0.10, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Years of education (<i>β</i> = 0.12, 95% CI (0.09, 0.14), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), male sex (<i>β</i> = 0.22, 95% CI (0.05, 0.39)), age <i>β</i> = −0.02, 95% CI (−0.03, −0.01), and medication side effects (<i>β</i> = −0.03, 95% CI (−0.06, −0.01), <i>p</i> = 0.021) were significantly associated with the composite score of ECAS. The Item Response Theory analysis showed that the tool best functions among participants with moderate cognitive impairment (difficulty coefficient between −1.12 and 0.27). The Differential Item Functioning analyses showed that education had a positive contribution on Digit Symbol Substitution Test (MH OR = 2.64, 95% CI (1.34, 5.20)). The results showed that ECAS is valid in assessing cognition in PWS in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS): a validation study\",\"authors\":\"Yohannes Gebreegziabhere, Kassahun Habatmu, Matteo Cella, Atalay Alem\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cognitive impairment is common in people with schizophrenia (PWS). To detect the presence and its consequences, cognitive measures with sound psychometric properties are needed. However, these are lacking especially in low-income countries. Hence, we developed the Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS). In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the ECAS in a cross-sectional study involving 350 PWS. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution. ECAS score correlated significantly but weakly with a disability measure (<i>r</i> = −0.13<i>, p</i> = 0.02) and symptom dimensions of PANSS (<i>r</i> between −0.12 and −0.29, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), except for positive symptoms (<i>r</i> = −0.10, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Years of education (<i>β</i> = 0.12, 95% CI (0.09, 0.14), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), male sex (<i>β</i> = 0.22, 95% CI (0.05, 0.39)), age <i>β</i> = −0.02, 95% CI (−0.03, −0.01), and medication side effects (<i>β</i> = −0.03, 95% CI (−0.06, −0.01), <i>p</i> = 0.021) were significantly associated with the composite score of ECAS. The Item Response Theory analysis showed that the tool best functions among participants with moderate cognitive impairment (difficulty coefficient between −1.12 and 0.27). The Differential Item Functioning analyses showed that education had a positive contribution on Digit Symbol Substitution Test (MH OR = 2.64, 95% CI (1.34, 5.20)). The results showed that ECAS is valid in assessing cognition in PWS in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00462-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知障碍在精神分裂症(PWS)患者中很常见。要检测是否存在认知障碍及其后果,需要具有良好心理测量特性的认知测量方法。然而,特别是在低收入国家,这些方法还很缺乏。因此,我们开发了埃塞俄比亚精神分裂症认知评估系统(ECAS)。在本研究中,我们在一项涉及 350 名精神病患者的横断面研究中评估了 ECAS 的心理测量特性。确认性因子分析显示了单因子解。ECAS得分与残疾测量(r = -0.13,p = 0.02)和PANSS症状维度(r介于-0.12和-0.29之间,p <0.05)有明显但微弱的相关性,但阳性症状除外(r = -0.10,p >0.05)。受教育年限(β = 0.12,95% CI (0.09,0.14),p < 0.001)、男性(β = 0.22,95% CI (0.05,0.39))、年龄(β = -0.02,95% CI (-0.03,-0.01))和药物副作用(β = -0.03,95% CI (-0.06,-0.01),p = 0.021)与 ECAS 的综合得分显著相关。项目反应理论分析表明,该工具在中度认知障碍参与者中的功能最佳(难度系数介于-1.12和0.27之间)。差异项目功能分析显示,教育程度对数字符号替换测试有积极影响(MH OR = 2.64,95% CI (1.34, 5.20))。结果表明,在资源匮乏的环境中,ECAS对评估PWS患者的认知能力是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS): a validation study

Cognitive impairment is common in people with schizophrenia (PWS). To detect the presence and its consequences, cognitive measures with sound psychometric properties are needed. However, these are lacking especially in low-income countries. Hence, we developed the Ethiopian Cognitive Assessment battery in Schizophrenia (ECAS). In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the ECAS in a cross-sectional study involving 350 PWS. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution. ECAS score correlated significantly but weakly with a disability measure (r = −0.13, p = 0.02) and symptom dimensions of PANSS (r between −0.12 and −0.29, p < 0.05), except for positive symptoms (r = −0.10, p > 0.05). Years of education (β = 0.12, 95% CI (0.09, 0.14), p < 0.001), male sex (β = 0.22, 95% CI (0.05, 0.39)), age β = −0.02, 95% CI (−0.03, −0.01), and medication side effects (β = −0.03, 95% CI (−0.06, −0.01), p = 0.021) were significantly associated with the composite score of ECAS. The Item Response Theory analysis showed that the tool best functions among participants with moderate cognitive impairment (difficulty coefficient between −1.12 and 0.27). The Differential Item Functioning analyses showed that education had a positive contribution on Digit Symbol Substitution Test (MH OR = 2.64, 95% CI (1.34, 5.20)). The results showed that ECAS is valid in assessing cognition in PWS in low-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信