两种地球地幔对流数值模型的比较

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
V. V. Chervov, G. G. Chernykh, I. B. Palymskiy
{"title":"两种地球地幔对流数值模型的比较","authors":"V. V. Chervov,&nbsp;G. G. Chernykh,&nbsp;I. B. Palymskiy","doi":"10.1134/S1810232824010041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The three-dimensional convection in the Earth’s mantle is studied with a well-known mathematical model, which includes the Navier–Stokes equations in the Oberbeck–Boussinesq and geodynamic approximations. Two numerical models of convection are considered. The first is based on the implicit finite-difference schemes of splitting over spatial variables with correction of pressure. The second numerical model is based on the spectral difference method. The numerical models constructed were compared on model problems of convection in a rectangular parallelepiped in a liquid with constant viscosity, corresponding to the convection in the entire mantle of the Earth [1]. The calculation results are in good agreement with the test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics","volume":"33 1","pages":"29 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Numerical Models of Convection in the Earth’s Mantle\",\"authors\":\"V. V. Chervov,&nbsp;G. G. Chernykh,&nbsp;I. B. Palymskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1810232824010041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The three-dimensional convection in the Earth’s mantle is studied with a well-known mathematical model, which includes the Navier–Stokes equations in the Oberbeck–Boussinesq and geodynamic approximations. Two numerical models of convection are considered. The first is based on the implicit finite-difference schemes of splitting over spatial variables with correction of pressure. The second numerical model is based on the spectral difference method. The numerical models constructed were compared on model problems of convection in a rectangular parallelepiped in a liquid with constant viscosity, corresponding to the convection in the entire mantle of the Earth [1]. The calculation results are in good agreement with the test results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1810232824010041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Thermophysics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1810232824010041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 通过一个著名的数学模型研究了地幔中的三维对流,该模型包括奥伯贝克-布西内斯克近似和地球动力学近似的纳维-斯托克斯方程。研究考虑了两种对流数值模型。第一种是基于空间变量的隐式有限差分方案,并对压力进行修正。第二个数值模型基于谱差法。所构建的数值模型在具有恒定粘度的液体中的矩形平行管对流模型问题上进行了比较,这相当于整个地幔中的对流[1]。计算结果与试验结果十分吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Two Numerical Models of Convection in the Earth’s Mantle

Comparison of Two Numerical Models of Convection in the Earth’s Mantle

Comparison of Two Numerical Models of Convection in the Earth’s Mantle

The three-dimensional convection in the Earth’s mantle is studied with a well-known mathematical model, which includes the Navier–Stokes equations in the Oberbeck–Boussinesq and geodynamic approximations. Two numerical models of convection are considered. The first is based on the implicit finite-difference schemes of splitting over spatial variables with correction of pressure. The second numerical model is based on the spectral difference method. The numerical models constructed were compared on model problems of convection in a rectangular parallelepiped in a liquid with constant viscosity, corresponding to the convection in the entire mantle of the Earth [1]. The calculation results are in good agreement with the test results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics THERMODYNAMICS-ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Thermophysics is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original articles. The journal welcomes original articles on thermophysics from all countries in the English language. The journal focuses on experimental work, theory, analysis, and computational studies for better understanding of engineering and environmental aspects of thermophysics. The editorial board encourages the authors to submit papers with emphasis on new scientific aspects in experimental and visualization techniques, mathematical models of thermophysical process, energy, and environmental applications. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics covers all subject matter related to thermophysics, including heat and mass transfer, multiphase flow, conduction, radiation, combustion, thermo-gas dynamics, rarefied gas flow, environmental protection in power engineering, and many others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信