{"title":"不同网络条件下著名虚拟同步发电机策略的比较分析","authors":"Chalitha Liyanage;Inam Nutkani;Lasantha Meegahapola","doi":"10.1109/OAJPE.2024.3384354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.","PeriodicalId":56187,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10488377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Chalitha Liyanage;Inam Nutkani;Lasantha Meegahapola\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OAJPE.2024.3384354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10488377\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10488377/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Analysis of Prominent Virtual Synchronous Generator Strategies Under Different Network Conditions
The virtual synchronous generator (VSG) is the most widely used grid-forming inverter (GFMI) control technique. The VSG can provide enhanced ancillary services and improved dynamic response compared to conventional synchronous generators and grid-following inverters (GFLIs). Developing an improved understanding of VSG strategies is vital to deploy them in the appropriate context in power grids. Therefore, this paper provides a rigorous comparative performance analysis of prominent VSG strategies (e.g., ISE-Lab, synchronverter, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) model, and power synchronisation control (PSC)) under different network conditions (e.g., X/R ratios, network faults, and load types). Dynamic simulation studies have been carried out using a simplified test system to assess the performance of VSG models. Furthermore, comprehensive mathematical models of VSGs have been derived in order to verify the simulation results through a frequency domain stability analysis. Moreover, the offline simulation platform results have been validated in real-time using the IEEE-39 bus network on the OPAL-RT platform. According to the analysis, the synchronverter-based VSGs perform much better under low X/R ratios, fault conditions, and dynamic loads. Hence, they are more suitable for distribution grids and load centres with a high share of dynamic loads.