评估 6 分钟步行测试对预测印度患者间质性肺病严重程度的价值

Anantha Krishna Sompalli, Sateesh Rao Kailasa, Varun Pulugundla, Naveen Chandra Reddy Kotha, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Gopala Krishnaiah Velisela, Mohammed Soheb Sadath Ansari
{"title":"评估 6 分钟步行测试对预测印度患者间质性肺病严重程度的价值","authors":"Anantha Krishna Sompalli, Sateesh Rao Kailasa, Varun Pulugundla, Naveen Chandra Reddy Kotha, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Gopala Krishnaiah Velisela, Mohammed Soheb Sadath Ansari","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasing. High-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), despite having limitations, remains the choice of method for diagnosis and assessment of severity of ILD. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6-min walk test to assess the severity of the ILD compared to HRCT. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 40 patients with ILD in a tertiary hospital in Hyderabad. The data included age, gender, smoking, HRCT, 6-min walk test, spirometry, diffusion lung capacity and medical history. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and ROC curve were used to determine the outcomes. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.18 + 13.01 years. 62.5% never smoked. Overall, 50% had severe ILD, and the rest had mild to moderate. The distance walked per 6-min, SpO2 before and SpO2 after, was significantly lower (p = 0.001; 0.002; <0.001, respectively) among patients with severe ILD than mild or moderate. The sensitivity and 1-specificity of the distance walked in 6-min to detect the severity of ILD was 0.90 and 0.31, respectively; sensitivity and 1-specificity of SpO2 before the test was 0.81 and 0.34, while that of SpO2 after the test was 0.90 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the 6-min walk test is highly sensitive and specific for predicting the severity of ILD among patients. All three components of the 6-min walk test: distance, oxygen saturation before, and oxygen saturation after the test significantly lowered and were independent predictors of severe ILD.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the value of 6-min walk test to predict the severity of interstitial lung disease among Indian patients\",\"authors\":\"Anantha Krishna Sompalli, Sateesh Rao Kailasa, Varun Pulugundla, Naveen Chandra Reddy Kotha, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Gopala Krishnaiah Velisela, Mohammed Soheb Sadath Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Introduction: The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasing. High-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), despite having limitations, remains the choice of method for diagnosis and assessment of severity of ILD. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6-min walk test to assess the severity of the ILD compared to HRCT. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 40 patients with ILD in a tertiary hospital in Hyderabad. The data included age, gender, smoking, HRCT, 6-min walk test, spirometry, diffusion lung capacity and medical history. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and ROC curve were used to determine the outcomes. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.18 + 13.01 years. 62.5% never smoked. Overall, 50% had severe ILD, and the rest had mild to moderate. The distance walked per 6-min, SpO2 before and SpO2 after, was significantly lower (p = 0.001; 0.002; <0.001, respectively) among patients with severe ILD than mild or moderate. The sensitivity and 1-specificity of the distance walked in 6-min to detect the severity of ILD was 0.90 and 0.31, respectively; sensitivity and 1-specificity of SpO2 before the test was 0.81 and 0.34, while that of SpO2 after the test was 0.90 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the 6-min walk test is highly sensitive and specific for predicting the severity of ILD among patients. All three components of the 6-min walk test: distance, oxygen saturation before, and oxygen saturation after the test significantly lowered and were independent predictors of severe ILD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_54_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介间质性肺病(ILD)的发病率正在上升。高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)虽然有其局限性,但仍是诊断和评估间质性肺病严重程度的首选方法。研究目的确定 6 分钟步行测试与 HRCT 相比在评估 ILD 严重程度方面的有效性。方法:横断面研究在海得拉巴的一家三级医院对 40 名 ILD 患者进行了横断面研究。数据包括年龄、性别、吸烟、HRCT、6 分钟步行测试、肺活量测定、肺弥散容量和病史。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 ROC 曲线确定结果。结果显示参与者的平均年龄为 57.18 + 13.01 岁。62.5%的人从不吸烟。总体而言,50%的人患有重度 ILD,其余为轻度至中度。重度 ILD 患者每 6 分钟的步行距离、步行前的 SpO2 和步行后的 SpO2 均显著低于轻度或中度患者(分别为 p = 0.001;0.002;<0.001)。6 分钟步行距离检测 ILD 严重程度的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.90 和 0.31;检测前 SpO2 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.81 和 0.34,而检测后 SpO2 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.90 和 0.17。结论本研究发现,6 分钟步行测试对预测 ILD 患者的严重程度具有高度敏感性和特异性。6 分钟步行测试的三个组成部分:距离、测试前的血氧饱和度和测试后的血氧饱和度均显著降低,是严重 ILD 的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the value of 6-min walk test to predict the severity of interstitial lung disease among Indian patients
Introduction: The prevalence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is increasing. High-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT), despite having limitations, remains the choice of method for diagnosis and assessment of severity of ILD. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 6-min walk test to assess the severity of the ILD compared to HRCT. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done among 40 patients with ILD in a tertiary hospital in Hyderabad. The data included age, gender, smoking, HRCT, 6-min walk test, spirometry, diffusion lung capacity and medical history. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and ROC curve were used to determine the outcomes. Results: The mean age of participants was 57.18 + 13.01 years. 62.5% never smoked. Overall, 50% had severe ILD, and the rest had mild to moderate. The distance walked per 6-min, SpO2 before and SpO2 after, was significantly lower (p = 0.001; 0.002; <0.001, respectively) among patients with severe ILD than mild or moderate. The sensitivity and 1-specificity of the distance walked in 6-min to detect the severity of ILD was 0.90 and 0.31, respectively; sensitivity and 1-specificity of SpO2 before the test was 0.81 and 0.34, while that of SpO2 after the test was 0.90 and 0.17, respectively. Conclusion: This study found that the 6-min walk test is highly sensitive and specific for predicting the severity of ILD among patients. All three components of the 6-min walk test: distance, oxygen saturation before, and oxygen saturation after the test significantly lowered and were independent predictors of severe ILD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信