开发整体人工智能素养评估矩阵--衔接通用能力、特定领域能力和道德能力

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nils Knoth , Marie Decker , Matthias Carl Laupichler , Marc Pinski , Nils Buchholtz , Katharina Bata , Ben Schultz
{"title":"开发整体人工智能素养评估矩阵--衔接通用能力、特定领域能力和道德能力","authors":"Nils Knoth ,&nbsp;Marie Decker ,&nbsp;Matthias Carl Laupichler ,&nbsp;Marc Pinski ,&nbsp;Nils Buchholtz ,&nbsp;Katharina Bata ,&nbsp;Ben Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motivated by a holistic understanding of AI literacy, this work presents an interdisciplinary effort to make AI literacy measurable in a comprehensive way, considering generic and domain-specific AI literacy as well as AI ethics. While many AI literacy assessment tools have been developed in the last 2-3 years, mostly in the form of self-assessment scales and less frequently as knowledge-based assessments, previous approaches only accounted for one specific area of a comprehensive understanding of AI competence, namely cognitive aspects within generic AI literacy. Considering the demand for AI literacy development for different professional domains and reflecting on the concept of competence in a way that goes beyond mere cognitive aspects of conceptual knowledge, there is an urgent need for assessment methods that capture domain-specific AI literacy on each of the three competence dimensions of cognition, behavior, and attitude. In addition, competencies for AI ethics are becoming more apparent, which further calls for a comprehensive assessment of AI literacy for this very matter. This conceptual paper aims to provide a foundation upon which future AI literacy assessment instruments can be built and provides insights into what a framework for item development might look like that addresses both generic and domain-specific aspects of AI literacy as well as AI ethics literacy, and measures more than just knowledge-related aspects based on a holistic approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000181/pdfft?md5=a1122436ed868a24f0d1c12929ca5cf6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000181-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a holistic AI literacy assessment matrix – Bridging generic, domain-specific, and ethical competencies\",\"authors\":\"Nils Knoth ,&nbsp;Marie Decker ,&nbsp;Matthias Carl Laupichler ,&nbsp;Marc Pinski ,&nbsp;Nils Buchholtz ,&nbsp;Katharina Bata ,&nbsp;Ben Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Motivated by a holistic understanding of AI literacy, this work presents an interdisciplinary effort to make AI literacy measurable in a comprehensive way, considering generic and domain-specific AI literacy as well as AI ethics. While many AI literacy assessment tools have been developed in the last 2-3 years, mostly in the form of self-assessment scales and less frequently as knowledge-based assessments, previous approaches only accounted for one specific area of a comprehensive understanding of AI competence, namely cognitive aspects within generic AI literacy. Considering the demand for AI literacy development for different professional domains and reflecting on the concept of competence in a way that goes beyond mere cognitive aspects of conceptual knowledge, there is an urgent need for assessment methods that capture domain-specific AI literacy on each of the three competence dimensions of cognition, behavior, and attitude. In addition, competencies for AI ethics are becoming more apparent, which further calls for a comprehensive assessment of AI literacy for this very matter. This conceptual paper aims to provide a foundation upon which future AI literacy assessment instruments can be built and provides insights into what a framework for item development might look like that addresses both generic and domain-specific aspects of AI literacy as well as AI ethics literacy, and measures more than just knowledge-related aspects based on a holistic approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000181/pdfft?md5=a1122436ed868a24f0d1c12929ca5cf6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000181-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出于对人工智能素养的全面理解,这项工作提出了一种跨学科的努力,以全面的方式对人工智能素养进行测量,同时考虑通用和特定领域的人工智能素养以及人工智能伦理。虽然在过去两三年里已经开发出许多人工智能素养评估工具,但大多采用自评量表的形式,较少采用基于知识的评估,以往的方法只考虑了全面了解人工智能能力的一个特定领域,即通用人工智能素养中的认知方面。考虑到不同专业领域对人工智能素养发展的需求,以及对能力概念超越单纯的概念性知识认知方面的反思,迫切需要在认知、行为和态度这三个能力维度中的每一个维度上捕捉特定领域人工智能素养的评估方法。此外,人工智能伦理方面的能力也越来越明显,这进一步要求对人工智能素养进行全面评估。这篇概念性论文旨在为未来的人工智能素养评估工具提供一个基础,并为项目开发框架提供见解,该框架可同时解决人工智能素养和人工智能伦理素养的通用和特定领域问题,并基于整体方法测量与知识相关的更多方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a holistic AI literacy assessment matrix – Bridging generic, domain-specific, and ethical competencies

Motivated by a holistic understanding of AI literacy, this work presents an interdisciplinary effort to make AI literacy measurable in a comprehensive way, considering generic and domain-specific AI literacy as well as AI ethics. While many AI literacy assessment tools have been developed in the last 2-3 years, mostly in the form of self-assessment scales and less frequently as knowledge-based assessments, previous approaches only accounted for one specific area of a comprehensive understanding of AI competence, namely cognitive aspects within generic AI literacy. Considering the demand for AI literacy development for different professional domains and reflecting on the concept of competence in a way that goes beyond mere cognitive aspects of conceptual knowledge, there is an urgent need for assessment methods that capture domain-specific AI literacy on each of the three competence dimensions of cognition, behavior, and attitude. In addition, competencies for AI ethics are becoming more apparent, which further calls for a comprehensive assessment of AI literacy for this very matter. This conceptual paper aims to provide a foundation upon which future AI literacy assessment instruments can be built and provides insights into what a framework for item development might look like that addresses both generic and domain-specific aspects of AI literacy as well as AI ethics literacy, and measures more than just knowledge-related aspects based on a holistic approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信