{"title":"封闭细胞迁移的非线性动力学--建模与推理","authors":"Pedrom Zadeh, Brian A. Camley","doi":"arxiv-2404.07390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The motility of eukaryotic cells is strongly influenced by their environment,\nwith confined cells often developing qualitatively different motility patterns\nfrom those migrating on simple two-dimensional substrates. Recent experiments,\ncoupled with data-driven methods to extract a cell's equation of motion, showed\nthat cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells persistently hop in a limit cycle when placed\non two-state adhesive micropatterns (two large squares connected by a narrow\nbridge), while they remain stationary on average in rectangular confinements.\nIn contrast, healthy MCF10A cells migrating on the two-state micropattern are\nbistable, i.e., they settle into either basin on average with only\nnoise-induced hops between the two states. We can capture all these behaviors\nwith a single computational phase field model of a crawling cell, under the\nassumption that contact with non-adhesive substrate inhibits the cell front.\nOur model predicts that larger and softer cells are more likely to persistently\nhop, while smaller and stiffer cells are more likely to be bistable. Other key\nfactors controlling cell migration are the frequency of protrusions and their\nmagnitude of noise. Our results show that relatively simple assumptions about\nhow cells sense their geometry can explain a wide variety of different cell\nbehaviors, and show the power of data-driven approaches to characterize both\nexperiment and simulation.","PeriodicalId":501321,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear dynamics of confined cell migration -- modeling and inference\",\"authors\":\"Pedrom Zadeh, Brian A. Camley\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2404.07390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The motility of eukaryotic cells is strongly influenced by their environment,\\nwith confined cells often developing qualitatively different motility patterns\\nfrom those migrating on simple two-dimensional substrates. Recent experiments,\\ncoupled with data-driven methods to extract a cell's equation of motion, showed\\nthat cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells persistently hop in a limit cycle when placed\\non two-state adhesive micropatterns (two large squares connected by a narrow\\nbridge), while they remain stationary on average in rectangular confinements.\\nIn contrast, healthy MCF10A cells migrating on the two-state micropattern are\\nbistable, i.e., they settle into either basin on average with only\\nnoise-induced hops between the two states. We can capture all these behaviors\\nwith a single computational phase field model of a crawling cell, under the\\nassumption that contact with non-adhesive substrate inhibits the cell front.\\nOur model predicts that larger and softer cells are more likely to persistently\\nhop, while smaller and stiffer cells are more likely to be bistable. Other key\\nfactors controlling cell migration are the frequency of protrusions and their\\nmagnitude of noise. Our results show that relatively simple assumptions about\\nhow cells sense their geometry can explain a wide variety of different cell\\nbehaviors, and show the power of data-driven approaches to characterize both\\nexperiment and simulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.07390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Cell Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2404.07390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nonlinear dynamics of confined cell migration -- modeling and inference
The motility of eukaryotic cells is strongly influenced by their environment,
with confined cells often developing qualitatively different motility patterns
from those migrating on simple two-dimensional substrates. Recent experiments,
coupled with data-driven methods to extract a cell's equation of motion, showed
that cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells persistently hop in a limit cycle when placed
on two-state adhesive micropatterns (two large squares connected by a narrow
bridge), while they remain stationary on average in rectangular confinements.
In contrast, healthy MCF10A cells migrating on the two-state micropattern are
bistable, i.e., they settle into either basin on average with only
noise-induced hops between the two states. We can capture all these behaviors
with a single computational phase field model of a crawling cell, under the
assumption that contact with non-adhesive substrate inhibits the cell front.
Our model predicts that larger and softer cells are more likely to persistently
hop, while smaller and stiffer cells are more likely to be bistable. Other key
factors controlling cell migration are the frequency of protrusions and their
magnitude of noise. Our results show that relatively simple assumptions about
how cells sense their geometry can explain a wide variety of different cell
behaviors, and show the power of data-driven approaches to characterize both
experiment and simulation.