基于深度学习的自动框架:前列腺癌患者 PSMA PET/CT 成像的摄取分割与分类

IF 2.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yang Li, Maliha R. Imami, Linmei Zhao, Alireza Amindarolzarbi, Esther Mena, Jeffrey Leal, Junyu Chen, Andrei Gafita, Andrew F. Voter, Xin Li, Yong Du, Chengzhang Zhu, Peter L. Choyke, Beiji Zou, Zhicheng Jiao, Steven P. Rowe, Martin G. Pomper, Harrison X. Bai
{"title":"基于深度学习的自动框架:前列腺癌患者 PSMA PET/CT 成像的摄取分割与分类","authors":"Yang Li, Maliha R. Imami, Linmei Zhao, Alireza Amindarolzarbi, Esther Mena, Jeffrey Leal, Junyu Chen, Andrei Gafita, Andrew F. Voter, Xin Li, Yong Du, Chengzhang Zhu, Peter L. Choyke, Beiji Zou, Zhicheng Jiao, Steven P. Rowe, Martin G. Pomper, Harrison X. Bai","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01104-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uptake segmentation and classification on PSMA PET/CT are important for automating whole-body tumor burden determinations. We developed and evaluated an automated deep learning (DL)-based framework that segments and classifies uptake on PSMA PET/CT. We identified 193 [<sup>18</sup>F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from two institutions, including 137 [<sup>18</sup>F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans for training and internally testing, and 56 scans from another institution for external testing. Two radiologists segmented and labelled foci as suspicious or non-suspicious for malignancy. A DL-based segmentation was developed with two independent CNNs. An anatomical prior guidance was applied to make the DL framework focus on PSMA-avid lesions. Segmentation performance was evaluated by Dice, IoU, precision, and recall. Classification model was constructed with multi-modal decision fusion framework evaluated by accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall. Automatic segmentation of suspicious lesions was improved under prior guidance, with mean Dice, IoU, precision, and recall of 0.700, 0.566, 0.809, and 0.660 on the internal test set and 0.680, 0.548, 0.749, and 0.740 on the external test set. Our multi-modal decision fusion framework outperformed single-modal and multi-modal CNNs with accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall of 0.764, 0.863, 0.844, 0.841, and 0.847 in distinguishing suspicious and non-suspicious foci on the internal test set and 0.796, 0.851, 0.865, 0.814, and 0.923 on the external test set. DL-based lesion segmentation on PSMA PET is facilitated through our anatomical prior guidance strategy. Our classification framework differentiates suspicious foci from those not suspicious for cancer with good accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Imaging","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated Deep Learning-Based Framework for Uptake Segmentation and Classification on PSMA PET/CT Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yang Li, Maliha R. Imami, Linmei Zhao, Alireza Amindarolzarbi, Esther Mena, Jeffrey Leal, Junyu Chen, Andrei Gafita, Andrew F. Voter, Xin Li, Yong Du, Chengzhang Zhu, Peter L. Choyke, Beiji Zou, Zhicheng Jiao, Steven P. Rowe, Martin G. Pomper, Harrison X. Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10278-024-01104-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Uptake segmentation and classification on PSMA PET/CT are important for automating whole-body tumor burden determinations. We developed and evaluated an automated deep learning (DL)-based framework that segments and classifies uptake on PSMA PET/CT. We identified 193 [<sup>18</sup>F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from two institutions, including 137 [<sup>18</sup>F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans for training and internally testing, and 56 scans from another institution for external testing. Two radiologists segmented and labelled foci as suspicious or non-suspicious for malignancy. A DL-based segmentation was developed with two independent CNNs. An anatomical prior guidance was applied to make the DL framework focus on PSMA-avid lesions. Segmentation performance was evaluated by Dice, IoU, precision, and recall. Classification model was constructed with multi-modal decision fusion framework evaluated by accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall. Automatic segmentation of suspicious lesions was improved under prior guidance, with mean Dice, IoU, precision, and recall of 0.700, 0.566, 0.809, and 0.660 on the internal test set and 0.680, 0.548, 0.749, and 0.740 on the external test set. Our multi-modal decision fusion framework outperformed single-modal and multi-modal CNNs with accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall of 0.764, 0.863, 0.844, 0.841, and 0.847 in distinguishing suspicious and non-suspicious foci on the internal test set and 0.796, 0.851, 0.865, 0.814, and 0.923 on the external test set. DL-based lesion segmentation on PSMA PET is facilitated through our anatomical prior guidance strategy. Our classification framework differentiates suspicious foci from those not suspicious for cancer with good accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Imaging\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01104-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01104-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PSMA PET/CT 的摄取分割和分类对于自动确定全身肿瘤负荷非常重要。我们开发并评估了一种基于深度学习(DL)的自动框架,该框架可对 PSMA PET/CT 的摄取量进行分割和分类。我们从两家机构确定了 193 例生化复发前列腺癌患者的 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT 扫描,其中 137 例 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT 扫描用于训练和内部测试,56 例扫描来自另一家机构用于外部测试。两名放射科医生对病灶进行了分割,并将其标记为可疑或非可疑恶性病灶。利用两个独立的 CNN 开发了基于 DL 的分割。应用解剖先验指导使 DL 框架聚焦于 PSMA 相关病灶。分割性能通过 Dice、IoU、精确度和召回率进行评估。利用多模态决策融合框架构建的分类模型通过准确率、AUC、F1 分数、精确度和召回率进行评估。在先验指导下,可疑病变的自动分割得到了改善,内部测试集的平均 Dice、IoU、精确度和召回率分别为 0.700、0.566、0.809 和 0.660,外部测试集的平均 Dice、IoU、精确度和召回率分别为 0.680、0.548、0.749 和 0.740。我们的多模态决策融合框架在内部测试集上区分可疑病灶和非可疑病灶的准确度、AUC、F1 分数、精确度和召回率分别为 0.764、0.863、0.844、0.841 和 0.847,在外部测试集上分别为 0.796、0.851、0.865、0.814 和 0.923,表现优于单模态和多模态 CNN。通过我们的解剖先验引导策略,PSMA PET 上基于 DL 的病灶分割变得更加容易。我们的分类框架能准确区分可疑病灶和非可疑癌症病灶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Automated Deep Learning-Based Framework for Uptake Segmentation and Classification on PSMA PET/CT Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer

An Automated Deep Learning-Based Framework for Uptake Segmentation and Classification on PSMA PET/CT Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer

Uptake segmentation and classification on PSMA PET/CT are important for automating whole-body tumor burden determinations. We developed and evaluated an automated deep learning (DL)-based framework that segments and classifies uptake on PSMA PET/CT. We identified 193 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer from two institutions, including 137 [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT scans for training and internally testing, and 56 scans from another institution for external testing. Two radiologists segmented and labelled foci as suspicious or non-suspicious for malignancy. A DL-based segmentation was developed with two independent CNNs. An anatomical prior guidance was applied to make the DL framework focus on PSMA-avid lesions. Segmentation performance was evaluated by Dice, IoU, precision, and recall. Classification model was constructed with multi-modal decision fusion framework evaluated by accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall. Automatic segmentation of suspicious lesions was improved under prior guidance, with mean Dice, IoU, precision, and recall of 0.700, 0.566, 0.809, and 0.660 on the internal test set and 0.680, 0.548, 0.749, and 0.740 on the external test set. Our multi-modal decision fusion framework outperformed single-modal and multi-modal CNNs with accuracy, AUC, F1 score, precision, and recall of 0.764, 0.863, 0.844, 0.841, and 0.847 in distinguishing suspicious and non-suspicious foci on the internal test set and 0.796, 0.851, 0.865, 0.814, and 0.923 on the external test set. DL-based lesion segmentation on PSMA PET is facilitated through our anatomical prior guidance strategy. Our classification framework differentiates suspicious foci from those not suspicious for cancer with good accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digital Imaging
Journal of Digital Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digital Imaging (JDI) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM). JDI’s goal is to enhance the exchange of knowledge encompassed by the general topic of Imaging Informatics in Medicine such as research and practice in clinical, engineering, and information technologies and techniques in all medical imaging environments. JDI topics are of interest to researchers, developers, educators, physicians, and imaging informatics professionals. Suggested Topics PACS and component systems; imaging informatics for the enterprise; image-enabled electronic medical records; RIS and HIS; digital image acquisition; image processing; image data compression; 3D, visualization, and multimedia; speech recognition; computer-aided diagnosis; facilities design; imaging vocabularies and ontologies; Transforming the Radiological Interpretation Process (TRIP™); DICOM and other standards; workflow and process modeling and simulation; quality assurance; archive integrity and security; teleradiology; digital mammography; and radiological informatics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信