将地理信息系统(GIS)和建筑信息模型(BIM)与城市设计、建造和维护(MCDM)结合起来进行基础设施规划:一个综合框架

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Paulo Alberto Sampaio Santos, Breno Cortez, Michele Tereza Marques Carvalho
{"title":"将地理信息系统(GIS)和建筑信息模型(BIM)与城市设计、建造和维护(MCDM)结合起来进行基础设施规划:一个综合框架","authors":"Paulo Alberto Sampaio Santos, Breno Cortez, Michele Tereza Marques Carvalho","doi":"10.1108/ecam-08-2023-0830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Present study aimed to integrate Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) in conjunction with multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) to enhance infrastructure investment planning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This analysis combines GIS databases with BIM simulations for a novel highway project. Around 150 potential alternatives were simulated, narrowed to 25 more effective routes and 3 options underwent in-depth analysis using PROMETHEE method for decision-making, based on environmental, cost and safety criteria, allowing for comprehensive cross-perspective comparisons.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>A comprehensive framework proposed was validated through a case study. Demonstrating its adaptability with customizable parameters. It aids decision-making, cost estimation, environmental impact analysis and outcome prediction. Considering these critical factors, this study holds the potential to advance new techniques for assessment and planning railways, power lines, gas and water.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study acknowledges limitations in GIS data quality, particularly in underdeveloped areas or regions with limited technology access. It also overlooks other pertinent variables, like social, economic, political and cultural issues. Thus, conclusions from these simulations may not entirely represent reality or diverse potential scenarios.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The proposed method automates decision-making, reducing subjectivity, aids in selecting effective alternatives and considers environmental criteria to mitigate negative impacts. Additionally, it minimizes costs and risks while demonstrating adaptability for assessing diverse infrastructures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>By integrating GIS and BIM data to support a MCDM workflow, this study proposes to fill the existing research gap in decision-making prioritization and mitigate subjective biases.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":11888,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating GIS and BIM with MCDM for infrastructure planning: a comprehensive framework\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Alberto Sampaio Santos, Breno Cortez, Michele Tereza Marques Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ecam-08-2023-0830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Present study aimed to integrate Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) in conjunction with multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) to enhance infrastructure investment planning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This analysis combines GIS databases with BIM simulations for a novel highway project. Around 150 potential alternatives were simulated, narrowed to 25 more effective routes and 3 options underwent in-depth analysis using PROMETHEE method for decision-making, based on environmental, cost and safety criteria, allowing for comprehensive cross-perspective comparisons.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>A comprehensive framework proposed was validated through a case study. Demonstrating its adaptability with customizable parameters. It aids decision-making, cost estimation, environmental impact analysis and outcome prediction. Considering these critical factors, this study holds the potential to advance new techniques for assessment and planning railways, power lines, gas and water.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The study acknowledges limitations in GIS data quality, particularly in underdeveloped areas or regions with limited technology access. It also overlooks other pertinent variables, like social, economic, political and cultural issues. Thus, conclusions from these simulations may not entirely represent reality or diverse potential scenarios.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The proposed method automates decision-making, reducing subjectivity, aids in selecting effective alternatives and considers environmental criteria to mitigate negative impacts. Additionally, it minimizes costs and risks while demonstrating adaptability for assessing diverse infrastructures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>By integrating GIS and BIM data to support a MCDM workflow, this study proposes to fill the existing research gap in decision-making prioritization and mitigate subjective biases.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":11888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2023-0830\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2023-0830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在将地理信息系统 (GIS) 和建筑信息模型 (BIM) 与多标准决策 (MCDM) 结合起来,以加强基础设施投资规划。根据环境、成本和安全标准,模拟了约 150 个潜在替代方案,将其缩小到 25 个更有效的路线,并使用 PROMETHEE 决策方法对 3 个方案进行了深入分析,以便进行全面的跨视角比较。结果通过案例研究验证了所提出的综合框架,证明其具有可定制参数的适应性。它有助于决策、成本估算、环境影响分析和结果预测。考虑到这些关键因素,本研究有望推动铁路、电力线、天然气和水的评估与规划新技术。研究还忽略了其他相关变量,如社会、经济、政治和文化问题。因此,这些模拟得出的结论可能并不完全代表现实或各种潜在方案。 实际意义所提出的方法可实现决策自动化,减少主观性,有助于选择有效的替代方案,并考虑环境标准以减轻负面影响。原创性/价值通过整合 GIS 和 BIM 数据以支持 MCDM 工作流程,本研究建议填补决策优先级排序方面的现有研究空白并减少主观偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating GIS and BIM with MCDM for infrastructure planning: a comprehensive framework

Purpose

Present study aimed to integrate Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) in conjunction with multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) to enhance infrastructure investment planning.

Design/methodology/approach

This analysis combines GIS databases with BIM simulations for a novel highway project. Around 150 potential alternatives were simulated, narrowed to 25 more effective routes and 3 options underwent in-depth analysis using PROMETHEE method for decision-making, based on environmental, cost and safety criteria, allowing for comprehensive cross-perspective comparisons.

Findings

A comprehensive framework proposed was validated through a case study. Demonstrating its adaptability with customizable parameters. It aids decision-making, cost estimation, environmental impact analysis and outcome prediction. Considering these critical factors, this study holds the potential to advance new techniques for assessment and planning railways, power lines, gas and water.

Research limitations/implications

The study acknowledges limitations in GIS data quality, particularly in underdeveloped areas or regions with limited technology access. It also overlooks other pertinent variables, like social, economic, political and cultural issues. Thus, conclusions from these simulations may not entirely represent reality or diverse potential scenarios.

Practical implications

The proposed method automates decision-making, reducing subjectivity, aids in selecting effective alternatives and considers environmental criteria to mitigate negative impacts. Additionally, it minimizes costs and risks while demonstrating adaptability for assessing diverse infrastructures.

Originality/value

By integrating GIS and BIM data to support a MCDM workflow, this study proposes to fill the existing research gap in decision-making prioritization and mitigate subjective biases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Business, Management and Accounting-General Business,Management and Accounting
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
19.50%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: ECAM publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, case studies, technical notes, book reviews, features, discussions and other contemporary articles that advance research and practice in engineering, construction and architectural management. In particular, ECAM seeks to advance integrated design and construction practices, project lifecycle management, and sustainable construction. The journal’s scope covers all aspects of architectural design, design management, construction/project management, engineering management of major infrastructure projects, and the operation and management of constructed facilities. ECAM also addresses the technological, process, economic/business, environmental/sustainability, political, and social/human developments that influence the construction project delivery process. ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信