职业学校十年级谈判课文的终结性评价重构

Faridhatun Nikmah, Chici Al Wafiq, Affan Ghaffar Ahmad, Nasik Hidayah, Mely Wulandari, W. Wagiran, Deby Luriawati Naryatmojo
{"title":"职业学校十年级谈判课文的终结性评价重构","authors":"Faridhatun Nikmah, Chici Al Wafiq, Affan Ghaffar Ahmad, Nasik Hidayah, Mely Wulandari, W. Wagiran, Deby Luriawati Naryatmojo","doi":"10.26877/ijre.v4i1.15286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to determine the quality of summative assessment tests in three modules of negotiation texts class X SMK at the vocational level. The quality of the questions is very influential on the results  of achieving the learning objectives of students as a basis for determining class increase or graduation from educational units. This research was conducted by analyzing (1) assessment qualifications in the module, (2) the level of difficulty of the questions, and (3) the cognitive level of the questions. The method used in this study is qualitative method with techniques by interviews and literature studies. The results showed that the application of summative assessment at SMKN 1 Bangil used more C4 reaching 50%. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. At SMKN 2 Purwosari shows more dominant use of C2 in the form of understanding of problems that have been learned in previous learning. This indicates the need for cognitive improvement in the problem to achieve balance. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. Furthermore, in the SMKN 2 Jepara module, more operational verbs use to apply (C3) and create (C6) which reaches a percentage of 26.7%. Through this analysis, there are several problems that have not been balanced in difficulty and cognitive levels and there needs to be reconstruction to achieve better student learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":518457,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Education","volume":"300 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Summative Assessment Reconstruction on Negotiation Text for the Tenth Grade in Vocational School\",\"authors\":\"Faridhatun Nikmah, Chici Al Wafiq, Affan Ghaffar Ahmad, Nasik Hidayah, Mely Wulandari, W. Wagiran, Deby Luriawati Naryatmojo\",\"doi\":\"10.26877/ijre.v4i1.15286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research was to determine the quality of summative assessment tests in three modules of negotiation texts class X SMK at the vocational level. The quality of the questions is very influential on the results  of achieving the learning objectives of students as a basis for determining class increase or graduation from educational units. This research was conducted by analyzing (1) assessment qualifications in the module, (2) the level of difficulty of the questions, and (3) the cognitive level of the questions. The method used in this study is qualitative method with techniques by interviews and literature studies. The results showed that the application of summative assessment at SMKN 1 Bangil used more C4 reaching 50%. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. At SMKN 2 Purwosari shows more dominant use of C2 in the form of understanding of problems that have been learned in previous learning. This indicates the need for cognitive improvement in the problem to achieve balance. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. Furthermore, in the SMKN 2 Jepara module, more operational verbs use to apply (C3) and create (C6) which reaches a percentage of 26.7%. Through this analysis, there are several problems that have not been balanced in difficulty and cognitive levels and there needs to be reconstruction to achieve better student learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"300 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i1.15286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i1.15286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定职业教育阶段第十班(SMK)谈判课文三个模块中终结性评估测试的质量。试题质量对学生实现学习目标的结果影响很大,是决定学生升班或从教育单位毕业的依据。本研究通过分析(1)模块中的评估资格,(2)问题的难易程度,(3)问题的认知水平来进行。本研究采用的方法是定性方法,包括访谈和文献研究等技术。结果表明,SMKN 1 Bangil 的终结性评价使用了较多的 C4,达到 50%。此外,问题的难度被归类为 "好",因为中等难度达到了 50%。在 SMKN 2 Purwosari,C2 的使用更占优势,表现为对以前学习中已学过的问题的理解。这表明需要提高对问题的认知,以达到平衡。此外,问题的难度水平被归类为良好,因为中等难度水平达到了 50%。此外,在SMKN 2哲帕拉模块中,更多的运算动词用于应用(C3)和创建(C6),比例达到26.7%。通过以上分析,有几个问题在难度和认知水平上没有达到平衡,需要进行重建,以达到更好的学生学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Summative Assessment Reconstruction on Negotiation Text for the Tenth Grade in Vocational School
The purpose of this research was to determine the quality of summative assessment tests in three modules of negotiation texts class X SMK at the vocational level. The quality of the questions is very influential on the results  of achieving the learning objectives of students as a basis for determining class increase or graduation from educational units. This research was conducted by analyzing (1) assessment qualifications in the module, (2) the level of difficulty of the questions, and (3) the cognitive level of the questions. The method used in this study is qualitative method with techniques by interviews and literature studies. The results showed that the application of summative assessment at SMKN 1 Bangil used more C4 reaching 50%. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. At SMKN 2 Purwosari shows more dominant use of C2 in the form of understanding of problems that have been learned in previous learning. This indicates the need for cognitive improvement in the problem to achieve balance. In addition, the difficulty level of the questions is categorized as good because the medium level has reached 50%. Furthermore, in the SMKN 2 Jepara module, more operational verbs use to apply (C3) and create (C6) which reaches a percentage of 26.7%. Through this analysis, there are several problems that have not been balanced in difficulty and cognitive levels and there needs to be reconstruction to achieve better student learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信