寄宿制是否会影响住院医师的教育?一项针对急诊医学项目主任的全国调查

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Katja Goldflam MD, Cassandra Bradby MD, Ryan F. Coughlin MD, Alexis Cordone MD, Jessica Bod MD, Leah Bright DO, Rebecca Merrill MD, Alina Tsyrulnik MD
{"title":"寄宿制是否会影响住院医师的教育?一项针对急诊医学项目主任的全国调查","authors":"Katja Goldflam MD,&nbsp;Cassandra Bradby MD,&nbsp;Ryan F. Coughlin MD,&nbsp;Alexis Cordone MD,&nbsp;Jessica Bod MD,&nbsp;Leah Bright DO,&nbsp;Rebecca Merrill MD,&nbsp;Alina Tsyrulnik MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting “a little,” “a moderate amount,” “a lot,” and “a great deal,” respectively, and 5% noting “no effect at all.” Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a “somewhat positive” effect. Most noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a “somewhat” or “extremely positive” effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is boarding compromising our residents' education? A national survey of emergency medicine program directors\",\"authors\":\"Katja Goldflam MD,&nbsp;Cassandra Bradby MD,&nbsp;Ryan F. Coughlin MD,&nbsp;Alexis Cordone MD,&nbsp;Jessica Bod MD,&nbsp;Leah Bright DO,&nbsp;Rebecca Merrill MD,&nbsp;Alina Tsyrulnik MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting “a little,” “a moderate amount,” “a lot,” and “a great deal,” respectively, and 5% noting “no effect at all.” Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a “somewhat positive” effect. Most noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a “somewhat” or “extremely positive” effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在急诊科(ED)寄宿病人可能会影响住院医师的教育。项目主任(PD)对寄宿制对其学员的影响的看法以前还没有描述过。 方法 我们采用混合方法对急诊科项目主任进行了横向方便抽样调查,以了解他们对寄宿制如何影响住院医师培训的看法。描述性数据以百分比形式报告,差异采用皮尔逊卡方检验(P< 0.05为显著)计算。采用框架模型对自由文本回答进行定性分析。 结果 共收集到 170 份回复,回复率为 63%。大多数受访者认为寄宿对住院医师教育至少有一些影响,分别有 29%、35%、18% 和 12% 的受访者表示 "有一点"、"适度"、"很多 "和 "很大",5% 的受访者表示 "完全没有影响"。受访者认为寄宿制对住院医师教育和培训有负面影响,80%的受访者表示 "有点 "或 "非常负面",18%的受访者表示 "中性",2%的受访者表示 "有点正面"。大多数人指出,在管理急诊室吞吐量(70%)和高患者量(66%)方面,住院医师教育受到了 "一定程度 "或 "极其负面 "的影响。54%的人认为对参与未分化病人的初步检查有 "一定程度上 "或 "极为不利 "的影响。32%的人认为对学习管理危重病人有 "一些 "或 "极其积极 "的影响。对挑战、缓解策略和住院医师反馈的定性分析强调了住院医师缺乏管理科室患者流程的经验、对床旁教学的影响以及住院医师人员配备需要灵活性。 结论 大多数住院医师都认为寄宿会对住院医师教育产生负面影响,并提出了几种减轻影响的策略。这些发现有助于为未来的干预措施提供依据,从而在急诊室寄宿率高的复杂教育环境中优化住院医师的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is boarding compromising our residents' education? A national survey of emergency medicine program directors

Background

Boarding patients in the emergency department (ED) potentially affects resident education. Program director (PD) perceptions of the impact of boarding on their trainees have not been previously described.

Methods

We surveyed a cross-sectional convenience sample of emergency medicine PDs using a mixed-methods approach to explore their perceptions of how boarding has affected their residents' training. Descriptive data were reported as percentages and differences were calculated using Pearson's chi-square test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. A framework model was used to qualitatively analyze free-text responses.

Results

A total of 170 responses were collected, for a response rate of 63%. Most respondents felt that boarding had at least some effect on resident education with 29%, 35%, 18%, and 12% noting “a little,” “a moderate amount,” “a lot,” and “a great deal,” respectively, and 5% noting “no effect at all.” Respondents perceived a negative impact of boarding on resident education and training, with 80% reporting a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect, 18% feeling neutral, and 2% noting a “somewhat positive” effect. Most noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” effect on resident education in managing ED throughput (70%) and high patient volumes (66%). Fifty-four percent noted a “somewhat” or “extremely negative” impact on being involved in the initial workup of undifferentiated patients. Thirty-two percent saw a “somewhat” or “extremely positive” effect on learning the management of critically ill patients. Qualitative analysis of challenges, mitigation strategies, and resident feedback emphasized the lack of exposure to managing departmental patient flow, impact on bedside teaching, and need for flexibility in resident staffing.

Conclusions

Most PDs agree that boarding negatively affects resident education and identify several strategies to mitigate the impact. These findings can help inform future interventions to optimize resident learning in the complex educational landscape of high ED boarding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信