J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif
{"title":"互补 CMOS 逻辑类型之外的时序分析","authors":"J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif","doi":"10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.","PeriodicalId":518586,"journal":{"name":"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","volume":"66 3","pages":"189-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing Analysis beyond Complementary CMOS Logic Styles\",\"authors\":\"J. Lappas, Mohamed Amine Riahi, C. Weis, Norbert Wehn, Sani Nassif\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"189-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 29th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASP-DAC58780.2024.10473842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
With scaling unabated, device density continues to increase, but power and thermal budgets prevent the full use of all available devices. This leads to the exploration of alternative circuit styles beyond traditional CMOS, especially dynamic data-dependent styles, but the excessive pessimism inherent in conventional static timing analysis tools presents a barrier to adoption. One such circuit family is Pass-Transistor Logic (PTL), which holds significant promise but behaves differently from CMOS in that traditional CMOS-oriented EDA tools cannot produce sufficiently accurate performance estimates. In this work, we revisit timing analysis and its premises and show a significantly improved methodology of a more generalized dynamic timing engine that accurately predicts timing performance for traditional CMOS as well as PTL with an accuracy of 4.0% compared to SPICE and with a run-time comparable to traditional gate-level simulation. The run-time improvement compared with SPICE is four orders of magnitude.