利用 Elixhauser 合并症预测接受单支和多支冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的院内死亡率

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Renxi Li , Stephen Huddleston
{"title":"利用 Elixhauser 合并症预测接受单支和多支冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的院内死亡率","authors":"Renxi Li ,&nbsp;Stephen Huddleston","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk surgery. Cardiovascular diseases are strongly associated with comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the prediction of in-hospital mortality by comorbidities in patients who underwent CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract patients who received 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG between Q4 2015 and 2020. Best-fit model by logistic regressions was used to predict in-hospital mortality by Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Moreover, age was adjusted in ECI prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 190,524, 83,725, 48,147, and 13,540 patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG, respectively. In-hospital mortality was best predicted by ECI in 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.62–0.65), followed by 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.60–0.66), 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63), and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63). After adjusting for age, ECI adequately predicted in-hospital mortality in 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.69–0.75) and 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.68–0.71). Predictive powers for age-adjusted ECI were comparable in 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic=0.67, 95 % CI = 0.66–0.68) and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.65–0.68).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ECI was a moderate (<em>c</em>-statistic 0.6–0.7) predictor of in-hospital mortality in all CABG. Age-adjusted ECI could effectively predict in-hospital mortality, especially in patients who underwent 3 and 4+ CABG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000135/pdfft?md5=b5189c977c86c425a945bd1d04e9c41a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000135-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting in-hospital mortality using Elixhauser comorbidity in patients underwent single and multiple coronary artery bypass surgery\",\"authors\":\"Renxi Li ,&nbsp;Stephen Huddleston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk surgery. Cardiovascular diseases are strongly associated with comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the prediction of in-hospital mortality by comorbidities in patients who underwent CABG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract patients who received 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG between Q4 2015 and 2020. Best-fit model by logistic regressions was used to predict in-hospital mortality by Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Moreover, age was adjusted in ECI prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 190,524, 83,725, 48,147, and 13,540 patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG, respectively. In-hospital mortality was best predicted by ECI in 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.62–0.65), followed by 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.60–0.66), 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63), and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63). After adjusting for age, ECI adequately predicted in-hospital mortality in 4+ CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.69–0.75) and 3 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.68–0.71). Predictive powers for age-adjusted ECI were comparable in 1 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic=0.67, 95 % CI = 0.66–0.68) and 2 CABG (<em>c</em>-statistic = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.65–0.68).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ECI was a moderate (<em>c</em>-statistic 0.6–0.7) predictor of in-hospital mortality in all CABG. Age-adjusted ECI could effectively predict in-hospital mortality, especially in patients who underwent 3 and 4+ CABG.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000135/pdfft?md5=b5189c977c86c425a945bd1d04e9c41a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000135-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种高风险手术。心血管疾病与合并症密切相关。本研究旨在评估合并症对接受 CABG 患者院内死亡率的预测。方法使用全国住院患者抽样数据库,提取 2015 年第四季度至 2020 年期间接受 1、2、3 和 4+ CABG 的患者。采用逻辑回归的最佳拟合模型,通过艾利克肖瑟疾病指数(ECI)预测院内死亡率。结果接受 1、2、3 和 4+ CABG 的患者人数分别为 190524、83725、48147 和 13540 人。在 3 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.63,95 % CI = 0.62-0.65)、4 次以上 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.63,95 % CI = 0.60-0.66)、1 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.62,95 % CI = 0.61-0.63)和 2 次 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.62,95 % CI = 0.61-0.63)中,ECI 对院内死亡率的预测效果最佳。对年龄进行调整后,ECI 可充分预测 4+ CABG(c-统计量 = 0.72,95 % CI = 0.69-0.75)和 3 CABG(c-统计量 = 0.69,95 % CI = 0.68-0.71)的院内死亡率。在 1 次 CABG(c-统计量=0.67,95% CI = 0.66-0.68)和 2 次 CABG(c-统计量=0.67,95% CI = 0.65-0.68)中,年龄调整后 ECI 的预测能力相当。年龄调整后的ECI可有效预测院内死亡率,尤其是接受3次和4次以上CABG的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting in-hospital mortality using Elixhauser comorbidity in patients underwent single and multiple coronary artery bypass surgery

Background

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk surgery. Cardiovascular diseases are strongly associated with comorbidities. This study aimed to assess the prediction of in-hospital mortality by comorbidities in patients who underwent CABG.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample database was used to extract patients who received 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG between Q4 2015 and 2020. Best-fit model by logistic regressions was used to predict in-hospital mortality by Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI). Moreover, age was adjusted in ECI prediction.

Results

There were 190,524, 83,725, 48,147, and 13,540 patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4+ CABG, respectively. In-hospital mortality was best predicted by ECI in 3 CABG (c-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.62–0.65), followed by 4+ CABG (c-statistic = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.60–0.66), 1 CABG (c-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63), and 2 CABG (c-statistic = 0.62, 95 % CI = 0.61–0.63). After adjusting for age, ECI adequately predicted in-hospital mortality in 4+ CABG (c-statistic = 0.72, 95 % CI = 0.69–0.75) and 3 CABG (c-statistic = 0.69, 95 % CI = 0.68–0.71). Predictive powers for age-adjusted ECI were comparable in 1 CABG (c-statistic=0.67, 95 % CI = 0.66–0.68) and 2 CABG (c-statistic = 0.67, 95 % CI = 0.65–0.68).

Conclusions

ECI was a moderate (c-statistic 0.6–0.7) predictor of in-hospital mortality in all CABG. Age-adjusted ECI could effectively predict in-hospital mortality, especially in patients who underwent 3 and 4+ CABG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信