将基因组检测的新时代延伸到孕期管理中:澳大利亚产前服务的建议模式

Alice Rogers, Lucas De Jong, Wendy Waters, Lesley H. Rawlings, Keryn Simons, Song Gao, Julien Soubrier, Rosalie Kenyon, Ming Lin, Rob King, David M. Lawrence, Peter Muller, Shannon Leblanc, Lesley McGregor, Suzanne C. E. H. Sallevelt, Jan Liebelt, Tristan S. E. Hardy, Janice M. Fletcher, Hamish S. Scott, Abhi Kulkarni, Christopher P. Barnett, Karin S. Kassahn
{"title":"将基因组检测的新时代延伸到孕期管理中:澳大利亚产前服务的建议模式","authors":"Alice Rogers, Lucas De Jong, Wendy Waters, Lesley H. Rawlings, Keryn Simons, Song Gao, Julien Soubrier, Rosalie Kenyon, Ming Lin, Rob King, David M. Lawrence, Peter Muller, Shannon Leblanc, Lesley McGregor, Suzanne C. E. H. Sallevelt, Jan Liebelt, Tristan S. E. Hardy, Janice M. Fletcher, Hamish S. Scott, Abhi Kulkarni, Christopher P. Barnett, Karin S. Kassahn","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundTrio exome sequencing can be used to investigate congenital abnormalities identified on pregnancy ultrasound, but its use in an Australian context has not been assessed.AimsAssess clinical outcomes and changes in management after expedited genomic testing in the prenatal period to guide the development of a model for widespread implementation.Materials and methodsForty‐three prospective referrals for whole exome sequencing, including 40 trios (parents and pregnancy), two singletons and one duo were assessed in a tertiary hospital setting with access to a state‐wide pathology laboratory. Diagnostic yield, turn‐around time (TAT), gestational age at reporting, pregnancy outcome, change in management and future pregnancy status were assessed for each family.ResultsA clinically significant genomic diagnosis was made in 15/43 pregnancies (35%), with an average TAT of 12 days. Gestational age at time of report ranged from 16 + 5 to 31 + 6 weeks (median 21 + 3 weeks). Molecular diagnoses included neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, RASopathies and a range of other rare Mendelian disorders. The majority of families actively used the results in pregnancy decision making as well as in management of future pregnancies.ConclusionsRapid second trimester prenatal genomic testing can be successfully delivered to investigate structural abnormalities in pregnancy, providing crucial guidance for current and future pregnancy management. The time‐sensitive nature of this testing requires close laboratory and clinical collaboration to ensure appropriate referral and result communication. We found the establishment of a prenatal coordinator role and dedicated reporting team to be important facilitators. We propose this as a model for genomic testing in other prenatal services.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending the new era of genomic testing into pregnancy management: A proposed model for Australian prenatal services\",\"authors\":\"Alice Rogers, Lucas De Jong, Wendy Waters, Lesley H. Rawlings, Keryn Simons, Song Gao, Julien Soubrier, Rosalie Kenyon, Ming Lin, Rob King, David M. Lawrence, Peter Muller, Shannon Leblanc, Lesley McGregor, Suzanne C. E. H. Sallevelt, Jan Liebelt, Tristan S. E. Hardy, Janice M. Fletcher, Hamish S. Scott, Abhi Kulkarni, Christopher P. Barnett, Karin S. Kassahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundTrio exome sequencing can be used to investigate congenital abnormalities identified on pregnancy ultrasound, but its use in an Australian context has not been assessed.AimsAssess clinical outcomes and changes in management after expedited genomic testing in the prenatal period to guide the development of a model for widespread implementation.Materials and methodsForty‐three prospective referrals for whole exome sequencing, including 40 trios (parents and pregnancy), two singletons and one duo were assessed in a tertiary hospital setting with access to a state‐wide pathology laboratory. Diagnostic yield, turn‐around time (TAT), gestational age at reporting, pregnancy outcome, change in management and future pregnancy status were assessed for each family.ResultsA clinically significant genomic diagnosis was made in 15/43 pregnancies (35%), with an average TAT of 12 days. Gestational age at time of report ranged from 16 + 5 to 31 + 6 weeks (median 21 + 3 weeks). Molecular diagnoses included neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, RASopathies and a range of other rare Mendelian disorders. The majority of families actively used the results in pregnancy decision making as well as in management of future pregnancies.ConclusionsRapid second trimester prenatal genomic testing can be successfully delivered to investigate structural abnormalities in pregnancy, providing crucial guidance for current and future pregnancy management. The time‐sensitive nature of this testing requires close laboratory and clinical collaboration to ensure appropriate referral and result communication. We found the establishment of a prenatal coordinator role and dedicated reporting team to be important facilitators. We propose this as a model for genomic testing in other prenatal services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估产前快速基因组检测后的临床结果和管理变化,以指导制定广泛实施的模式。材料和方法在一家可使用全州病理实验室的三级医院中,对 43 例转诊的全外显子组测序患者进行了评估,其中包括 40 例三胞胎(父母和孕妇)、2 例单胎和 1 例双胎。对每个家庭的诊断率、周转时间(TAT)、报告时的胎龄、妊娠结局、管理变化和未来妊娠状况进行了评估。结果 15/43 例孕妇(35%)获得了有临床意义的基因组诊断,平均周转时间为 12 天。报告时的胎龄从 16+5 周到 31+6 周不等(中位数为 21+3 周)。分子诊断包括神经肌肉和骨骼疾病、RAS 病和一系列其他罕见孟德尔疾病。结论第二孕期产前基因组快速检测可成功用于调查妊娠结构异常,为当前和未来的妊娠管理提供重要指导。这种检测的时效性要求实验室和临床密切合作,以确保适当的转诊和结果沟通。我们发现,设立产前协调员和专门的报告小组是重要的促进因素。我们建议将此作为其他产前服务机构基因组检测的一种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extending the new era of genomic testing into pregnancy management: A proposed model for Australian prenatal services
BackgroundTrio exome sequencing can be used to investigate congenital abnormalities identified on pregnancy ultrasound, but its use in an Australian context has not been assessed.AimsAssess clinical outcomes and changes in management after expedited genomic testing in the prenatal period to guide the development of a model for widespread implementation.Materials and methodsForty‐three prospective referrals for whole exome sequencing, including 40 trios (parents and pregnancy), two singletons and one duo were assessed in a tertiary hospital setting with access to a state‐wide pathology laboratory. Diagnostic yield, turn‐around time (TAT), gestational age at reporting, pregnancy outcome, change in management and future pregnancy status were assessed for each family.ResultsA clinically significant genomic diagnosis was made in 15/43 pregnancies (35%), with an average TAT of 12 days. Gestational age at time of report ranged from 16 + 5 to 31 + 6 weeks (median 21 + 3 weeks). Molecular diagnoses included neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, RASopathies and a range of other rare Mendelian disorders. The majority of families actively used the results in pregnancy decision making as well as in management of future pregnancies.ConclusionsRapid second trimester prenatal genomic testing can be successfully delivered to investigate structural abnormalities in pregnancy, providing crucial guidance for current and future pregnancy management. The time‐sensitive nature of this testing requires close laboratory and clinical collaboration to ensure appropriate referral and result communication. We found the establishment of a prenatal coordinator role and dedicated reporting team to be important facilitators. We propose this as a model for genomic testing in other prenatal services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信