{"title":"后向线性子空间收缩","authors":"Daniel K. Sewell","doi":"10.1214/24-ba1414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common to hold prior beliefs that are not characterized by points in the parameter space but instead are relational in nature and can be described by a linear subspace. While some previous work has been done to account for such prior beliefs, the focus has primarily been on point estimators within a regression framework. We argue, however, that prior beliefs about parameters ought to be encoded into the prior distribution rather than in the formation of a point estimator. In this way, the prior beliefs help shape \\textit{all} inference. Through exponential tilting, we propose a fully generalizable method of taking existing prior information from, e.g., a pilot study, and combining it with additional prior beliefs represented by parameters lying on a linear subspace. We provide computationally efficient algorithms for posterior inference that, once inference is made using a non-tilted prior, does not depend on the sample size. We illustrate our proposed approach on an antihypertensive clinical trial dataset where we shrink towards a power law dose-response relationship, and on monthly influenza and pneumonia data where we shrink moving average lag parameters towards smoothness. Software to implement the proposed approach is provided in the R package \\verb+SUBSET+ available on GitHub.","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior Shrinkage Towards Linear Subspaces\",\"authors\":\"Daniel K. Sewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/24-ba1414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is common to hold prior beliefs that are not characterized by points in the parameter space but instead are relational in nature and can be described by a linear subspace. While some previous work has been done to account for such prior beliefs, the focus has primarily been on point estimators within a regression framework. We argue, however, that prior beliefs about parameters ought to be encoded into the prior distribution rather than in the formation of a point estimator. In this way, the prior beliefs help shape \\\\textit{all} inference. Through exponential tilting, we propose a fully generalizable method of taking existing prior information from, e.g., a pilot study, and combining it with additional prior beliefs represented by parameters lying on a linear subspace. We provide computationally efficient algorithms for posterior inference that, once inference is made using a non-tilted prior, does not depend on the sample size. We illustrate our proposed approach on an antihypertensive clinical trial dataset where we shrink towards a power law dose-response relationship, and on monthly influenza and pneumonia data where we shrink moving average lag parameters towards smoothness. Software to implement the proposed approach is provided in the R package \\\\verb+SUBSET+ available on GitHub.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/24-ba1414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/24-ba1414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通常情况下,先验信念并不是以参数空间中的点为特征,而是具有相关性,可以用线性子空间来描述。虽然之前已经有一些工作考虑到了这种先验信念,但重点主要放在回归框架内的点估计器上。然而,我们认为,关于参数的先验信念应该被编码到先验分布中,而不是在形成点估计器时。这样,先验信念就能帮助形成(textit{all}推断。通过指数倾斜,我们提出了一种完全可推广的方法,即从试验研究等中获取现有先验信息,并将其与位于线性子空间上的参数所代表的额外先验信念相结合。我们为后验推断提供了计算高效的算法,一旦使用非倾斜先验进行推断,后验推断就不依赖于样本大小。我们在抗高血压临床试验数据集和月度流感和肺炎数据中说明了我们提出的方法,在前者中,我们对剂量-反应关系进行了幂律收缩;在后者中,我们对移动平均滞后参数进行了平滑收缩。GitHub 上的\verb+SUBSET+ R 软件包提供了实现该方法的软件。
It is common to hold prior beliefs that are not characterized by points in the parameter space but instead are relational in nature and can be described by a linear subspace. While some previous work has been done to account for such prior beliefs, the focus has primarily been on point estimators within a regression framework. We argue, however, that prior beliefs about parameters ought to be encoded into the prior distribution rather than in the formation of a point estimator. In this way, the prior beliefs help shape \textit{all} inference. Through exponential tilting, we propose a fully generalizable method of taking existing prior information from, e.g., a pilot study, and combining it with additional prior beliefs represented by parameters lying on a linear subspace. We provide computationally efficient algorithms for posterior inference that, once inference is made using a non-tilted prior, does not depend on the sample size. We illustrate our proposed approach on an antihypertensive clinical trial dataset where we shrink towards a power law dose-response relationship, and on monthly influenza and pneumonia data where we shrink moving average lag parameters towards smoothness. Software to implement the proposed approach is provided in the R package \verb+SUBSET+ available on GitHub.
期刊介绍:
Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining.
Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.