利用目标矩阵和鱼骨图法分析中小型飞机复制品企业的生产率

Yasrin Zabidi, R. Pirdaus, Uyuunul Mauidzoh, Gunawan, M. Astuti, Riani Nurdin
{"title":"利用目标矩阵和鱼骨图法分析中小型飞机复制品企业的生产率","authors":"Yasrin Zabidi, R. Pirdaus, Uyuunul Mauidzoh, Gunawan, M. Astuti, Riani Nurdin","doi":"10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aircraft Replica SMEs have never known the level of productivity achieved because they have not carried out productivity measurements and analysis. This study aims to determine the level of productivity, the factors causing the decline in productivity, and provide suggestions for corrective actions. The methods used are OMAX and fishbone diagrams. There are five productivity ratios used. Ratios 1 and 4 are dominated by a very large number of bad productivity ratios. The lowest total productivity achievement occurred in July at 0, while the highest total productivity achievement occurred in February at 601.13. The index value of change in the achievement of total productivity to the best standard productivity occurred in February at 100.38%, while the worst value occurred in July at -100%. The best index value of changes to productivity in the previous period occurred in August at 395.15%, while the worst value occurred in July at - 100%. Corrective actions include optimizing rest hours so that at work they can concentrate even more, optimizing working hours so that no working hours are wasted, increasing the comfort of the workplace, optimizing all employees so that the results obtained can also be optimal, ensuring that production results achieved are always controlled, and motivating employees by giving bonuses to employees who perform well.","PeriodicalId":518932,"journal":{"name":"2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity Analysis Using the Objective Matrix and Fishbone Diagram Methods in SMEs of Airplane Replicas\",\"authors\":\"Yasrin Zabidi, R. Pirdaus, Uyuunul Mauidzoh, Gunawan, M. Astuti, Riani Nurdin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aircraft Replica SMEs have never known the level of productivity achieved because they have not carried out productivity measurements and analysis. This study aims to determine the level of productivity, the factors causing the decline in productivity, and provide suggestions for corrective actions. The methods used are OMAX and fishbone diagrams. There are five productivity ratios used. Ratios 1 and 4 are dominated by a very large number of bad productivity ratios. The lowest total productivity achievement occurred in July at 0, while the highest total productivity achievement occurred in February at 601.13. The index value of change in the achievement of total productivity to the best standard productivity occurred in February at 100.38%, while the worst value occurred in July at -100%. The best index value of changes to productivity in the previous period occurred in August at 395.15%, while the worst value occurred in July at - 100%. Corrective actions include optimizing rest hours so that at work they can concentrate even more, optimizing working hours so that no working hours are wasted, increasing the comfort of the workplace, optimizing all employees so that the results obtained can also be optimal, ensuring that production results achieved are always controlled, and motivating employees by giving bonuses to employees who perform well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飞机仿制品 中小企业从未了解过所达到的生产率水平,因为它们没有进行过生产率测量和分析。本研究旨在确定生产率水平、导致生产率下降的因素,并为纠正措施提供建议。使用的方法是 OMAX 和鱼骨图。使用了五个生产率比率。比率 1 和比率 4 以大量的不良生产率为主。生产率总成就最低出现在 7 月份,为 0,而生产率总成就最高出现在 2 月份,为 601.13。总生产率与最佳标准生产率的变化指数值出现在 2 月份,为 100.38%,而最差值出现在 7 月份,为-100%。前一时期生产率变化的最佳指数值出现在 8 月份,为 395.15%,而最差值出现在 7 月份,为-100%。纠正措施包括:优化休息时间,使他们在工作时能够更加集中精力;优化工作时间,使工作时间不被浪费;提高工作场所的舒适度;优化所有员工,使所取得的成果也能达到最佳状态;确保所取得的生产成果始终处于可控状态;通过向表现出色的员工发放奖金来激励员工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity Analysis Using the Objective Matrix and Fishbone Diagram Methods in SMEs of Airplane Replicas
Aircraft Replica SMEs have never known the level of productivity achieved because they have not carried out productivity measurements and analysis. This study aims to determine the level of productivity, the factors causing the decline in productivity, and provide suggestions for corrective actions. The methods used are OMAX and fishbone diagrams. There are five productivity ratios used. Ratios 1 and 4 are dominated by a very large number of bad productivity ratios. The lowest total productivity achievement occurred in July at 0, while the highest total productivity achievement occurred in February at 601.13. The index value of change in the achievement of total productivity to the best standard productivity occurred in February at 100.38%, while the worst value occurred in July at -100%. The best index value of changes to productivity in the previous period occurred in August at 395.15%, while the worst value occurred in July at - 100%. Corrective actions include optimizing rest hours so that at work they can concentrate even more, optimizing working hours so that no working hours are wasted, increasing the comfort of the workplace, optimizing all employees so that the results obtained can also be optimal, ensuring that production results achieved are always controlled, and motivating employees by giving bonuses to employees who perform well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信