与年龄匹配的正常人相比,评估糖尿病患者的径向毛细血管周围丛和视网膜神经纤维层厚度

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Christina S.I. Farag, Heba M.A. El-Saied, H. M. El-Mofty, R. El-Mofty
{"title":"与年龄匹配的正常人相比,评估糖尿病患者的径向毛细血管周围丛和视网膜神经纤维层厚度","authors":"Christina S.I. Farag, Heba M.A. El-Saied, H. M. El-Mofty, R. El-Mofty","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_72_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes, leading to vision impairment and blindness worldwide. As early detection is crucial, our study investigated the potential of radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness as biomarkers for retinal assessment in diabetic patients.\n \n \n \n We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 48 participants, categorized into three groups: healthy controls, diabetic patients without DR (No DR), and patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Vascular density (VD) and RNFL thickness were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT-Angiography (OCT-A).\n \n \n \n The study showed a significant difference in VD among the three groups. The mean whole image VD% in the control group was 51.28%, while the No DR and NPDR groups had mean percentages of 49.27% and 49.46%, respectively (P=0.015). These differences were also significant for peripapillary VD (P=0.003), superior-hemi VD (P=0.035), and inferior-hemi VD percentage (P=0.002). Conversely, there were no significant differences in RNFL thickness among the groups (P=0.138). In the NPDR group, positive correlations were found between RNFL thickness and VD percentages, including superior-hemi RNFL thickness and superior-hemi VD% (r=0.724, P<0.001), average whole RNFL thickness and whole image VD% (r=0.655, P<0.001), and average whole RNFL thickness and peripapillary VD% (r=0.647, P<0.001).\n \n \n \n This research emphasizes the value of assessment of retinal VD thickness of the radial peripapillary plexus as an early indicator for preclinical diabetic retinal changes in diabetic patients.\n","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the radial peripapillary capillary plexus and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diabetic patients in comparison to normal age-matched individuals\",\"authors\":\"Christina S.I. Farag, Heba M.A. El-Saied, H. M. El-Mofty, R. El-Mofty\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_72_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes, leading to vision impairment and blindness worldwide. As early detection is crucial, our study investigated the potential of radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness as biomarkers for retinal assessment in diabetic patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 48 participants, categorized into three groups: healthy controls, diabetic patients without DR (No DR), and patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Vascular density (VD) and RNFL thickness were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT-Angiography (OCT-A).\\n \\n \\n \\n The study showed a significant difference in VD among the three groups. The mean whole image VD% in the control group was 51.28%, while the No DR and NPDR groups had mean percentages of 49.27% and 49.46%, respectively (P=0.015). These differences were also significant for peripapillary VD (P=0.003), superior-hemi VD (P=0.035), and inferior-hemi VD percentage (P=0.002). Conversely, there were no significant differences in RNFL thickness among the groups (P=0.138). In the NPDR group, positive correlations were found between RNFL thickness and VD percentages, including superior-hemi RNFL thickness and superior-hemi VD% (r=0.724, P<0.001), average whole RNFL thickness and whole image VD% (r=0.655, P<0.001), and average whole RNFL thickness and peripapillary VD% (r=0.647, P<0.001).\\n \\n \\n \\n This research emphasizes the value of assessment of retinal VD thickness of the radial peripapillary plexus as an early indicator for preclinical diabetic retinal changes in diabetic patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_72_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_72_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的主要并发症,在全球范围内导致视力损害和失明。由于早期检测至关重要,我们的研究调查了径向毛细血管周围丛(RPCP)和视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度作为生物标记物评估糖尿病患者视网膜的潜力。 我们进行了一项横断面研究,将 48 名参与者分为三组:健康对照组、无 DR 的糖尿病患者(No DR)和轻中度非增殖性 DR 患者(NPDR)。研究人员使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和光学相干断层扫描-血管造影术(OCT-A)对血管密度(VD)和 RNFL 厚度进行了评估。 研究显示,三组患者的血管密度存在明显差异。对照组整个图像的平均 VD% 为 51.28%,而无 DR 组和 NPDR 组的平均百分比分别为 49.27% 和 49.46%(P=0.015)。这些差异在毛细血管周围 VD(P=0.003)、上半部 VD(P=0.035)和下半部 VD 百分比(P=0.002)方面也有显著性差异。相反,各组的 RNFL 厚度无明显差异(P=0.138)。在 NPDR 组中,RNFL 厚度与 VD 百分比呈正相关,包括上半部 RNFL 厚度与上半部 VD 百分比(r=0.724,P<0.001)、平均整个 RNFL 厚度与整个图像 VD 百分比(r=0.655,P<0.001)、平均整个 RNFL 厚度与瞳孔周围 VD 百分比(r=0.647,P<0.001)。 这项研究强调了评估糖尿病患者视网膜径向毛细血管周围丛 VD 厚度作为临床前糖尿病视网膜病变早期指标的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the radial peripapillary capillary plexus and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diabetic patients in comparison to normal age-matched individuals
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes, leading to vision impairment and blindness worldwide. As early detection is crucial, our study investigated the potential of radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness as biomarkers for retinal assessment in diabetic patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 48 participants, categorized into three groups: healthy controls, diabetic patients without DR (No DR), and patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Vascular density (VD) and RNFL thickness were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and OCT-Angiography (OCT-A). The study showed a significant difference in VD among the three groups. The mean whole image VD% in the control group was 51.28%, while the No DR and NPDR groups had mean percentages of 49.27% and 49.46%, respectively (P=0.015). These differences were also significant for peripapillary VD (P=0.003), superior-hemi VD (P=0.035), and inferior-hemi VD percentage (P=0.002). Conversely, there were no significant differences in RNFL thickness among the groups (P=0.138). In the NPDR group, positive correlations were found between RNFL thickness and VD percentages, including superior-hemi RNFL thickness and superior-hemi VD% (r=0.724, P<0.001), average whole RNFL thickness and whole image VD% (r=0.655, P<0.001), and average whole RNFL thickness and peripapillary VD% (r=0.647, P<0.001). This research emphasizes the value of assessment of retinal VD thickness of the radial peripapillary plexus as an early indicator for preclinical diabetic retinal changes in diabetic patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信