对宾诺莫交易欺诈犯罪行为受害者的法律保护

Bayu Butar Butar, Ahmad Sudiro
{"title":"对宾诺莫交易欺诈犯罪行为受害者的法律保护","authors":"Bayu Butar Butar, Ahmad Sudiro","doi":"10.55047/polri.v3i1.1047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to analyze the recovery of assets and the protection of victims in cases of Binomo trading fraud under Indonesian criminal law. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing a literature-based approach. The findings of this study reveal that the decision made by the Panel of Judges in case number 1240: Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng was deemed unjust for the victims, leading to an appeal hearing resulting in decision number 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BTN. According to this court decision, the confiscated evidence in the Indra Kenz case was to be returned to the victims through the United Indonesian Traders Association. However, the process of returning the evidence encountered complications due to internal conflicts among the victim association members. As a result, there is currently no clarity regarding the completion of the restitution of the victims' losses. The government, through the LPSK, regulates the restitution of victims' losses as stipulated in Perma Number 1 of 2022. Nevertheless, the LPSK is not involved in the process of returning the victims' losses, which is instead handled by the United Indonesian Traders Association.","PeriodicalId":499977,"journal":{"name":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"64 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN BINOMO TRADING FRAUD\",\"authors\":\"Bayu Butar Butar, Ahmad Sudiro\",\"doi\":\"10.55047/polri.v3i1.1047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to analyze the recovery of assets and the protection of victims in cases of Binomo trading fraud under Indonesian criminal law. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing a literature-based approach. The findings of this study reveal that the decision made by the Panel of Judges in case number 1240: Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng was deemed unjust for the victims, leading to an appeal hearing resulting in decision number 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BTN. According to this court decision, the confiscated evidence in the Indra Kenz case was to be returned to the victims through the United Indonesian Traders Association. However, the process of returning the evidence encountered complications due to internal conflicts among the victim association members. As a result, there is currently no clarity regarding the completion of the restitution of the victims' losses. The government, through the LPSK, regulates the restitution of victims' losses as stipulated in Perma Number 1 of 2022. Nevertheless, the LPSK is not involved in the process of returning the victims' losses, which is instead handled by the United Indonesian Traders Association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)\",\"volume\":\"64 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.1047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.1047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是分析印度尼西亚刑法规定的比诺莫(Binomo)交易欺诈案中的资产追回和受害者保护问题。采用的研究方法是基于文献的规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,法官小组在第 1240.Pid.Sus/2022/PN.号案件中做出的裁决是错误的:Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng一案中法官小组做出的裁决被认为对受害者不公正,因此进行了上诉听证,最终做出了第117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BTN号裁决。根据该法院裁决,Indra Kenz 案中被没收的证据应通过印度尼西亚联合贸易商协会归还给受害者。然而,由于受害者协会成员之间的内部矛盾,归还证据的过程变得复杂起来。因此,目前尚不清楚受害者损失的归还工作是否已经完成。根据 2022 年第 1 号许可证的规定,政府通过 LPSK 管理受害者损失的归还工作。然而,印尼盾局并不参与归还受害者损失的过程,而是由印尼贸易商联合协会负责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN BINOMO TRADING FRAUD
The objective of this study is to analyze the recovery of assets and the protection of victims in cases of Binomo trading fraud under Indonesian criminal law. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing a literature-based approach. The findings of this study reveal that the decision made by the Panel of Judges in case number 1240: Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tng was deemed unjust for the victims, leading to an appeal hearing resulting in decision number 117/Pid.Sus/2022/PT.BTN. According to this court decision, the confiscated evidence in the Indra Kenz case was to be returned to the victims through the United Indonesian Traders Association. However, the process of returning the evidence encountered complications due to internal conflicts among the victim association members. As a result, there is currently no clarity regarding the completion of the restitution of the victims' losses. The government, through the LPSK, regulates the restitution of victims' losses as stipulated in Perma Number 1 of 2022. Nevertheless, the LPSK is not involved in the process of returning the victims' losses, which is instead handled by the United Indonesian Traders Association.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信