移动医疗队延迟调度呼吸窘迫呼叫的影响:法国急救通信中心的倾向得分匹配研究

Léo Charrin, Nicolas Romain-Scelle, Christian Di-Filippo, Eric Mercier, Frederic Balen, Karim Tazarourte, Axel Benhamed
{"title":"移动医疗队延迟调度呼吸窘迫呼叫的影响:法国急救通信中心的倾向得分匹配研究","authors":"Léo Charrin, Nicolas Romain-Scelle, Christian Di-Filippo, Eric Mercier, Frederic Balen, Karim Tazarourte, Axel Benhamed","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01201-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shortness of breath is a common complaint among individuals contacting emergency communication center (EMCCs). In some prehospital system, emergency medical services include an advanced life support (ALS)-capable team. Whether such team should be dispatched during the phone call or delayed until the BLS-capable paramedic team reports from the scene is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of delayed MMT dispatch until receiving the paramedic review compared to immediate dispatch at the time of the call on patient outcomes. A cross-sectional study conducted in Lyon, France, using data obtained from the departmental EMCC during the period from January to December 2019. We included consecutive calls related to adult patients experiencing acute respiratory distress. Patients from the two groups (immediate mobile medical team (MMT) dispatch or delayed MMT dispatch) were matched on a propensity score, and a conditional weighted logistic regression assessed the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome (mortality on days 0, 7 and 30). A total of 870 calls (median age 72 [57–84], male 466 53.6%) were sought for analysis [614 (70.6%) “immediate MMT dispatch” and 256 (29.4%) “delayed MMT” groups]. The median time before MMT dispatch was 25.1 min longer in the delayed MMT group (30.7 [26.4–36.1] vs. 5.6 [3.9–8.8] min, p < 0.001). Patients subjected to a delayed MMT intervention were older (median age 78 [66–87] vs. 69 [53–83], p < 0.001) and more frequently highly dependent (16.3% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in the delayed MMT group required bag valve mask ventilation (47.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.03), noninvasive ventilation (24.6% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.13), endotracheal intubation (7.0% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.07) and catecholamine infusion (3.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01). After propensity score matching, mortality at day 0 was higher in the delayed MMT group (9.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002). Immediate MMT dispatch at the call was associated with a lower risk of mortality on day 0 (0.60 [0.38;0.82], p < 0.001) day 7 (0.50 [0.27;0.72], p < 0.001) and day 30 (0.56 [0.35;0.78], p < 0.001) This study suggests that the deployment of an MMT at call in patients in acute respiratory distress may result in decreased short to medium-term mortality compared to a delayed MMT following initial first aid assessment.","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of delayed mobile medical team dispatch for respiratory distress calls: a propensity score matched study from a French emergency communication center\",\"authors\":\"Léo Charrin, Nicolas Romain-Scelle, Christian Di-Filippo, Eric Mercier, Frederic Balen, Karim Tazarourte, Axel Benhamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-024-01201-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shortness of breath is a common complaint among individuals contacting emergency communication center (EMCCs). In some prehospital system, emergency medical services include an advanced life support (ALS)-capable team. Whether such team should be dispatched during the phone call or delayed until the BLS-capable paramedic team reports from the scene is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of delayed MMT dispatch until receiving the paramedic review compared to immediate dispatch at the time of the call on patient outcomes. A cross-sectional study conducted in Lyon, France, using data obtained from the departmental EMCC during the period from January to December 2019. We included consecutive calls related to adult patients experiencing acute respiratory distress. Patients from the two groups (immediate mobile medical team (MMT) dispatch or delayed MMT dispatch) were matched on a propensity score, and a conditional weighted logistic regression assessed the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome (mortality on days 0, 7 and 30). A total of 870 calls (median age 72 [57–84], male 466 53.6%) were sought for analysis [614 (70.6%) “immediate MMT dispatch” and 256 (29.4%) “delayed MMT” groups]. The median time before MMT dispatch was 25.1 min longer in the delayed MMT group (30.7 [26.4–36.1] vs. 5.6 [3.9–8.8] min, p < 0.001). Patients subjected to a delayed MMT intervention were older (median age 78 [66–87] vs. 69 [53–83], p < 0.001) and more frequently highly dependent (16.3% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in the delayed MMT group required bag valve mask ventilation (47.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.03), noninvasive ventilation (24.6% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.13), endotracheal intubation (7.0% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.07) and catecholamine infusion (3.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01). After propensity score matching, mortality at day 0 was higher in the delayed MMT group (9.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002). Immediate MMT dispatch at the call was associated with a lower risk of mortality on day 0 (0.60 [0.38;0.82], p < 0.001) day 7 (0.50 [0.27;0.72], p < 0.001) and day 30 (0.56 [0.35;0.78], p < 0.001) This study suggests that the deployment of an MMT at call in patients in acute respiratory distress may result in decreased short to medium-term mortality compared to a delayed MMT following initial first aid assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01201-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01201-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼吸急促是与急救通信中心(EMCC)联系的人经常抱怨的问题。在某些院前系统中,急救医疗服务包括一个具备高级生命支持 (ALS) 能力的团队。究竟是在电话呼叫时派遣高级生命支持团队,还是等到具备高级生命支持能力的辅助医疗团队从现场报告后再派遣高级生命支持团队,目前尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估延迟 MMT 派遣直至接受辅助医疗人员审查与在电话呼叫时立即派遣对患者预后的影响。这是一项在法国里昂进行的横断面研究,使用的是 2019 年 1 月至 12 月期间从部门急救中心获得的数据。我们纳入了与急性呼吸窘迫成人患者相关的连续呼叫。两组患者(立即派遣移动医疗小组(MMT)或延迟派遣移动医疗小组)根据倾向得分进行匹配,并通过条件加权逻辑回归评估了每种结果(第 0、7 和 30 天的死亡率)的调整后几率比(ORs)。共有 870 个呼叫(中位年龄 72 [57-84],男性 466 53.6%)被纳入分析范围[614 个(70.6%)为 "立即派遣 MMT "组,256 个(29.4%)为 "延迟派遣 MMT "组]。在延迟 MMT 组中,MMT 调度前的中位时间延长了 25.1 分钟(30.7 [26.4-36.1] 分钟 vs. 5.6 [3.9-8.8] 分钟,P < 0.001)。接受延迟 MMT 干预的患者年龄更大(中位年龄为 78 [66-87] 岁 vs. 69 [53-83]岁,p < 0.001),依赖性更强(16.3% vs. 8.6%,p < 0.001)。延迟 MMT 组中需要袋阀面罩通气(47.3% 对 39.1%,p = 0.03)、无创通气(24.6% 对 20.0%,p = 0.13)、气管插管(7.0% 对 4.1%,p = 0.07)和儿茶酚胺输注(3.9% 对 1.3%,p = 0.01)的患者比例更高。经过倾向得分匹配后,延迟 MMT 组第 0 天的死亡率更高(9.8% 对 4.2%,p = 0.002)。这项研究表明,与在初步急救评估后延迟派遣急救医疗队相比,在急性呼吸窘迫患者呼救时派遣急救医疗队可降低患者的中短期死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of delayed mobile medical team dispatch for respiratory distress calls: a propensity score matched study from a French emergency communication center
Shortness of breath is a common complaint among individuals contacting emergency communication center (EMCCs). In some prehospital system, emergency medical services include an advanced life support (ALS)-capable team. Whether such team should be dispatched during the phone call or delayed until the BLS-capable paramedic team reports from the scene is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of delayed MMT dispatch until receiving the paramedic review compared to immediate dispatch at the time of the call on patient outcomes. A cross-sectional study conducted in Lyon, France, using data obtained from the departmental EMCC during the period from January to December 2019. We included consecutive calls related to adult patients experiencing acute respiratory distress. Patients from the two groups (immediate mobile medical team (MMT) dispatch or delayed MMT dispatch) were matched on a propensity score, and a conditional weighted logistic regression assessed the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome (mortality on days 0, 7 and 30). A total of 870 calls (median age 72 [57–84], male 466 53.6%) were sought for analysis [614 (70.6%) “immediate MMT dispatch” and 256 (29.4%) “delayed MMT” groups]. The median time before MMT dispatch was 25.1 min longer in the delayed MMT group (30.7 [26.4–36.1] vs. 5.6 [3.9–8.8] min, p < 0.001). Patients subjected to a delayed MMT intervention were older (median age 78 [66–87] vs. 69 [53–83], p < 0.001) and more frequently highly dependent (16.3% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in the delayed MMT group required bag valve mask ventilation (47.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.03), noninvasive ventilation (24.6% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.13), endotracheal intubation (7.0% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.07) and catecholamine infusion (3.9% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01). After propensity score matching, mortality at day 0 was higher in the delayed MMT group (9.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.002). Immediate MMT dispatch at the call was associated with a lower risk of mortality on day 0 (0.60 [0.38;0.82], p < 0.001) day 7 (0.50 [0.27;0.72], p < 0.001) and day 30 (0.56 [0.35;0.78], p < 0.001) This study suggests that the deployment of an MMT at call in patients in acute respiratory distress may result in decreased short to medium-term mortality compared to a delayed MMT following initial first aid assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信