COVID-19 是否改变了职前教师对教师职业的看法?有,但不一定是坏事

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Kendra Wells, Lia M. Daniels
{"title":"COVID-19 是否改变了职前教师对教师职业的看法?有,但不一定是坏事","authors":"Kendra Wells, Lia M. Daniels","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09912-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The teaching profession profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether these changes were for the better or worse depends on individual teachers’ perceptions. Pre-service teachers watched from the sidelines and their perceptions of the profession changed too, potentially implicating future career outcomes including career commitment, value of belongingness, teaching efficacy, and career anxiety. We used a person-centred analysis to cluster pre-service teachers (<i>n</i> = 146) based on their perceptions of changes to job demands and returns during the pandemic using the Factors Influencing Teaching Choice Scale. Three clusters emerged: a Neutral Group, a Valued Group, and a Busy Group. We used ANOVA to determine mean level differences between these groups on our career outcome variables. Significant mean differences emerged only for the value of belongingness and career anxiety variables. There were no significant differences between clusters on the commitment, right career decision, and efficacy variables, which is encouraging from a teacher retention perspective. Pre-service teachers generally remained committed to the teaching profession with the same career plans that they had pre-pandemic. We discuss the implications of this study for teacher education programs, policy, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has COVID-19 changed pre-service teachers perceptions of the profession? Yes, but not necessarily in bad ways\",\"authors\":\"Kendra Wells, Lia M. Daniels\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11218-024-09912-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The teaching profession profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether these changes were for the better or worse depends on individual teachers’ perceptions. Pre-service teachers watched from the sidelines and their perceptions of the profession changed too, potentially implicating future career outcomes including career commitment, value of belongingness, teaching efficacy, and career anxiety. We used a person-centred analysis to cluster pre-service teachers (<i>n</i> = 146) based on their perceptions of changes to job demands and returns during the pandemic using the Factors Influencing Teaching Choice Scale. Three clusters emerged: a Neutral Group, a Valued Group, and a Busy Group. We used ANOVA to determine mean level differences between these groups on our career outcome variables. Significant mean differences emerged only for the value of belongingness and career anxiety variables. There were no significant differences between clusters on the commitment, right career decision, and efficacy variables, which is encouraging from a teacher retention perspective. Pre-service teachers generally remained committed to the teaching profession with the same career plans that they had pre-pandemic. We discuss the implications of this study for teacher education programs, policy, and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology of Education\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09912-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09912-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,教师职业发生了深刻变化。这些变化是好是坏,取决于教师个人的看法。职前教师在一旁观看,他们对教师职业的看法也发生了变化,这可能会影响到他们未来的职业发展,包括职业承诺、归属感、教学效率和职业焦虑。我们采用以人为本的分析方法,根据职前教师(n = 146)对大流行病期间工作要求和回报变化的看法,使用 "影响教学选择的因素量表 "对他们进行分组。结果出现了三个分组:中立组、受重视组和繁忙组。我们使用方差分析来确定这些群体在职业结果变量上的平均水平差异。只有归属感价值和职业焦虑变量出现了显著的平均差异。各组之间在承诺、正确的职业决定和效能变量上没有明显差异,这从教师留任的角度来看是令人鼓舞的。职前教师普遍仍致力于教师职业,其职业规划与大流行前相同。我们讨论了本研究对教师教育计划、政策和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Has COVID-19 changed pre-service teachers perceptions of the profession? Yes, but not necessarily in bad ways

Has COVID-19 changed pre-service teachers perceptions of the profession? Yes, but not necessarily in bad ways

The teaching profession profoundly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether these changes were for the better or worse depends on individual teachers’ perceptions. Pre-service teachers watched from the sidelines and their perceptions of the profession changed too, potentially implicating future career outcomes including career commitment, value of belongingness, teaching efficacy, and career anxiety. We used a person-centred analysis to cluster pre-service teachers (n = 146) based on their perceptions of changes to job demands and returns during the pandemic using the Factors Influencing Teaching Choice Scale. Three clusters emerged: a Neutral Group, a Valued Group, and a Busy Group. We used ANOVA to determine mean level differences between these groups on our career outcome variables. Significant mean differences emerged only for the value of belongingness and career anxiety variables. There were no significant differences between clusters on the commitment, right career decision, and efficacy variables, which is encouraging from a teacher retention perspective. Pre-service teachers generally remained committed to the teaching profession with the same career plans that they had pre-pandemic. We discuss the implications of this study for teacher education programs, policy, and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology of Education
Social Psychology of Education PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The field of social psychology spans the boundary between the disciplines of psychology and sociology and has traditionally been associated with empirical research. Many studies of human behaviour in education are conducted by persons who identify with social psychology or whose work falls into the social psychological ambit. Several textbooks have been published and a variety of courses are being offered on the `social psychology of education'', but no journal has hitherto appeared to cover the field. Social Psychology of Education fills this gap, covering a wide variety of content concerns, theoretical interests and research methods, among which are: Content concerns: classroom instruction decision making in education educational innovation concerns for gender, race, ethnicity and social class knowledge creation, transmission and effects leadership in schools and school systems long-term effects of instructional processes micropolitics of schools student cultures and interactions teacher recruitment and careers teacher- student relations Theoretical interests: achievement motivation attitude theory attribution theory conflict management and the learning of pro-social behaviour cultural and social capital discourse analysis group dynamics role theory social exchange theory social transition social learning theory status attainment symbolic interaction the study of organisations Research methods: comparative research experiments formal observations historical studies literature reviews panel studies qualitative methods sample surveys For social psychologists with a special interest in educational matters, educational researchers with a social psychological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信