{"title":"针对盆腔疼痛妇女的小组多学科疼痛自我管理干预措施所带来的改善在 12 个月后得以保持","authors":"Karen Joseph, Jessica Mills","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A small-group multidisciplinary pain self-management program for women living with pelvic pain, with or without endometriosis, was developed to address identified unmet treatment needs. Following completion, over 80% of participants demonstrated clinically significant improvement across a number of domains. There was no clinically significant deterioration on any measure and benefits continued at three months follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines patient-reported outcomes at 12 months following program completion to ascertain maintenance of these improvements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Self-report measures assessed quality of life across the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials domains prior to, at completion and 12 months following participation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 12 months follow-up, improvement was seen in mean group scores for all baseline measures for 57% of participants who returned valid 12-month follow-up data, with clinically significant improvement seen for within-subject scores for 50% of these participants for pain severity and also for pain-related activity interference. Improvements were also reported in key predictors of long-term outcomes, pain self-efficacy and catastrophic worry, with 92% reporting improvement in each of these two constructs. There were 83% of respondents who reported feeling both improvement in overall sense of wellbeing and improvement in their physical ability compared to before the program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results suggest that a six-week multidisciplinary small-group intervention increases participants' abilities to self-manage pain and improves quality of life with lasting clinically significant improvements.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"64 5","pages":"482-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvements from a small-group multidisciplinary pain self-management intervention for women living with pelvic pain maintained at 12 months\",\"authors\":\"Karen Joseph, Jessica Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>A small-group multidisciplinary pain self-management program for women living with pelvic pain, with or without endometriosis, was developed to address identified unmet treatment needs. Following completion, over 80% of participants demonstrated clinically significant improvement across a number of domains. There was no clinically significant deterioration on any measure and benefits continued at three months follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examines patient-reported outcomes at 12 months following program completion to ascertain maintenance of these improvements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-report measures assessed quality of life across the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials domains prior to, at completion and 12 months following participation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>At 12 months follow-up, improvement was seen in mean group scores for all baseline measures for 57% of participants who returned valid 12-month follow-up data, with clinically significant improvement seen for within-subject scores for 50% of these participants for pain severity and also for pain-related activity interference. Improvements were also reported in key predictors of long-term outcomes, pain self-efficacy and catastrophic worry, with 92% reporting improvement in each of these two constructs. There were 83% of respondents who reported feeling both improvement in overall sense of wellbeing and improvement in their physical ability compared to before the program.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results suggest that a six-week multidisciplinary small-group intervention increases participants' abilities to self-manage pain and improves quality of life with lasting clinically significant improvements.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"64 5\",\"pages\":\"482-488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.13817\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.13817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improvements from a small-group multidisciplinary pain self-management intervention for women living with pelvic pain maintained at 12 months
Background
A small-group multidisciplinary pain self-management program for women living with pelvic pain, with or without endometriosis, was developed to address identified unmet treatment needs. Following completion, over 80% of participants demonstrated clinically significant improvement across a number of domains. There was no clinically significant deterioration on any measure and benefits continued at three months follow-up.
Aims
This study examines patient-reported outcomes at 12 months following program completion to ascertain maintenance of these improvements.
Materials and methods
Self-report measures assessed quality of life across the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials domains prior to, at completion and 12 months following participation.
Results
At 12 months follow-up, improvement was seen in mean group scores for all baseline measures for 57% of participants who returned valid 12-month follow-up data, with clinically significant improvement seen for within-subject scores for 50% of these participants for pain severity and also for pain-related activity interference. Improvements were also reported in key predictors of long-term outcomes, pain self-efficacy and catastrophic worry, with 92% reporting improvement in each of these two constructs. There were 83% of respondents who reported feeling both improvement in overall sense of wellbeing and improvement in their physical ability compared to before the program.
Conclusions
Results suggest that a six-week multidisciplinary small-group intervention increases participants' abilities to self-manage pain and improves quality of life with lasting clinically significant improvements.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.