前部组件分离技术对降低急诊开腹手术后腹壁开裂和切口疝发生率的影响:一项可行性研究

Mahmoud Aziz, Ahmed Elghrieb, Mohamed E. Abdu, Mohamed M. Mahmoud
{"title":"前部组件分离技术对降低急诊开腹手术后腹壁开裂和切口疝发生率的影响:一项可行性研究","authors":"Mahmoud Aziz, Ahmed Elghrieb, Mohamed E. Abdu, Mohamed M. Mahmoud","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_238_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Abdominal wall dehiscence is one of the critical postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Emergency surgery highly contributes to the incidence of a burst abdomen due to a lack of proper preoperative preparation and the presence of intraabdominal sepsis. Anterior component separation was primarily evolved in abdominal wall reconstruction in the open abdomen and huge ventral hernia repair.\n \n \n \n This prospective study included 50 patients operated by midline laparotomy for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Anterior component separation technique was randomly applied in 25 patients before laparotomy closure, the other 25 patients were closed using the traditional midline closure method. Preoperative patient’s demographics, operative time, and different postoperative complications were reported. Incidence of burst abdomen in both groups was reported.\n \n \n \n Preoperative patient’s demographic data showed no significant difference between both groups; the mean age of the patients was 53.69±7.34. Operative time was significantly longer in the Anterior Components Separation (ACS) group (P<0.001). The incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence after ACS technique (4.3%) was significantly less than after traditional technique (24%). Postoperative seroma and hematoma were the common postoperative complications after ACS however the incidence was not statistically significant. Incisional hernia was detected in (13.04%) in ACS group and in (32%) in traditional group.\n \n \n \n Application of ACS technique during laparotomy closure in abdominal emergencies seems to lower the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence with no increase in different postoperative complications.\n","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anterior component separation technique on lowering the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence and incisional hernia after emergent laparotomy: a feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Aziz, Ahmed Elghrieb, Mohamed E. Abdu, Mohamed M. Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejs.ejs_238_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Abdominal wall dehiscence is one of the critical postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Emergency surgery highly contributes to the incidence of a burst abdomen due to a lack of proper preoperative preparation and the presence of intraabdominal sepsis. Anterior component separation was primarily evolved in abdominal wall reconstruction in the open abdomen and huge ventral hernia repair.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective study included 50 patients operated by midline laparotomy for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Anterior component separation technique was randomly applied in 25 patients before laparotomy closure, the other 25 patients were closed using the traditional midline closure method. Preoperative patient’s demographics, operative time, and different postoperative complications were reported. Incidence of burst abdomen in both groups was reported.\\n \\n \\n \\n Preoperative patient’s demographic data showed no significant difference between both groups; the mean age of the patients was 53.69±7.34. Operative time was significantly longer in the Anterior Components Separation (ACS) group (P<0.001). The incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence after ACS technique (4.3%) was significantly less than after traditional technique (24%). Postoperative seroma and hematoma were the common postoperative complications after ACS however the incidence was not statistically significant. Incisional hernia was detected in (13.04%) in ACS group and in (32%) in traditional group.\\n \\n \\n \\n Application of ACS technique during laparotomy closure in abdominal emergencies seems to lower the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence with no increase in different postoperative complications.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_238_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_238_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹壁开裂是腹部手术后的重要并发症之一。由于缺乏适当的术前准备和腹腔内脓毒症的存在,急诊手术极易导致腹壁裂开。前部组件分离术主要是在开腹腹壁重建和巨大腹股沟疝修补术中发展起来的。 这项前瞻性研究纳入了 50 名接受中线开腹手术的非创伤性急腹症患者。25 名患者在开腹缝合前随机采用了前部组件分离技术,另外 25 名患者则采用传统的中线缝合方法。报告了术前患者的人口统计学特征、手术时间和不同的术后并发症。报告了两组患者腹部破裂的发生率。 两组患者术前的人口统计学数据无明显差异;患者的平均年龄为(53.69±7.34)岁。前部组件分离术(ACS)组的手术时间明显更长(P<0.001)。采用 ACS 技术后腹壁开裂的发生率(4.3%)明显低于传统技术(24%)。术后血清肿和血肿是 ACS 常见的术后并发症,但发生率没有统计学意义。在 ACS 组(13.04%)和传统组(32%)中都发现了切口疝。 在腹部急症的开腹手术缝合过程中应用 ACS 技术似乎降低了腹壁开裂的发生率,而术后各种并发症却没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of anterior component separation technique on lowering the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence and incisional hernia after emergent laparotomy: a feasibility study
Abdominal wall dehiscence is one of the critical postoperative complications following abdominal surgeries. Emergency surgery highly contributes to the incidence of a burst abdomen due to a lack of proper preoperative preparation and the presence of intraabdominal sepsis. Anterior component separation was primarily evolved in abdominal wall reconstruction in the open abdomen and huge ventral hernia repair. This prospective study included 50 patients operated by midline laparotomy for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. Anterior component separation technique was randomly applied in 25 patients before laparotomy closure, the other 25 patients were closed using the traditional midline closure method. Preoperative patient’s demographics, operative time, and different postoperative complications were reported. Incidence of burst abdomen in both groups was reported. Preoperative patient’s demographic data showed no significant difference between both groups; the mean age of the patients was 53.69±7.34. Operative time was significantly longer in the Anterior Components Separation (ACS) group (P<0.001). The incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence after ACS technique (4.3%) was significantly less than after traditional technique (24%). Postoperative seroma and hematoma were the common postoperative complications after ACS however the incidence was not statistically significant. Incisional hernia was detected in (13.04%) in ACS group and in (32%) in traditional group. Application of ACS technique during laparotomy closure in abdominal emergencies seems to lower the incidence of abdominal wall dehiscence with no increase in different postoperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信