简单多边形与单位正方形的包、盖和分割的硬度

Jack Stade, Mikkel Abrahamsen
{"title":"简单多边形与单位正方形的包、盖和分割的硬度","authors":"Jack Stade, Mikkel Abrahamsen","doi":"arxiv-2404.09835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that packing axis-aligned unit squares into a simple polygon $P$ is\nNP-hard, even when $P$ is an orthogonal and orthogonally convex polygon with\nhalf-integer coordinates. It has been known since the early 80s that packing\nunit squares into a polygon with holes is NP-hard~[Fowler, Paterson, Tanimoto,\nInf. Process. Lett., 1981], but the version without holes was conjectured to be\npolynomial-time solvable more than two decades ago~[Baur and Fekete,\nAlgorithmica, 2001]. Our reduction relies on a new way of reducing from \\textsc{Planar-3SAT}.\nInterestingly, our geometric realization of a planar formula is non-planar.\nVertices become rows and edges become columns, with crossings being allowed.\nThe planarity ensures that all endpoints of rows and columns are incident to\nthe outer face of the resulting drawing. We can then construct a polygon\nfollowing the outer face that realizes all the logic of the formula\ngeometrically, without the need of any holes. This new reduction technique proves to be general enough to also show\nhardness of two natural covering and partitioning problems, even when the input\npolygon is simple. We say that a polygon $Q$ is \\emph{small} if $Q$ is\ncontained in a unit square. We prove that it is NP-hard to find a minimum\nnumber of small polygons whose union is $P$ (covering) and to find a minimum\nnumber of pairwise interior-disjoint small polygons whose union is $P$\n(partitioning), when $P$ is an orthogonal simple polygon with half-integer\ncoordinates. This is the first partitioning problem known to be NP-hard for\npolygons without holes, with the usual objective of minimizing the number of\npieces.","PeriodicalId":501570,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hardness of Packing, Covering and Partitioning Simple Polygons with Unit Squares\",\"authors\":\"Jack Stade, Mikkel Abrahamsen\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2404.09835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that packing axis-aligned unit squares into a simple polygon $P$ is\\nNP-hard, even when $P$ is an orthogonal and orthogonally convex polygon with\\nhalf-integer coordinates. It has been known since the early 80s that packing\\nunit squares into a polygon with holes is NP-hard~[Fowler, Paterson, Tanimoto,\\nInf. Process. Lett., 1981], but the version without holes was conjectured to be\\npolynomial-time solvable more than two decades ago~[Baur and Fekete,\\nAlgorithmica, 2001]. Our reduction relies on a new way of reducing from \\\\textsc{Planar-3SAT}.\\nInterestingly, our geometric realization of a planar formula is non-planar.\\nVertices become rows and edges become columns, with crossings being allowed.\\nThe planarity ensures that all endpoints of rows and columns are incident to\\nthe outer face of the resulting drawing. We can then construct a polygon\\nfollowing the outer face that realizes all the logic of the formula\\ngeometrically, without the need of any holes. This new reduction technique proves to be general enough to also show\\nhardness of two natural covering and partitioning problems, even when the input\\npolygon is simple. We say that a polygon $Q$ is \\\\emph{small} if $Q$ is\\ncontained in a unit square. We prove that it is NP-hard to find a minimum\\nnumber of small polygons whose union is $P$ (covering) and to find a minimum\\nnumber of pairwise interior-disjoint small polygons whose union is $P$\\n(partitioning), when $P$ is an orthogonal simple polygon with half-integer\\ncoordinates. This is the first partitioning problem known to be NP-hard for\\npolygons without holes, with the usual objective of minimizing the number of\\npieces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.09835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.09835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们证明,将轴对齐的单位方格填入一个简单多边形 $P$ 是 NP 难的,即使 $P$ 是一个具有半整数坐标的正交正凸多边形。早在 80 年代初,人们就知道把单位正方形填入一个有洞的多边形是 NP 难的~[Fowler, Paterson, Tanimoto,Inf. Process. Lett.,1981],但没有洞的版本早在二十多年前就被猜想为可以在多项式时间内求解~[Baur and Fekete,Algorithmica, 2001]。我们的还原依赖于一种从 \textsc{Planar-3SAT} 还原的新方法。有趣的是,我们对平面公式的几何实现是非平面的。顶点变为行,边变为列,交叉是允许的。这样,我们就可以沿着外侧面构建一个多边形,从而几何地实现公式的所有逻辑,而无需任何孔洞。事实证明,即使输入的多边形很简单,这种新的还原技术也足以证明两个自然覆盖和分割问题的难易程度。如果 $Q$ 包含在一个单位正方形中,我们就说多边形 $Q$ 是 \emph{small}。我们证明,当 $P$ 是一个具有半整数坐标的正交简单多边形时,要找到一个最小数量的小多边形,其结合部为 $P$(覆盖),以及找到一个最小数量的成对内部相交的小多边形,其结合部为 $P$(分割),都是 NP 难的。这是已知的第一个对没有洞的多边形来说是 NP-困难的分割问题,其通常目标是最小化部件数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hardness of Packing, Covering and Partitioning Simple Polygons with Unit Squares
We show that packing axis-aligned unit squares into a simple polygon $P$ is NP-hard, even when $P$ is an orthogonal and orthogonally convex polygon with half-integer coordinates. It has been known since the early 80s that packing unit squares into a polygon with holes is NP-hard~[Fowler, Paterson, Tanimoto, Inf. Process. Lett., 1981], but the version without holes was conjectured to be polynomial-time solvable more than two decades ago~[Baur and Fekete, Algorithmica, 2001]. Our reduction relies on a new way of reducing from \textsc{Planar-3SAT}. Interestingly, our geometric realization of a planar formula is non-planar. Vertices become rows and edges become columns, with crossings being allowed. The planarity ensures that all endpoints of rows and columns are incident to the outer face of the resulting drawing. We can then construct a polygon following the outer face that realizes all the logic of the formula geometrically, without the need of any holes. This new reduction technique proves to be general enough to also show hardness of two natural covering and partitioning problems, even when the input polygon is simple. We say that a polygon $Q$ is \emph{small} if $Q$ is contained in a unit square. We prove that it is NP-hard to find a minimum number of small polygons whose union is $P$ (covering) and to find a minimum number of pairwise interior-disjoint small polygons whose union is $P$ (partitioning), when $P$ is an orthogonal simple polygon with half-integer coordinates. This is the first partitioning problem known to be NP-hard for polygons without holes, with the usual objective of minimizing the number of pieces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信