不同周围环境下建筑物空气渗透率预测模型的比较

IF 5.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Shu Zheng, Xiujiao Song, Lin Duanmu, Yu Xue, Xudong Yang
{"title":"不同周围环境下建筑物空气渗透率预测模型的比较","authors":"Shu Zheng, Xiujiao Song, Lin Duanmu, Yu Xue, Xudong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s12273-024-1118-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The air infiltration rate of buildings strongly influences indoor environment and energy consumption. In this study, several traditional methods for determining the air infiltration rate were compared, and their accuracy in different scenarios was examined. Additionally, a method combining computational flow dynamics (CFD) with the Swami and Chandra (S-C) model was developed to predict the influence of the surrounding environment on the air infiltration rate. Two buildings in Dalian, China, were selected: one with a simple surrounding environment and the other with a complex surrounding environment; their air infiltration rates were measured. The test results were used to validate the accuracy of the air infiltration rate solution models in different urban environments. For the building with a simple environment, the difference between the simulation and experimental results was 0.86%–22.52%. For the building with a complex environment, this difference ranged from 17.42% to 159.28%. We found that most traditional models provide accurate results for buildings with simple surrounding and that the simulation results widely vary for buildings with complex surrounding. The results of the method of combining CFD with the S-C model were more accurate, and the relative error between the simulation and test results was 10.61%. The results indicate that the environment around the building should be fully considered when calculating the air infiltration rate. The results of this study can guide the application of methods of determining air infiltration rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":49226,"journal":{"name":"Building Simulation","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of models to predict air infiltration rate of buildings with different surrounding environments\",\"authors\":\"Shu Zheng, Xiujiao Song, Lin Duanmu, Yu Xue, Xudong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12273-024-1118-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The air infiltration rate of buildings strongly influences indoor environment and energy consumption. In this study, several traditional methods for determining the air infiltration rate were compared, and their accuracy in different scenarios was examined. Additionally, a method combining computational flow dynamics (CFD) with the Swami and Chandra (S-C) model was developed to predict the influence of the surrounding environment on the air infiltration rate. Two buildings in Dalian, China, were selected: one with a simple surrounding environment and the other with a complex surrounding environment; their air infiltration rates were measured. The test results were used to validate the accuracy of the air infiltration rate solution models in different urban environments. For the building with a simple environment, the difference between the simulation and experimental results was 0.86%–22.52%. For the building with a complex environment, this difference ranged from 17.42% to 159.28%. We found that most traditional models provide accurate results for buildings with simple surrounding and that the simulation results widely vary for buildings with complex surrounding. The results of the method of combining CFD with the S-C model were more accurate, and the relative error between the simulation and test results was 10.61%. The results indicate that the environment around the building should be fully considered when calculating the air infiltration rate. The results of this study can guide the application of methods of determining air infiltration rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Simulation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1118-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1118-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑物的空气渗透率对室内环境和能源消耗有很大影响。本研究比较了几种确定空气渗透率的传统方法,并考察了它们在不同情况下的准确性。此外,还开发了一种将计算流动动力学(CFD)与 Swami 和 Chandra(S-C)模型相结合的方法,用于预测周围环境对空气渗透率的影响。在中国大连选择了两栋建筑:一栋周围环境简单,另一栋周围环境复杂,并测量了它们的空气渗透率。测试结果用于验证不同城市环境下空气渗透率求解模型的准确性。对于环境简单的建筑,模拟结果与实验结果的差异为 0.86%-22.52%。而对于环境复杂的建筑,这一差异在 17.42% 到 159.28% 之间。我们发现,大多数传统模型都能为周围环境简单的建筑提供准确的结果,而对于周围环境复杂的建筑,模拟结果则存在很大差异。将 CFD 与 S-C 模型相结合的方法结果更为准确,模拟结果与测试结果的相对误差为 10.61%。结果表明,在计算空气渗透率时,应充分考虑建筑物周围的环境。本研究的结果可以指导确定空气渗透率方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of models to predict air infiltration rate of buildings with different surrounding environments

The air infiltration rate of buildings strongly influences indoor environment and energy consumption. In this study, several traditional methods for determining the air infiltration rate were compared, and their accuracy in different scenarios was examined. Additionally, a method combining computational flow dynamics (CFD) with the Swami and Chandra (S-C) model was developed to predict the influence of the surrounding environment on the air infiltration rate. Two buildings in Dalian, China, were selected: one with a simple surrounding environment and the other with a complex surrounding environment; their air infiltration rates were measured. The test results were used to validate the accuracy of the air infiltration rate solution models in different urban environments. For the building with a simple environment, the difference between the simulation and experimental results was 0.86%–22.52%. For the building with a complex environment, this difference ranged from 17.42% to 159.28%. We found that most traditional models provide accurate results for buildings with simple surrounding and that the simulation results widely vary for buildings with complex surrounding. The results of the method of combining CFD with the S-C model were more accurate, and the relative error between the simulation and test results was 10.61%. The results indicate that the environment around the building should be fully considered when calculating the air infiltration rate. The results of this study can guide the application of methods of determining air infiltration rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building Simulation
Building Simulation THERMODYNAMICS-CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
16.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Building Simulation: An International Journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research papers and review articles dealing with modeling and simulation of buildings including their systems. The goal is to promote the field of building science and technology to such a level that modeling will eventually be used in every aspect of building construction as a routine instead of an exception. Of particular interest are papers that reflect recent developments and applications of modeling tools and their impact on advances of building science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信