从矿物和海洋沉积物中回收短 DNA 片段:评估裂解和分离方法的比较研究

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1002/edn3.547
Darjan Gande, Christiane Hassenrück, Marina Žure, Tim Richter-Heitmann, Eske Willerslev, Michael W. Friedrich
{"title":"从矿物和海洋沉积物中回收短 DNA 片段:评估裂解和分离方法的比较研究","authors":"Darjan Gande,&nbsp;Christiane Hassenrück,&nbsp;Marina Žure,&nbsp;Tim Richter-Heitmann,&nbsp;Eske Willerslev,&nbsp;Michael W. Friedrich","doi":"10.1002/edn3.547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine sediments as excellent climate archives, contain among other biomolecules substantial amounts of extracellular DNA. Through mineral binding, some of the DNA remains protected from degradation which aids its preservation. While this pool of DNA represents genomic ecosystem fingerprints spanning over millions of years, the capability of current DNA extraction methods in recovering mineral-bound DNA remains poorly understood. We evaluated current sedimentary DNA extraction approaches and their ability to recover short DNA fragments from artificially created DNA-mineral complexes involving pure clay minerals or quartz, as well as from different types of natural marine sediments. We separately investigated lysis (DNA release) and isolation steps (purification of DNA) comparing five different lysis buffers across two commonly used DNA isolation approaches: silica magnetic beads and liquid-phase organic extraction and purification. The choice of lysis buffer significantly impacted the amount of recovered mineral-bound DNA and facilitated selective desorption of DNA fragments. High molarity EDTA and phosphate lysis buffers recovered on average an order of magnitude more DNA from clay minerals than other tested buffers, while both isolation approaches recovered comparable amounts of DNA. In marine sediments, however, liquid-phase organic extraction caused inhibitory effects in subsequent downstream applications (e.g., PCR), across all assessed DNA extracts, while silica magnetic beads induced inhibition only in half of the tested DNA extracts. Thus, the isolation approach, together with the lysis buffer, played a decisive role in successful library preparation with lysis buffer choice ultimately impacting final library fragment distribution. With this study, we underscore the critical importance of lysis buffer selection to maximize the recovery of mineral-bound DNA and show its profound impact on recovered fragment lengths in sedimentary DNA extractions, a crucial factor alongside existing isolation approaches in facilitating high-quality DNA extracts for downstream analysis related to ancient environmental DNA research.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.547","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering short DNA fragments from minerals and marine sediments: A comparative study evaluating lysis and isolation approaches\",\"authors\":\"Darjan Gande,&nbsp;Christiane Hassenrück,&nbsp;Marina Žure,&nbsp;Tim Richter-Heitmann,&nbsp;Eske Willerslev,&nbsp;Michael W. Friedrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Marine sediments as excellent climate archives, contain among other biomolecules substantial amounts of extracellular DNA. Through mineral binding, some of the DNA remains protected from degradation which aids its preservation. While this pool of DNA represents genomic ecosystem fingerprints spanning over millions of years, the capability of current DNA extraction methods in recovering mineral-bound DNA remains poorly understood. We evaluated current sedimentary DNA extraction approaches and their ability to recover short DNA fragments from artificially created DNA-mineral complexes involving pure clay minerals or quartz, as well as from different types of natural marine sediments. We separately investigated lysis (DNA release) and isolation steps (purification of DNA) comparing five different lysis buffers across two commonly used DNA isolation approaches: silica magnetic beads and liquid-phase organic extraction and purification. The choice of lysis buffer significantly impacted the amount of recovered mineral-bound DNA and facilitated selective desorption of DNA fragments. High molarity EDTA and phosphate lysis buffers recovered on average an order of magnitude more DNA from clay minerals than other tested buffers, while both isolation approaches recovered comparable amounts of DNA. In marine sediments, however, liquid-phase organic extraction caused inhibitory effects in subsequent downstream applications (e.g., PCR), across all assessed DNA extracts, while silica magnetic beads induced inhibition only in half of the tested DNA extracts. Thus, the isolation approach, together with the lysis buffer, played a decisive role in successful library preparation with lysis buffer choice ultimately impacting final library fragment distribution. With this study, we underscore the critical importance of lysis buffer selection to maximize the recovery of mineral-bound DNA and show its profound impact on recovered fragment lengths in sedimentary DNA extractions, a crucial factor alongside existing isolation approaches in facilitating high-quality DNA extracts for downstream analysis related to ancient environmental DNA research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.547\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋沉积物是绝佳的气候档案,除其他生物大分子外,还含有大量的细胞外 DNA。通过矿物质的结合,部分 DNA 仍然受到保护而不会降解,这有助于其保存。虽然这一 DNA 库代表了跨越数百万年的基因组生态系统指纹,但目前的 DNA 提取方法在回收矿物质结合 DNA 方面的能力仍鲜为人知。我们评估了目前的沉积 DNA 提取方法及其从人工制造的 DNA 矿物复合物(包括纯粘土矿物或石英)以及不同类型的天然海洋沉积物中回收短 DNA 片段的能力。我们分别研究了裂解(DNA 释放)和分离步骤(DNA 纯化),比较了两种常用 DNA 分离方法(硅胶磁珠和液相有机提取与纯化)中五种不同的裂解缓冲液。裂解缓冲液的选择极大地影响了矿物结合 DNA 的回收量,并促进了 DNA 片段的选择性解吸。高浓度乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和磷酸盐裂解缓冲液从粘土矿物中回收的DNA平均比其他测试缓冲液多一个数量级,而两种分离方法回收的DNA数量相当。不过,在海洋沉积物中,液相有机萃取法会对所有受测 DNA 提取物的后续下游应用(如 PCR)产生抑制作用,而硅胶磁珠只对半数受测 DNA 提取物产生抑制作用。因此,分离方法和裂解缓冲液对文库的成功制备起着决定性作用,而裂解缓冲液的选择最终会影响最终文库片段的分布。通过这项研究,我们强调了选择裂解缓冲液对最大限度地回收矿物质结合 DNA 的重要性,并展示了其对沉积 DNA 提取中回收片段长度的深远影响,这是现有分离方法的一个关键因素,有助于为古代环境 DNA 研究的下游分析提供高质量的 DNA 提取物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recovering short DNA fragments from minerals and marine sediments: A comparative study evaluating lysis and isolation approaches

Recovering short DNA fragments from minerals and marine sediments: A comparative study evaluating lysis and isolation approaches

Marine sediments as excellent climate archives, contain among other biomolecules substantial amounts of extracellular DNA. Through mineral binding, some of the DNA remains protected from degradation which aids its preservation. While this pool of DNA represents genomic ecosystem fingerprints spanning over millions of years, the capability of current DNA extraction methods in recovering mineral-bound DNA remains poorly understood. We evaluated current sedimentary DNA extraction approaches and their ability to recover short DNA fragments from artificially created DNA-mineral complexes involving pure clay minerals or quartz, as well as from different types of natural marine sediments. We separately investigated lysis (DNA release) and isolation steps (purification of DNA) comparing five different lysis buffers across two commonly used DNA isolation approaches: silica magnetic beads and liquid-phase organic extraction and purification. The choice of lysis buffer significantly impacted the amount of recovered mineral-bound DNA and facilitated selective desorption of DNA fragments. High molarity EDTA and phosphate lysis buffers recovered on average an order of magnitude more DNA from clay minerals than other tested buffers, while both isolation approaches recovered comparable amounts of DNA. In marine sediments, however, liquid-phase organic extraction caused inhibitory effects in subsequent downstream applications (e.g., PCR), across all assessed DNA extracts, while silica magnetic beads induced inhibition only in half of the tested DNA extracts. Thus, the isolation approach, together with the lysis buffer, played a decisive role in successful library preparation with lysis buffer choice ultimately impacting final library fragment distribution. With this study, we underscore the critical importance of lysis buffer selection to maximize the recovery of mineral-bound DNA and show its profound impact on recovered fragment lengths in sedimentary DNA extractions, a crucial factor alongside existing isolation approaches in facilitating high-quality DNA extracts for downstream analysis related to ancient environmental DNA research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信