大陆延伸对沉积路径的破坏和定位:努勒维特斯维尔德鲁普盆地北部从上三叠世到下侏罗世的碎屑锆石出处变化

IF 2 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Derrick Midwinter, Thomas Hadlari, Keith Dewing, William A Matthews
{"title":"大陆延伸对沉积路径的破坏和定位:努勒维特斯维尔德鲁普盆地北部从上三叠世到下侏罗世的碎屑锆石出处变化","authors":"Derrick Midwinter, Thomas Hadlari, Keith Dewing, William A Matthews","doi":"10.1017/s0016756824000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Constraints on the tectonic setting of the upper Triassic to lower Jurassic in the Sverdrup Basin can be elucidated from detrital-zircon U-Pb ages. During the Triassic, there was a dual provenance system into sedimentary basins along the western and northern margins of Laurentia. One of the sediment sources was from an extra-basinal igneous source of Permian-Triassic zircon while the other source was recycled sediment eroded from older sedimentary basins. The Heiberg Formation/Group was deposited during a period of significant siliciclastic sedimentation into the basin from the upper Triassic to the lower Jurassic and comprises three members: Romulus, Fosheim and Remus. Previous work has interpreted that the Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic detrital zircon had stopped reaching the northern part of the Sverdrup Basin by deposition of the upper Heiberg Formation (lower Jurassic). New detrital-zircon age analyses from samples along the northern part of the basin spanning different horizons in the Heiberg Formation show that the typical extra-basinal signature, with abundant Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic ages, was no longer recorded during the initial deposition of the Fosheim Member during the latest Triassic. Previously published basin analysis from the Sverdrup Basin interprets syn-Jurassic extensional faults and so we relate the provenance change to the onset of extension. It is interpreted that the Sverdrup Basin transitioned from a basin that received sediment from a northern extra-basinal igneous source during deposition of the Romulus Member to an extensional basin by the deposition of the Fosheim Member in the latest Triassic, as the northern sediment source was interrupted by intervening extensional basins of the proto-Amerasia Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":12612,"journal":{"name":"Geological Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disruption and localization of sediment pathways by continental extension: Detrital-zircon provenance change from upper Triassic to lower Jurassic in the northern Sverdrup Basin, Nunavut\",\"authors\":\"Derrick Midwinter, Thomas Hadlari, Keith Dewing, William A Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0016756824000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Constraints on the tectonic setting of the upper Triassic to lower Jurassic in the Sverdrup Basin can be elucidated from detrital-zircon U-Pb ages. During the Triassic, there was a dual provenance system into sedimentary basins along the western and northern margins of Laurentia. One of the sediment sources was from an extra-basinal igneous source of Permian-Triassic zircon while the other source was recycled sediment eroded from older sedimentary basins. The Heiberg Formation/Group was deposited during a period of significant siliciclastic sedimentation into the basin from the upper Triassic to the lower Jurassic and comprises three members: Romulus, Fosheim and Remus. Previous work has interpreted that the Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic detrital zircon had stopped reaching the northern part of the Sverdrup Basin by deposition of the upper Heiberg Formation (lower Jurassic). New detrital-zircon age analyses from samples along the northern part of the basin spanning different horizons in the Heiberg Formation show that the typical extra-basinal signature, with abundant Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic ages, was no longer recorded during the initial deposition of the Fosheim Member during the latest Triassic. Previously published basin analysis from the Sverdrup Basin interprets syn-Jurassic extensional faults and so we relate the provenance change to the onset of extension. It is interpreted that the Sverdrup Basin transitioned from a basin that received sediment from a northern extra-basinal igneous source during deposition of the Romulus Member to an extensional basin by the deposition of the Fosheim Member in the latest Triassic, as the northern sediment source was interrupted by intervening extensional basins of the proto-Amerasia Basin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geological Magazine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geological Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756824000050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756824000050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯维德鲁普盆地上三叠世至下侏罗世的构造环境制约因素可通过碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄加以阐明。在三叠纪期间,劳伦西亚西部和北部边缘的沉积盆地存在双重来源系统。其中一个沉积物来源于二叠纪-三叠纪锆石的基底外火成岩来源,而另一个来源则是从较早的沉积盆地侵蚀出来的再循环沉积物。海伯格地层/组沉积于上三叠统至下侏罗统盆地大量硅质沉积时期,由三个成员组成:罗穆卢斯、福斯海姆和雷穆斯。之前的研究解释说,石炭纪-二叠纪-三叠纪的锆英石在上海贝格地层(下侏罗统)沉积时已经停止进入斯维德鲁普盆地北部。对盆地北部横跨海伯格地层不同地层的样本进行的新的碎屑锆石年龄分析表明,在三叠纪晚期福斯海姆组的最初沉积过程中,不再记录典型的基底外特征,即大量的石炭纪-二叠纪-三叠纪年龄。此前发表的斯维尔德鲁普盆地分析报告解释了同侏罗纪延伸断层,因此我们将产状变化与延伸的开始联系起来。据解释,斯维德鲁普盆地在罗穆卢斯成岩沉积期间,从一个接受来自北部基底外火成岩源的沉积物的盆地,过渡到最近三叠纪佛斯海姆成岩沉积时的延伸盆地,因为北部沉积物源被原亚美利加盆地的延伸盆地所打断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disruption and localization of sediment pathways by continental extension: Detrital-zircon provenance change from upper Triassic to lower Jurassic in the northern Sverdrup Basin, Nunavut

Constraints on the tectonic setting of the upper Triassic to lower Jurassic in the Sverdrup Basin can be elucidated from detrital-zircon U-Pb ages. During the Triassic, there was a dual provenance system into sedimentary basins along the western and northern margins of Laurentia. One of the sediment sources was from an extra-basinal igneous source of Permian-Triassic zircon while the other source was recycled sediment eroded from older sedimentary basins. The Heiberg Formation/Group was deposited during a period of significant siliciclastic sedimentation into the basin from the upper Triassic to the lower Jurassic and comprises three members: Romulus, Fosheim and Remus. Previous work has interpreted that the Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic detrital zircon had stopped reaching the northern part of the Sverdrup Basin by deposition of the upper Heiberg Formation (lower Jurassic). New detrital-zircon age analyses from samples along the northern part of the basin spanning different horizons in the Heiberg Formation show that the typical extra-basinal signature, with abundant Carboniferous-Permian-Triassic ages, was no longer recorded during the initial deposition of the Fosheim Member during the latest Triassic. Previously published basin analysis from the Sverdrup Basin interprets syn-Jurassic extensional faults and so we relate the provenance change to the onset of extension. It is interpreted that the Sverdrup Basin transitioned from a basin that received sediment from a northern extra-basinal igneous source during deposition of the Romulus Member to an extensional basin by the deposition of the Fosheim Member in the latest Triassic, as the northern sediment source was interrupted by intervening extensional basins of the proto-Amerasia Basin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geological Magazine
Geological Magazine 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geological Magazine, established in 1864, is one of the oldest and best-known periodicals in earth sciences. It publishes original scientific papers covering the complete spectrum of geological topics, with high quality illustrations. Its worldwide circulation and high production values, combined with Rapid Communications and Book Review sections keep the journal at the forefront of the field. This journal is included in the Cambridge Journals open access initiative, Cambridge Open Option.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信