互补 CMOS 逻辑类型之外的时序分析

J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif
{"title":"互补 CMOS 逻辑类型之外的时序分析","authors":"J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif","doi":"10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.","PeriodicalId":518586,"journal":{"name":"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","volume":"66 3","pages":"189-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing Analysis beyond Complementary CMOS Logic Styles\",\"authors\":\"J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"189-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着规模的不断扩大,器件密度持续增加,但功耗和散热预算阻碍了对所有可用器件的充分利用。因此,人们开始探索传统 CMOS 以外的其他电路样式,尤其是动态数据依赖型电路样式,但传统静态时序分析工具固有的过度悲观情绪阻碍了这种电路样式的采用。Pass-Transistor Logic(PTL)就是这样一个电路系列,它前景广阔,但与 CMOS 不同的是,传统的面向 CMOS 的 EDA 工具无法提供足够准确的性能估计。在这项工作中,我们重新审视了时序分析及其前提条件,并展示了一种经过显著改进的方法,即一种更通用的动态时序引擎,它能准确预测传统 CMOS 和 PTL 的时序性能,与 SPICE 相比,准确率提高了 4.0%,运行时间与传统门级仿真相当。与 SPICE 相比,运行时间提高了四个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing Analysis beyond Complementary CMOS Logic Styles
With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信