连作和施用生物有机肥对减少化肥施用量条件下甜菜生长、产量和质量的影响

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Xiaoxia Guo, Lu Tian, Yinghao Li, Baiquan Song, Chunyan Huang, Zhi Li, Peng Zhang, Caiyuan Jian, Kang Han, Dejuan Kong, Zhenzhen Wang, Jia Liu, Jianchao Zhou, Wenbin Su
{"title":"连作和施用生物有机肥对减少化肥施用量条件下甜菜生长、产量和质量的影响","authors":"Xiaoxia Guo,&nbsp;Lu Tian,&nbsp;Yinghao Li,&nbsp;Baiquan Song,&nbsp;Chunyan Huang,&nbsp;Zhi Li,&nbsp;Peng Zhang,&nbsp;Caiyuan Jian,&nbsp;Kang Han,&nbsp;Dejuan Kong,&nbsp;Zhenzhen Wang,&nbsp;Jia Liu,&nbsp;Jianchao Zhou,&nbsp;Wenbin Su","doi":"10.1007/s12355-024-01386-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A major problem in the cultivation of sugar beet is continuous cropping cycle. A study was carried out in the 2019–2021 season at the Agriculture and Forestry Sciences of Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, to assess the impacts on the growth, root yield, and sugar content of sugar beet of various continuous cropping years with bio–organic fertilizers. A split plot system with three replications was set up to carry out the field testing. The main plots had five planting years, with the non-continuous of each growing season serving as the control (CK) and continuous cropping for one, two, three, and four years (designated as C1, C2, C3, and C4, respectively). The subplots had two bio-organic fertilizer levels: 6000 kg ha<sup>−2</sup> (Y) and 0 (N). The results demonstrated that continuous cropping stunted sugar beet growth and lowered yield and quality. The plant height, leaf area index, root volume, root yield, and sugar yield of sugar beet significantly decreased with the extension of continuous cropping years. Compared with CKN (CKY), plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight of C1N (C1Y), C2N (C2Y), C3N (C3Y), and C4N (C4Y) all showed a significantly decreased trend. Furthermore, the plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight reductions had amplitudes of 5.60–27.36%, 9.53–67.86%, 17.71–57.35%, and 17.54–45.03%, respectively. The distinctions between C1 and C2 were essentially not statistically significant, and the same was evident for C3 and C4. The root yield and sugar yield exhibit noteworthy relationships with each growth indices. Compared with CKN (CKY), C1N, C2N, C3N, and C4N significantly reduced their root yield and sugar yield by 19.20% and 25.08% (19.63% and 25.67%), 24.13% and 31.02% (24.74% and 32.32%), 44.03% and 55.15% (48.47% and 58.09%), and 47.89% and 61.85% (52.35% and 64.43%). Bio-organic fertilizers applied during the same planting year all had effects on the growth and yield of sugar beet; however, these effects were only significant under the planting year treatments of CK, C1, and C2. The amplitude of the increase in plant height, leaf area index, root volume, fresh weight, and root yield reached 2.76–7.95%, 10.21–24.67%, 10.66–14.88%, 7.03–14.83%, and 18.74–19.69%, respectively. Above all, sugar beet were hindered by continuous cropping, and bio-organic fertilizer can greatly increase sugar beet yield and growth for continuous cropping lasting one or two years; for continuous cropping lasting three or more years, additional measures should be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"26 3","pages":"786 - 798"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Continuous Cropping and Application of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet under Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Application\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxia Guo,&nbsp;Lu Tian,&nbsp;Yinghao Li,&nbsp;Baiquan Song,&nbsp;Chunyan Huang,&nbsp;Zhi Li,&nbsp;Peng Zhang,&nbsp;Caiyuan Jian,&nbsp;Kang Han,&nbsp;Dejuan Kong,&nbsp;Zhenzhen Wang,&nbsp;Jia Liu,&nbsp;Jianchao Zhou,&nbsp;Wenbin Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12355-024-01386-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A major problem in the cultivation of sugar beet is continuous cropping cycle. A study was carried out in the 2019–2021 season at the Agriculture and Forestry Sciences of Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, to assess the impacts on the growth, root yield, and sugar content of sugar beet of various continuous cropping years with bio–organic fertilizers. A split plot system with three replications was set up to carry out the field testing. The main plots had five planting years, with the non-continuous of each growing season serving as the control (CK) and continuous cropping for one, two, three, and four years (designated as C1, C2, C3, and C4, respectively). The subplots had two bio-organic fertilizer levels: 6000 kg ha<sup>−2</sup> (Y) and 0 (N). The results demonstrated that continuous cropping stunted sugar beet growth and lowered yield and quality. The plant height, leaf area index, root volume, root yield, and sugar yield of sugar beet significantly decreased with the extension of continuous cropping years. Compared with CKN (CKY), plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight of C1N (C1Y), C2N (C2Y), C3N (C3Y), and C4N (C4Y) all showed a significantly decreased trend. Furthermore, the plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight reductions had amplitudes of 5.60–27.36%, 9.53–67.86%, 17.71–57.35%, and 17.54–45.03%, respectively. The distinctions between C1 and C2 were essentially not statistically significant, and the same was evident for C3 and C4. The root yield and sugar yield exhibit noteworthy relationships with each growth indices. Compared with CKN (CKY), C1N, C2N, C3N, and C4N significantly reduced their root yield and sugar yield by 19.20% and 25.08% (19.63% and 25.67%), 24.13% and 31.02% (24.74% and 32.32%), 44.03% and 55.15% (48.47% and 58.09%), and 47.89% and 61.85% (52.35% and 64.43%). Bio-organic fertilizers applied during the same planting year all had effects on the growth and yield of sugar beet; however, these effects were only significant under the planting year treatments of CK, C1, and C2. The amplitude of the increase in plant height, leaf area index, root volume, fresh weight, and root yield reached 2.76–7.95%, 10.21–24.67%, 10.66–14.88%, 7.03–14.83%, and 18.74–19.69%, respectively. Above all, sugar beet were hindered by continuous cropping, and bio-organic fertilizer can greatly increase sugar beet yield and growth for continuous cropping lasting one or two years; for continuous cropping lasting three or more years, additional measures should be considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"786 - 798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-024-01386-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-024-01386-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甜菜种植的一个主要问题是连作周期。内蒙古乌兰察布市农林科学院于 2019-2021 年榨季开展了一项研究,以评估不同连作年份施用生物有机肥对甜菜生长、根产量和含糖量的影响。田间试验采用三次重复的分小区制。主小区有五个种植年限,每个生长季的非连作作为对照(CK),连作年限为一年、两年、三年和四年(分别称为 C1、C2、C3 和 C4)。子地块有两种生物有机肥水平:6000 千克/公顷-2(Y)和 0(N)。结果表明,连作阻碍了甜菜的生长,降低了产量和质量。随着连作年限的延长,甜菜的株高、叶面积指数、根茎体积、根茎产量和糖产量显著下降。与 CKN(CKY)相比,C1N(C1Y)、C2N(C2Y)、C3N(C3Y)和 C4N(C4Y)的株高、叶面积指数、根量和鲜重均呈显著下降趋势。此外,株高、叶面积指数、根量和鲜重的降低幅度分别为 5.60-27.36%、9.53-67.86%、17.71-57.35% 和 17.54-45.03%。C1 和 C2 之间的差异基本上没有统计学意义,C3 和 C4 也是如此。根产量和糖产量与各生长指数的关系值得注意。与 CKN(CKY)相比,C1N、C2N、C3N 和 C4N 的根产量和糖产量分别显著降低了 19.20% 和 25.08%(19.63% 和 25.67%)、24.13% 和 31.02%(24.74% 和 32.32%)、44.03% 和 55.15%(48.47% 和 58.09%)以及 47.89% 和 61.85%(52.35% 和 64.43%)。同一种植年份施用的生物有机肥对甜菜的生长和产量都有影响;但这些影响仅在 CK、C1 和 C2 的种植年份处理下显著。株高、叶面积指数、根量、鲜重和根产量的增幅分别为 2.76-7.95%、10.21-24.67%、10.66-14.88%、7.03-14.83% 和 18.74-19.69%。总之,甜菜连作受阻,生物有机肥对一至二年的连作可大大提高甜菜的产量和长势;对三年或三年以上的连作,应考虑采取其他措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Continuous Cropping and Application of Bio-organic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet under Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Application

A major problem in the cultivation of sugar beet is continuous cropping cycle. A study was carried out in the 2019–2021 season at the Agriculture and Forestry Sciences of Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, to assess the impacts on the growth, root yield, and sugar content of sugar beet of various continuous cropping years with bio–organic fertilizers. A split plot system with three replications was set up to carry out the field testing. The main plots had five planting years, with the non-continuous of each growing season serving as the control (CK) and continuous cropping for one, two, three, and four years (designated as C1, C2, C3, and C4, respectively). The subplots had two bio-organic fertilizer levels: 6000 kg ha−2 (Y) and 0 (N). The results demonstrated that continuous cropping stunted sugar beet growth and lowered yield and quality. The plant height, leaf area index, root volume, root yield, and sugar yield of sugar beet significantly decreased with the extension of continuous cropping years. Compared with CKN (CKY), plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight of C1N (C1Y), C2N (C2Y), C3N (C3Y), and C4N (C4Y) all showed a significantly decreased trend. Furthermore, the plant height, leaf area index, root volume, and fresh weight reductions had amplitudes of 5.60–27.36%, 9.53–67.86%, 17.71–57.35%, and 17.54–45.03%, respectively. The distinctions between C1 and C2 were essentially not statistically significant, and the same was evident for C3 and C4. The root yield and sugar yield exhibit noteworthy relationships with each growth indices. Compared with CKN (CKY), C1N, C2N, C3N, and C4N significantly reduced their root yield and sugar yield by 19.20% and 25.08% (19.63% and 25.67%), 24.13% and 31.02% (24.74% and 32.32%), 44.03% and 55.15% (48.47% and 58.09%), and 47.89% and 61.85% (52.35% and 64.43%). Bio-organic fertilizers applied during the same planting year all had effects on the growth and yield of sugar beet; however, these effects were only significant under the planting year treatments of CK, C1, and C2. The amplitude of the increase in plant height, leaf area index, root volume, fresh weight, and root yield reached 2.76–7.95%, 10.21–24.67%, 10.66–14.88%, 7.03–14.83%, and 18.74–19.69%, respectively. Above all, sugar beet were hindered by continuous cropping, and bio-organic fertilizer can greatly increase sugar beet yield and growth for continuous cropping lasting one or two years; for continuous cropping lasting three or more years, additional measures should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信