因丈夫喜欢同性而取消婚姻的法官考虑因素的法理分析(第 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK 号判决研究)

Hasyarania Hasyarania, Endang Heriyani
{"title":"因丈夫喜欢同性而取消婚姻的法官考虑因素的法理分析(第 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK 号判决研究)","authors":"Hasyarania Hasyarania, Endang Heriyani","doi":"10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ideal marriage is a marriage between a man and a woman who by nature have an attraction to the opposite sex. In the life of the community there are some men who have sexual orientation with fellow men, not to women as the opposite sex. The purpose of this study is to determine the judge's legal basis in annulling a marriage with a husband who is a same-sex lover (homosexual) in decision number 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK. The type of research used is normative legal research, with research data in the form of secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, interviews were also conducted with judges who decided this case at the Yogyakarta Religious Court to complement secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the legal basis for the judge's consideration in annulling the marriage between a woman and her same-sex lover husband in case number: 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk, is the provisions of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI along with the explanation of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI concerning fraud as a reason for annulling marriage. The sexual disorder in the form of homosexuality submitted by the applicant as a reason for annulment can be accepted as fraud committed by the husband to the wife, because the husband deliberately concealed his sexual disorder.","PeriodicalId":364743,"journal":{"name":"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Juridical Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Cancellation of Marriage Because Husband Likes the Same Sex (Study of Decision Number 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK)\",\"authors\":\"Hasyarania Hasyarania, Endang Heriyani\",\"doi\":\"10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ideal marriage is a marriage between a man and a woman who by nature have an attraction to the opposite sex. In the life of the community there are some men who have sexual orientation with fellow men, not to women as the opposite sex. The purpose of this study is to determine the judge's legal basis in annulling a marriage with a husband who is a same-sex lover (homosexual) in decision number 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK. The type of research used is normative legal research, with research data in the form of secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, interviews were also conducted with judges who decided this case at the Yogyakarta Religious Court to complement secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the legal basis for the judge's consideration in annulling the marriage between a woman and her same-sex lover husband in case number: 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk, is the provisions of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI along with the explanation of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI concerning fraud as a reason for annulling marriage. The sexual disorder in the form of homosexuality submitted by the applicant as a reason for annulment can be accepted as fraud committed by the husband to the wife, because the husband deliberately concealed his sexual disorder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v8i1.6204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理想的婚姻是天生对异性有吸引力的男女之间的婚姻。在社会生活中,有些男性的性取向是与男性同胞在一起,而不是与作为异性的女性在一起。本研究的目的是确定法官在第 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK 号判决中宣布与同性爱人(同性恋)丈夫的婚姻无效的法律依据。采用的研究类型是规范性法律研究,研究数据以二手数据的形式提供,包括第一手和第二手法律材料。此外,还对日惹宗教法院判决此案的法官进行了访谈,以补充二手数据。根据分析结果得出的结论是,在案件编号:176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk 中,法官考虑宣告一名妇女与其同性爱人丈夫之间的婚姻无效的法律依据是《基 督教伊斯兰教法》第 72 条第(2)款的规定,以及《基 督教伊斯兰教法》第 72 条第(2)款关于将欺诈作为宣告婚姻无效的理由的解释。申请人作为婚姻无效理由提出的同性恋形式的性障碍可被视为丈夫对妻子实施的欺诈行为,因为丈夫故意隐瞒了自己的性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Juridical Analysis of Judges' Considerations in Cancellation of Marriage Because Husband Likes the Same Sex (Study of Decision Number 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK)
The ideal marriage is a marriage between a man and a woman who by nature have an attraction to the opposite sex. In the life of the community there are some men who have sexual orientation with fellow men, not to women as the opposite sex. The purpose of this study is to determine the judge's legal basis in annulling a marriage with a husband who is a same-sex lover (homosexual) in decision number 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.YK. The type of research used is normative legal research, with research data in the form of secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. In addition, interviews were also conducted with judges who decided this case at the Yogyakarta Religious Court to complement secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the legal basis for the judge's consideration in annulling the marriage between a woman and her same-sex lover husband in case number: 176/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Yk, is the provisions of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI along with the explanation of Article 72 paragraph (2) KHI concerning fraud as a reason for annulling marriage. The sexual disorder in the form of homosexuality submitted by the applicant as a reason for annulment can be accepted as fraud committed by the husband to the wife, because the husband deliberately concealed his sexual disorder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信