通过罗布森分类系统分析剖腹产:审计日益增长的剖腹产率的新概念

Dr. Rachna Chaudhary, Dr. Nancy Yadav, Dr. Shakun Singh, Dr. Vandana Dhama, Dr. Komal Rastogi
{"title":"通过罗布森分类系统分析剖腹产:审计日益增长的剖腹产率的新概念","authors":"Dr. Rachna Chaudhary, Dr. Nancy Yadav, Dr. Shakun Singh, Dr. Vandana Dhama, Dr. Komal Rastogi","doi":"10.33545/26648393.2024.v6.i1a.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical interventions worldwide. In the past few decades, the rate of CS surgeries has increased across the whole world. For patients whose spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is contraindicated or not possible, CS is carried out to protect the lives of both foetus and the mother. However, in reality, CS is also being performed without following standard indications or based on vague indications like obstructed labour with intact membranes. Although CSs are known to be life-saving procedures, various risks have been found attached to CS concerning present or future pregnancies. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of this study are the following: Classifying women undergoing CS as per the Robson criteria, analysing the CS rate using the Robson criteria, determining the groups which contribute the most to CS, identifying commonalities among these groups, and studying the foeto-maternal outcomes in CS patients. Methods: Prospective observational studies of all CSs conducted at Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial LLRM Medical College, Meerut were classified using RTGCS. The duration of the study period was one year, and all of the patients who delivered via CS at LLRM Medical College during the said period were included in the study. Results: Out of the total 3,343 deliveries, 2,059 deliveries were by CS. The analysis by applying Robson’s classification revealed that approximately 37.9% of the patients belonged to Robson group 5, followed by 25.2% that belonged to Robson group 10 and then Robson groups 1, 2 and 3 followed. Of the various indications of CS, previous LSCS with scar tenderness was the most common indication (30.8%). Conclusion: Robson classification helps analyse the trend of increasing CS rate and provides an outlook on how to reduce this increasing trend. Good labour monitoring, proper ANC care regarding methods of delivery and encouraging TOLAC and DOULA (birth companion) can help to reduce CS rate.","PeriodicalId":475151,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynaecology Sciences","volume":"78 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of caesarean section through Robson classification system: An emerging concept to audit the increasing caesarean section rate\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Rachna Chaudhary, Dr. Nancy Yadav, Dr. Shakun Singh, Dr. Vandana Dhama, Dr. Komal Rastogi\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/26648393.2024.v6.i1a.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical interventions worldwide. In the past few decades, the rate of CS surgeries has increased across the whole world. For patients whose spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is contraindicated or not possible, CS is carried out to protect the lives of both foetus and the mother. However, in reality, CS is also being performed without following standard indications or based on vague indications like obstructed labour with intact membranes. Although CSs are known to be life-saving procedures, various risks have been found attached to CS concerning present or future pregnancies. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of this study are the following: Classifying women undergoing CS as per the Robson criteria, analysing the CS rate using the Robson criteria, determining the groups which contribute the most to CS, identifying commonalities among these groups, and studying the foeto-maternal outcomes in CS patients. Methods: Prospective observational studies of all CSs conducted at Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial LLRM Medical College, Meerut were classified using RTGCS. The duration of the study period was one year, and all of the patients who delivered via CS at LLRM Medical College during the said period were included in the study. Results: Out of the total 3,343 deliveries, 2,059 deliveries were by CS. The analysis by applying Robson’s classification revealed that approximately 37.9% of the patients belonged to Robson group 5, followed by 25.2% that belonged to Robson group 10 and then Robson groups 1, 2 and 3 followed. Of the various indications of CS, previous LSCS with scar tenderness was the most common indication (30.8%). Conclusion: Robson classification helps analyse the trend of increasing CS rate and provides an outlook on how to reduce this increasing trend. Good labour monitoring, proper ANC care regarding methods of delivery and encouraging TOLAC and DOULA (birth companion) can help to reduce CS rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":475151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynaecology Sciences\",\"volume\":\"78 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynaecology Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/26648393.2024.v6.i1a.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynaecology Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26648393.2024.v6.i1a.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖腹产(CS)是全球最常见的外科手术之一。在过去的几十年里,全世界的剖腹产手术率都在上升。对于有自然阴道分娩(SVD)禁忌症或无法进行自然阴道分娩的患者,实施剖腹产手术是为了保护胎儿和母亲的生命。然而,在现实生活中,也有不遵循标准指征或基于模糊指征(如胎膜未破的难产)而实施 CS 的情况。众所周知,CS 是挽救生命的手术,但也发现 CS 对现在或将来的妊娠存在各种风险。目的和目标:本研究的目的和目标如下:根据罗布森标准对接受 CS 的妇女进行分类,使用罗布森标准分析 CS 的发生率,确定导致 CS 发生率最高的群体,找出这些群体的共同点,并研究 CS 患者的胎儿-产妇结局。研究方法使用 RTGCS 对 Meerut 的 Lala Lajpat Rai 纪念 LLRM 医学院进行的所有 CS 的前瞻性观察研究进行分类。研究时间为一年,在此期间在 LLRM 医学院通过 CS 分娩的所有患者均被纳入研究范围。研究结果在总共 3,343 例分娩中,有 2,059 例是通过 CS 分娩的。根据罗布森分类法进行的分析显示,约 37.9% 的患者属于罗布森第 5 组,25.2% 属于罗布森第 10 组,然后是罗布森第 1、2 和 3 组。在 CS 的各种适应症中,既往 LSCS 并伴有瘢痕触痛是最常见的适应症(30.8%)。结论:罗布森分类有助于分析CS率上升的趋势,并为如何减少这一上升趋势提供了展望。良好的产程监测、关于分娩方式的适当产前护理以及鼓励 TOLAC 和 DOULA(陪产)有助于降低 CS 率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of caesarean section through Robson classification system: An emerging concept to audit the increasing caesarean section rate
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical interventions worldwide. In the past few decades, the rate of CS surgeries has increased across the whole world. For patients whose spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is contraindicated or not possible, CS is carried out to protect the lives of both foetus and the mother. However, in reality, CS is also being performed without following standard indications or based on vague indications like obstructed labour with intact membranes. Although CSs are known to be life-saving procedures, various risks have been found attached to CS concerning present or future pregnancies. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of this study are the following: Classifying women undergoing CS as per the Robson criteria, analysing the CS rate using the Robson criteria, determining the groups which contribute the most to CS, identifying commonalities among these groups, and studying the foeto-maternal outcomes in CS patients. Methods: Prospective observational studies of all CSs conducted at Lala Lajpat Rai Memorial LLRM Medical College, Meerut were classified using RTGCS. The duration of the study period was one year, and all of the patients who delivered via CS at LLRM Medical College during the said period were included in the study. Results: Out of the total 3,343 deliveries, 2,059 deliveries were by CS. The analysis by applying Robson’s classification revealed that approximately 37.9% of the patients belonged to Robson group 5, followed by 25.2% that belonged to Robson group 10 and then Robson groups 1, 2 and 3 followed. Of the various indications of CS, previous LSCS with scar tenderness was the most common indication (30.8%). Conclusion: Robson classification helps analyse the trend of increasing CS rate and provides an outlook on how to reduce this increasing trend. Good labour monitoring, proper ANC care regarding methods of delivery and encouraging TOLAC and DOULA (birth companion) can help to reduce CS rate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信