多相流模式和滤网选择:油藏控制阀优化所必需的两个被忽视的参数

C. A. Malbrel, R. Kale, J. Agarwal, K. Gohari
{"title":"多相流模式和滤网选择:油藏控制阀优化所必需的两个被忽视的参数","authors":"C. A. Malbrel, R. Kale, J. Agarwal, K. Gohari","doi":"10.2118/217843-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The deployment of sophisticated Autonomous Inflow Control Valves (AICV) to manage reservoir uncertainty and water production in stand-alone completion is becoming increasingly popular, and the range of options available is constantly evolving. To date, much of the extensive testing performed with AICVs has assumed homogenous/dispersed flow (taking no direct account of production phase separation) and has ignored the potential role of varying screen geometries. Under a wide range of downhole conditions, stratified flow may be a more likely scenario and the full scale testing of AICV assembly under realistic downhole field conditions provides insights into the annular flow behavior and identifies critical interactions between the AICV and the screen, potentially leading to new means of enhancing AICV performance.\n A series of multiphase flow tests was performed on full size screen and housing assemblies to verify flow pattern under realistic conditions and assess the potential for screen geometry to have an impact on the AICV performance in stratified flow conditions.\n Various features of the screens, such as screen type (mesh screen, wire wrap), and screen/basepipe standoff height were investigated under various water fractions, flow rates and oil viscosities. The screen jacket was also partially blocked by a sleeve to simulate the partial burial of the screen in the wellbore. The multiphase flow patterns in the annular space around the screen and inside the valve housing were monitored through observation windows and high-speed camera, in conjunction with pressure drop across the screen and the entire assembly.\n Under normal flowrates, it is observed that the multiphase flow shows a stratified flow pattern around the screen, with the location of the water/oil interface highly sensitive to the oil viscosity. For high viscosity oil (100cp), the W/O interface is very low, resulting in a high water phase velocity high. This provides another reason why the onset of water production in heavy oil is often causing rapid screen plugging and high drawdown. Under these conditions, stratified flow is also prevalent in the valve housing, irrespective of the screen type.\n Under semi buried conditions, the screen type and standoff between the screen jacket and the basepipe played an outsize role in defining the flow pattern inside the housing. With a mesh screen and tall standoff, the flow pattern remains largely stratified while a wire wrap screen yields a bubbly/misty condition. As a result of these change in flow pattern, AICV performance is expected to be degraded when wire wrap screens are used in partially collapsed wellbore.","PeriodicalId":518880,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024","volume":"140 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphase Flow Pattern and Screen Selection: Two Overlooked Parameters Essential to Reservoir Control Valve Optimization\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Malbrel, R. Kale, J. Agarwal, K. Gohari\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/217843-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The deployment of sophisticated Autonomous Inflow Control Valves (AICV) to manage reservoir uncertainty and water production in stand-alone completion is becoming increasingly popular, and the range of options available is constantly evolving. To date, much of the extensive testing performed with AICVs has assumed homogenous/dispersed flow (taking no direct account of production phase separation) and has ignored the potential role of varying screen geometries. Under a wide range of downhole conditions, stratified flow may be a more likely scenario and the full scale testing of AICV assembly under realistic downhole field conditions provides insights into the annular flow behavior and identifies critical interactions between the AICV and the screen, potentially leading to new means of enhancing AICV performance.\\n A series of multiphase flow tests was performed on full size screen and housing assemblies to verify flow pattern under realistic conditions and assess the potential for screen geometry to have an impact on the AICV performance in stratified flow conditions.\\n Various features of the screens, such as screen type (mesh screen, wire wrap), and screen/basepipe standoff height were investigated under various water fractions, flow rates and oil viscosities. The screen jacket was also partially blocked by a sleeve to simulate the partial burial of the screen in the wellbore. The multiphase flow patterns in the annular space around the screen and inside the valve housing were monitored through observation windows and high-speed camera, in conjunction with pressure drop across the screen and the entire assembly.\\n Under normal flowrates, it is observed that the multiphase flow shows a stratified flow pattern around the screen, with the location of the water/oil interface highly sensitive to the oil viscosity. For high viscosity oil (100cp), the W/O interface is very low, resulting in a high water phase velocity high. This provides another reason why the onset of water production in heavy oil is often causing rapid screen plugging and high drawdown. Under these conditions, stratified flow is also prevalent in the valve housing, irrespective of the screen type.\\n Under semi buried conditions, the screen type and standoff between the screen jacket and the basepipe played an outsize role in defining the flow pattern inside the housing. With a mesh screen and tall standoff, the flow pattern remains largely stratified while a wire wrap screen yields a bubbly/misty condition. As a result of these change in flow pattern, AICV performance is expected to be degraded when wire wrap screens are used in partially collapsed wellbore.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/217843-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, February 22, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217843-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在独立完井中部署复杂的自主流入控制阀(AICV)来管理储层的不确定性和产水量正变得越来越流行,可供选择的范围也在不断扩大。迄今为止,对 AICV 进行的大量测试大多假定为同质/分散流动(没有直接考虑生产相分离),并忽略了不同滤网几何形状的潜在作用。在广泛的井下条件下,分层流可能是更可能发生的情况,在真实的井下现场条件下对AICV组件进行全面测试,可以深入了解环流行为,确定AICV与滤网之间的关键相互作用,从而有可能找到提高AICV性能的新方法。对全尺寸滤网和壳体组件进行了一系列多相流测试,以验证现实条件下的流动模式,并评估滤网几何形状在分层流动条件下对 AICV 性能产生影响的可能性。在不同的水分量、流速和油粘度条件下,对滤网的各种特征进行了研究,例如滤网类型(网状滤网、金属丝缠绕)以及滤网/基管间距高度。滤网护套也被套筒部分封堵,以模拟滤网部分埋入井筒的情况。通过观察窗和高速摄像机监测了滤网周围环形空间和阀壳内部的多相流动模式,以及滤网和整个组件的压降。在正常流速下,多相流在滤网周围呈现分层流动模式,水/油界面的位置对油的粘度高度敏感。对于高粘度油(100cp),水/油界面非常低,导致水相速度高。这就提供了另一个原因,说明为什么重油开始产水时往往会造成快速的滤网堵塞和高抽油率。在这些条件下,无论滤网类型如何,阀壳内也普遍存在分层流动。在半掩埋条件下,滤网类型以及滤网护套与基管之间的间距对确定阀体内的流动模式起着重要作用。使用网筛和高间距筛网时,流动模式在很大程度上保持分层,而使用金属丝缠绕筛网时,则会产生气泡/雾状状态。由于流动模式的这些变化,在部分坍塌的井筒中使用金属丝缠绕滤网时,AICV 的性能预计会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiphase Flow Pattern and Screen Selection: Two Overlooked Parameters Essential to Reservoir Control Valve Optimization
The deployment of sophisticated Autonomous Inflow Control Valves (AICV) to manage reservoir uncertainty and water production in stand-alone completion is becoming increasingly popular, and the range of options available is constantly evolving. To date, much of the extensive testing performed with AICVs has assumed homogenous/dispersed flow (taking no direct account of production phase separation) and has ignored the potential role of varying screen geometries. Under a wide range of downhole conditions, stratified flow may be a more likely scenario and the full scale testing of AICV assembly under realistic downhole field conditions provides insights into the annular flow behavior and identifies critical interactions between the AICV and the screen, potentially leading to new means of enhancing AICV performance. A series of multiphase flow tests was performed on full size screen and housing assemblies to verify flow pattern under realistic conditions and assess the potential for screen geometry to have an impact on the AICV performance in stratified flow conditions. Various features of the screens, such as screen type (mesh screen, wire wrap), and screen/basepipe standoff height were investigated under various water fractions, flow rates and oil viscosities. The screen jacket was also partially blocked by a sleeve to simulate the partial burial of the screen in the wellbore. The multiphase flow patterns in the annular space around the screen and inside the valve housing were monitored through observation windows and high-speed camera, in conjunction with pressure drop across the screen and the entire assembly. Under normal flowrates, it is observed that the multiphase flow shows a stratified flow pattern around the screen, with the location of the water/oil interface highly sensitive to the oil viscosity. For high viscosity oil (100cp), the W/O interface is very low, resulting in a high water phase velocity high. This provides another reason why the onset of water production in heavy oil is often causing rapid screen plugging and high drawdown. Under these conditions, stratified flow is also prevalent in the valve housing, irrespective of the screen type. Under semi buried conditions, the screen type and standoff between the screen jacket and the basepipe played an outsize role in defining the flow pattern inside the housing. With a mesh screen and tall standoff, the flow pattern remains largely stratified while a wire wrap screen yields a bubbly/misty condition. As a result of these change in flow pattern, AICV performance is expected to be degraded when wire wrap screens are used in partially collapsed wellbore.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信