人工智能在写作教学中的应用:自我决定理论视角

Q1 Arts and Humanities
XLinguae Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.16
Rahayu, S. Weda, Muliati, Nofvia De Vega
{"title":"人工智能在写作教学中的应用:自我决定理论视角","authors":"Rahayu, S. Weda, Muliati, Nofvia De Vega","doi":"10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to delve into the multifaceted role of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing instruction, with a particular emphasis on AI-based writing tools like Grammarly and QuillBot. Contributing to the ongoing discourse on incorporating AI into educational practices, this research offers a thorough grasp of the benefits and possible drawbacks of using AI in writing instruction. The study adopted a qualitative case study design to collect data from a diverse range of participants, including novice and experienced users of AI-based writing tools. Through a combination of in-depth interviews and direct observations, the study collected rich, qualitative data, providing a holistic view of the experiences and perceptions of individuals regarding the use of AI in writing instruction. The main findings of the study revealed that AI-based writing tools enhance writing competence and fulfil psychological needs such as autonomy, relatedness, and integrity in writing but risks of relying too much on AI were also pointed out. For example, AI could kill creativity, make writing styles more similar, and make people feel like they have no control over their writing. While the study acknowledges the significant potential of AI to enhance the writing process. Moreover, it highlights the importance of being aware of the potential dangers that it poses. The results emphasize the need for a well-rounded strategy that capitalizes on the advantages of AI in writing education while guaranteeing that it enhances and complements unique writing approaches, as opposed to dictating them.","PeriodicalId":53512,"journal":{"name":"XLinguae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in writing instruction: A self-determination theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Rahayu, S. Weda, Muliati, Nofvia De Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to delve into the multifaceted role of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing instruction, with a particular emphasis on AI-based writing tools like Grammarly and QuillBot. Contributing to the ongoing discourse on incorporating AI into educational practices, this research offers a thorough grasp of the benefits and possible drawbacks of using AI in writing instruction. The study adopted a qualitative case study design to collect data from a diverse range of participants, including novice and experienced users of AI-based writing tools. Through a combination of in-depth interviews and direct observations, the study collected rich, qualitative data, providing a holistic view of the experiences and perceptions of individuals regarding the use of AI in writing instruction. The main findings of the study revealed that AI-based writing tools enhance writing competence and fulfil psychological needs such as autonomy, relatedness, and integrity in writing but risks of relying too much on AI were also pointed out. For example, AI could kill creativity, make writing styles more similar, and make people feel like they have no control over their writing. While the study acknowledges the significant potential of AI to enhance the writing process. Moreover, it highlights the importance of being aware of the potential dangers that it poses. The results emphasize the need for a well-rounded strategy that capitalizes on the advantages of AI in writing education while guaranteeing that it enhances and complements unique writing approaches, as opposed to dictating them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"XLinguae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"XLinguae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XLinguae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2024.17.01.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在深入探讨人工智能(AI)在写作教学中的多方面作用,尤其侧重于基于 AI 的写作工具,如 Grammarly 和 QuillBot。本研究为当前关于将人工智能纳入教育实践的讨论做出了贡献,它对在写作教学中使用人工智能的益处和可能存在的弊端进行了全面的把握。本研究采用定性案例研究设计,从不同的参与者那里收集数据,其中包括基于人工智能的写作工具的新手和资深用户。通过深度访谈和直接观察相结合的方式,研究收集到了丰富的定性数据,提供了个人在写作教学中使用人工智能的经验和看法的整体视角。研究的主要结果表明,基于人工智能的写作工具可以提高写作能力,满足写作中的自主性、关联性和完整性等心理需求,但也指出了过度依赖人工智能的风险。例如,人工智能可能会扼杀创造力,使写作风格更加相似,让人感觉无法控制自己的写作。虽然这项研究承认人工智能在改进写作过程方面具有巨大潜力。此外,它还强调了意识到其潜在危险的重要性。研究结果强调,在写作教学中需要采取全面的策略,充分利用人工智能的优势,同时保证人工智能能够增强和补充独特的写作方法,而不是支配这些方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence in writing instruction: A self-determination theory perspective
This study aimed to delve into the multifaceted role of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing instruction, with a particular emphasis on AI-based writing tools like Grammarly and QuillBot. Contributing to the ongoing discourse on incorporating AI into educational practices, this research offers a thorough grasp of the benefits and possible drawbacks of using AI in writing instruction. The study adopted a qualitative case study design to collect data from a diverse range of participants, including novice and experienced users of AI-based writing tools. Through a combination of in-depth interviews and direct observations, the study collected rich, qualitative data, providing a holistic view of the experiences and perceptions of individuals regarding the use of AI in writing instruction. The main findings of the study revealed that AI-based writing tools enhance writing competence and fulfil psychological needs such as autonomy, relatedness, and integrity in writing but risks of relying too much on AI were also pointed out. For example, AI could kill creativity, make writing styles more similar, and make people feel like they have no control over their writing. While the study acknowledges the significant potential of AI to enhance the writing process. Moreover, it highlights the importance of being aware of the potential dangers that it poses. The results emphasize the need for a well-rounded strategy that capitalizes on the advantages of AI in writing education while guaranteeing that it enhances and complements unique writing approaches, as opposed to dictating them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
XLinguae
XLinguae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The XLinguae (ISSN 2453-711X online, ISSN 1337-8384 print) is the European scientific language double-blind peer-reviewed journal covering philosophy, linguistics, applied linguistics fields on Modern European languages. It is published by the Slovenská Vzdelávacia a Obstarávacia s.r.o., Nitra, with frequency of 4 issues per year: January + Special Issue, April, June, and October. The main objective of the Journal is to promote and sustain the language and culture diversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信