Ziyue Liu, Meredith L. Carr, Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo, Luke A. Aucoin, Madison C. Yawn, Michelle T. Bensi
{"title":"沿海灾害概率分析中热带气旋大气参数联合分布模型的比较分析","authors":"Ziyue Liu, Meredith L. Carr, Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo, Luke A. Aucoin, Madison C. Yawn, Michelle T. Bensi","doi":"10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In probabilistic coastal hazard assessments based on the Joint Probability Method, historical storm data is used to build distribution models of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters (i.e., central pressure deficit, forward velocity, radius of maximum wind, and heading direction). Recent models have used a range of assumptions regarding the dependence structure between these random variables. This research investigates the performance of a series of joint distribution models based on assumptions of parameter independence, partial-dependence (i.e., dependence between only central pressure deficit and radius of maximum wind), and full dependence (i.e., dependence between each pair of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters). Full dependence models consider a range of copula models, such as the Gaussian copula and vine copulas that combine linear-circular copulas with Gaussian or Frank copulas. The consideration of linear-circular copulas allows for the characterization of correlation between linear variables (e.g., central pressure deficit) and circular variables (e.g., heading direction). The sensitivity of the results to different joint distribution models is assessed by comparing hazard curves at representative locations in New Orleans, LA (USA). The stability of hazard curves generated using a Gaussian copula considering variation in the selection of the zero-degree convention is also assessed. The tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind associated with various copula models are also compared using estimated conditional probability. It is found that the linear-circular Frank vine copula model improve the stability of hazard curves and maximize tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind. However, the meta-Gaussian copula model exhibits performance within this study region that was generally consistent with the tested vine copulas and have the advantage of being easier to implement.</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of joint distribution models for tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters in probabilistic coastal hazard analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ziyue Liu, Meredith L. Carr, Norberto C. Nadal-Caraballo, Luke A. Aucoin, Madison C. Yawn, Michelle T. Bensi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In probabilistic coastal hazard assessments based on the Joint Probability Method, historical storm data is used to build distribution models of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters (i.e., central pressure deficit, forward velocity, radius of maximum wind, and heading direction). Recent models have used a range of assumptions regarding the dependence structure between these random variables. This research investigates the performance of a series of joint distribution models based on assumptions of parameter independence, partial-dependence (i.e., dependence between only central pressure deficit and radius of maximum wind), and full dependence (i.e., dependence between each pair of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters). Full dependence models consider a range of copula models, such as the Gaussian copula and vine copulas that combine linear-circular copulas with Gaussian or Frank copulas. The consideration of linear-circular copulas allows for the characterization of correlation between linear variables (e.g., central pressure deficit) and circular variables (e.g., heading direction). The sensitivity of the results to different joint distribution models is assessed by comparing hazard curves at representative locations in New Orleans, LA (USA). The stability of hazard curves generated using a Gaussian copula considering variation in the selection of the zero-degree convention is also assessed. The tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind associated with various copula models are also compared using estimated conditional probability. It is found that the linear-circular Frank vine copula model improve the stability of hazard curves and maximize tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind. However, the meta-Gaussian copula model exhibits performance within this study region that was generally consistent with the tested vine copulas and have the advantage of being easier to implement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02652-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of joint distribution models for tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters in probabilistic coastal hazard analysis
In probabilistic coastal hazard assessments based on the Joint Probability Method, historical storm data is used to build distribution models of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters (i.e., central pressure deficit, forward velocity, radius of maximum wind, and heading direction). Recent models have used a range of assumptions regarding the dependence structure between these random variables. This research investigates the performance of a series of joint distribution models based on assumptions of parameter independence, partial-dependence (i.e., dependence between only central pressure deficit and radius of maximum wind), and full dependence (i.e., dependence between each pair of tropical cyclone atmospheric parameters). Full dependence models consider a range of copula models, such as the Gaussian copula and vine copulas that combine linear-circular copulas with Gaussian or Frank copulas. The consideration of linear-circular copulas allows for the characterization of correlation between linear variables (e.g., central pressure deficit) and circular variables (e.g., heading direction). The sensitivity of the results to different joint distribution models is assessed by comparing hazard curves at representative locations in New Orleans, LA (USA). The stability of hazard curves generated using a Gaussian copula considering variation in the selection of the zero-degree convention is also assessed. The tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind associated with various copula models are also compared using estimated conditional probability. It is found that the linear-circular Frank vine copula model improve the stability of hazard curves and maximize tail dependence between large central pressure deficit and large radius of maximum wind. However, the meta-Gaussian copula model exhibits performance within this study region that was generally consistent with the tested vine copulas and have the advantage of being easier to implement.
期刊介绍:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas:
- Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes.
- Enviroinformatics.
- Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making.
- Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics.
- Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.
- Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields.
- Chaotic and fractal systems.
- Random waves and seafloor morphology.
- Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes.
- Air pollution and quality assessment research.
- Modern geostatistics.
- Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption.
- Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection.
- Bioinformatics.
- Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology.
- Epidemiological investigations.
- Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations.
- Hazardous waste site characterization.