{"title":"基于深度学习的地震采集面波频散曲线提取方法","authors":"Danilo Chamorro, Jiahua Zhao, Claire Birnie, Myrna Staring, Moritz Fliedner, Matteo Ravasi","doi":"10.1002/nsg.12298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves is a seismic method employed to obtain useful information about shear‐wave velocities in the near surface. A fundamental step in this methodology is the extraction of dispersion curves from dispersion spectra, with the latter usually obtained by applying specific processing algorithms onto the recorded shot gathers. Although the extraction process can be automated to some extent, it usually requires extensive quality control, which can be arduous for large datasets. We present a novel approach that leverages deep learning to identify a direct mapping between seismic shot gathers and their associated dispersion curves (both fundamental and first higher order modes), therefore by‐passing the need to compute dispersion spectra. Given a site of interest, a set of 1D compressional and shear velocities and density models are created using prior knowledge of the local geology; pairs of seismic shot gathers and Rayleigh‐wave phase dispersion curves are then numerically modelled and used to train a simplified residual network. The proposed approach is shown to achieve high‐quality predictions of dispersion curves on a synthetic test dataset and is, ultimately, successfully deployed on a field dataset. Various uncertainty quantification and convolutional neural network visualization techniques are also presented to assess the quality of the inference process and better understand the underlying learning process of the network. The predicted dispersion curves are inverted for both the synthetic and field data; in the latter case, the resulting shear‐wave velocity model is plausible and consistent with prior geological knowledge of the area. Finally, a comparison between the manually picked fundamental modes with the predictions from our model allows for a benchmark of the performance of the proposed workflow.","PeriodicalId":49771,"journal":{"name":"Near Surface Geophysics","volume":"165 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning‐based extraction of surface wave dispersion curves from seismic shot gathers\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Chamorro, Jiahua Zhao, Claire Birnie, Myrna Staring, Moritz Fliedner, Matteo Ravasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nsg.12298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves is a seismic method employed to obtain useful information about shear‐wave velocities in the near surface. A fundamental step in this methodology is the extraction of dispersion curves from dispersion spectra, with the latter usually obtained by applying specific processing algorithms onto the recorded shot gathers. Although the extraction process can be automated to some extent, it usually requires extensive quality control, which can be arduous for large datasets. We present a novel approach that leverages deep learning to identify a direct mapping between seismic shot gathers and their associated dispersion curves (both fundamental and first higher order modes), therefore by‐passing the need to compute dispersion spectra. Given a site of interest, a set of 1D compressional and shear velocities and density models are created using prior knowledge of the local geology; pairs of seismic shot gathers and Rayleigh‐wave phase dispersion curves are then numerically modelled and used to train a simplified residual network. The proposed approach is shown to achieve high‐quality predictions of dispersion curves on a synthetic test dataset and is, ultimately, successfully deployed on a field dataset. Various uncertainty quantification and convolutional neural network visualization techniques are also presented to assess the quality of the inference process and better understand the underlying learning process of the network. The predicted dispersion curves are inverted for both the synthetic and field data; in the latter case, the resulting shear‐wave velocity model is plausible and consistent with prior geological knowledge of the area. Finally, a comparison between the manually picked fundamental modes with the predictions from our model allows for a benchmark of the performance of the proposed workflow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Near Surface Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12298\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Near Surface Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep learning‐based extraction of surface wave dispersion curves from seismic shot gathers
Multi‐channel analysis of surface waves is a seismic method employed to obtain useful information about shear‐wave velocities in the near surface. A fundamental step in this methodology is the extraction of dispersion curves from dispersion spectra, with the latter usually obtained by applying specific processing algorithms onto the recorded shot gathers. Although the extraction process can be automated to some extent, it usually requires extensive quality control, which can be arduous for large datasets. We present a novel approach that leverages deep learning to identify a direct mapping between seismic shot gathers and their associated dispersion curves (both fundamental and first higher order modes), therefore by‐passing the need to compute dispersion spectra. Given a site of interest, a set of 1D compressional and shear velocities and density models are created using prior knowledge of the local geology; pairs of seismic shot gathers and Rayleigh‐wave phase dispersion curves are then numerically modelled and used to train a simplified residual network. The proposed approach is shown to achieve high‐quality predictions of dispersion curves on a synthetic test dataset and is, ultimately, successfully deployed on a field dataset. Various uncertainty quantification and convolutional neural network visualization techniques are also presented to assess the quality of the inference process and better understand the underlying learning process of the network. The predicted dispersion curves are inverted for both the synthetic and field data; in the latter case, the resulting shear‐wave velocity model is plausible and consistent with prior geological knowledge of the area. Finally, a comparison between the manually picked fundamental modes with the predictions from our model allows for a benchmark of the performance of the proposed workflow.
期刊介绍:
Near Surface Geophysics is an international journal for the publication of research and development in geophysics applied to near surface. It places emphasis on geological, hydrogeological, geotechnical, environmental, engineering, mining, archaeological, agricultural and other applications of geophysics as well as physical soil and rock properties. Geophysical and geoscientific case histories with innovative use of geophysical techniques are welcome, which may include improvements on instrumentation, measurements, data acquisition and processing, modelling, inversion, interpretation, project management and multidisciplinary use. The papers should also be understandable to those who use geophysical data but are not necessarily geophysicists.