{"title":"新宗教运动与科学:现在怎么办,下一步怎么办,去哪里?","authors":"Stefano Bigliardi, Adam J. Chin","doi":"10.1111/rec3.12490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws on Stefano Bigliardi's recent Cambridge University Press Element <jats:italic>New Religious Movements and Science</jats:italic>, which provides an historical and comparative examination of how science is conceptualized within five New Religious Movements. We analyze Bigliardi's methodology and results, and offer multiple suggestions on how scholarship on NRMs and science can be extended and deepened.","PeriodicalId":44397,"journal":{"name":"Religion Compass","volume":"57 Suppl 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New religious movements and science: What now, what next, where to?\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Bigliardi, Adam J. Chin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rec3.12490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws on Stefano Bigliardi's recent Cambridge University Press Element <jats:italic>New Religious Movements and Science</jats:italic>, which provides an historical and comparative examination of how science is conceptualized within five New Religious Movements. We analyze Bigliardi's methodology and results, and offer multiple suggestions on how scholarship on NRMs and science can be extended and deepened.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion Compass\",\"volume\":\"57 Suppl 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文借鉴了斯特凡诺-比利亚尔迪(Stefano Bigliardi)最近在剑桥大学出版社出版的《新宗教运动与科学》(New Religious Movements and Science)一书,该书对五个新宗教运动如何将科学概念化进行了历史和比较研究。我们分析了比利亚尔迪的研究方法和结果,并就如何扩展和深化有关新宗教运动与科学的学术研究提出了多项建议。
New religious movements and science: What now, what next, where to?
This article draws on Stefano Bigliardi's recent Cambridge University Press Element New Religious Movements and Science, which provides an historical and comparative examination of how science is conceptualized within five New Religious Movements. We analyze Bigliardi's methodology and results, and offer multiple suggestions on how scholarship on NRMs and science can be extended and deepened.