氯胺酮与右美托咪定对腹腔镜子宫切除术中炎性介质释放的影响。随机试验

Mona Raafat Elghamry, T. Naguib, Taysser Mahmoud AbdAlraheem, L. Dawood
{"title":"氯胺酮与右美托咪定对腹腔镜子宫切除术中炎性介质释放的影响。随机试验","authors":"Mona Raafat Elghamry, T. Naguib, Taysser Mahmoud AbdAlraheem, L. Dawood","doi":"10.2174/0125896458278196231229121146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Surgery and anesthesia are sources of patients' stress and release of inflammatory mediators that have adverse effects on wound healing and remote organs.\n \n \n \n To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on perioperative serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP).\n \n \n \n We included 75 patients aged 30-60, ASA I and II, and scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Randomized patients received either intraoperative ketamine (bolus dose 0.25mg/kg then continuous infusion of 250µg/kg/h), dexmedetomidine (1µg/kg bolus dose then continuous infusion of 0.5µg/kg/h), or placebo. The primary outcome was to measure perioperative inflammatory biomarkers. Hemodynamic parameters, Recovery time, and complications were secondary outcomes.\n \n \n \n At 6 and 24 hours, IL-6 significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (113.4±14.1,107.4±13.7;50.1± 8.1,48.2± 8.1;47.7±7.1, 46.01±7.1;p<0.001). Similarly, At 6 and 24 hours, TNF-α significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (81.8±18.6,72.7±16.4; 40.6±7.1, 39.2±6.9;41.6± 7.6,39.9±7.6;p<0.001).The same for CRP (17.4±3.6,40.0±6.0;10.2±1.3,16.2± 1.2;10.9±1.8,16.3±1.9;p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic parameters, there were significant increases in the ketamine group and decreases in the dexmedetomidine group compared to baseline. Recovery time was significantly longer in the ketamine group than in the control and dexmedetomidine group (24.3±6.4,12.6±2.0,13.5±3.3 min, respectively; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding agitation, nausea, and vomiting (P=1,0.126,0.776, respectively).\n \n \n \n Both dexmedetomidine and ketamine could attenuate the inflammatory response. However, dexmedetomidine has a shorter recovery time.\n \n \n \n Trial registry at Pan African Clinical Trials Registry.\n The number is (PACTR201910617459894: date of registration 10/24/2019).\n \n \n \n https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=9479).\n","PeriodicalId":22862,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","volume":"44 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine on Release of Inflammatory Mediators in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. A Randomized Trial\",\"authors\":\"Mona Raafat Elghamry, T. Naguib, Taysser Mahmoud AbdAlraheem, L. Dawood\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0125896458278196231229121146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Surgery and anesthesia are sources of patients' stress and release of inflammatory mediators that have adverse effects on wound healing and remote organs.\\n \\n \\n \\n To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on perioperative serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP).\\n \\n \\n \\n We included 75 patients aged 30-60, ASA I and II, and scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Randomized patients received either intraoperative ketamine (bolus dose 0.25mg/kg then continuous infusion of 250µg/kg/h), dexmedetomidine (1µg/kg bolus dose then continuous infusion of 0.5µg/kg/h), or placebo. The primary outcome was to measure perioperative inflammatory biomarkers. Hemodynamic parameters, Recovery time, and complications were secondary outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n At 6 and 24 hours, IL-6 significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (113.4±14.1,107.4±13.7;50.1± 8.1,48.2± 8.1;47.7±7.1, 46.01±7.1;p<0.001). Similarly, At 6 and 24 hours, TNF-α significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (81.8±18.6,72.7±16.4; 40.6±7.1, 39.2±6.9;41.6± 7.6,39.9±7.6;p<0.001).The same for CRP (17.4±3.6,40.0±6.0;10.2±1.3,16.2± 1.2;10.9±1.8,16.3±1.9;p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic parameters, there were significant increases in the ketamine group and decreases in the dexmedetomidine group compared to baseline. Recovery time was significantly longer in the ketamine group than in the control and dexmedetomidine group (24.3±6.4,12.6±2.0,13.5±3.3 min, respectively; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding agitation, nausea, and vomiting (P=1,0.126,0.776, respectively).\\n \\n \\n \\n Both dexmedetomidine and ketamine could attenuate the inflammatory response. However, dexmedetomidine has a shorter recovery time.\\n \\n \\n \\n Trial registry at Pan African Clinical Trials Registry.\\n The number is (PACTR201910617459894: date of registration 10/24/2019).\\n \\n \\n \\n https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=9479).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Anesthesia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0125896458278196231229121146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0125896458278196231229121146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术和麻醉是患者紧张和释放炎症介质的来源,会对伤口愈合和远处器官产生不利影响。 目的:比较右美托咪定和氯胺酮对围术期血清中炎症生物标志物(白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和C反应蛋白(CRP))水平的影响。 我们纳入了 75 名年龄在 30-60 岁之间、ASA I 级和 II 级、计划进行腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者。随机患者在术中接受氯胺酮(栓塞剂量 0.25 毫克/千克,然后持续输注 250 微克/千克/小时)、右美托咪定(栓塞剂量 1 微克/千克,然后持续输注 0.5 微克/千克/小时)或安慰剂治疗。主要结果是测量围手术期炎症生物标志物。血液动力学参数、恢复时间和并发症是次要结果。 在 6 小时和 24 小时时,对照组 IL-6 与氯胺酮组和右美托咪定组相比明显增加(113.4±14.1, 107.4±13.7;50.1±8.1,48.2±8.1;47.7±7.1, 46.01±7.1;p<0.001)。同样,在 6 小时和 24 小时时,对照组与氯胺酮组和右美托咪定组相比,TNF-α 明显升高(81.8±18.6,72.7±16.4; 40.6±7.1; 50.1±8.7; 48.2±8.1; 47.7±7.1; 46.01±7.1; p<0.001CRP也是如此(17.4±3.6,40.0±6.0;10.2±1.3,16.2±1.2;10.9±1.8,16.3±1.9;p<0.001)。在血流动力学参数方面,与基线相比,氯胺酮组明显增加,右美托咪定组明显减少。氯胺酮组的恢复时间明显长于对照组和右美托咪定组(分别为 24.3±6.4、12.6±2.0、13.5±3.3 分钟;P<0.001)。三组在躁动、恶心和呕吐方面无明显差异(P=1,0.126,0.776)。 右美托咪定和氯胺酮都能减轻炎症反应。不过,右美托咪定的恢复时间更短。 试验登记在泛非临床试验登记处。编号为(PACTR201910617459894:注册日期 10/24/2019)。https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=9479)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine on Release of Inflammatory Mediators in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. A Randomized Trial
Surgery and anesthesia are sources of patients' stress and release of inflammatory mediators that have adverse effects on wound healing and remote organs. To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and ketamine on perioperative serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP). We included 75 patients aged 30-60, ASA I and II, and scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Randomized patients received either intraoperative ketamine (bolus dose 0.25mg/kg then continuous infusion of 250µg/kg/h), dexmedetomidine (1µg/kg bolus dose then continuous infusion of 0.5µg/kg/h), or placebo. The primary outcome was to measure perioperative inflammatory biomarkers. Hemodynamic parameters, Recovery time, and complications were secondary outcomes. At 6 and 24 hours, IL-6 significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (113.4±14.1,107.4±13.7;50.1± 8.1,48.2± 8.1;47.7±7.1, 46.01±7.1;p<0.001). Similarly, At 6 and 24 hours, TNF-α significantly increased in the control group versus ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (81.8±18.6,72.7±16.4; 40.6±7.1, 39.2±6.9;41.6± 7.6,39.9±7.6;p<0.001).The same for CRP (17.4±3.6,40.0±6.0;10.2±1.3,16.2± 1.2;10.9±1.8,16.3±1.9;p<0.001). Regarding hemodynamic parameters, there were significant increases in the ketamine group and decreases in the dexmedetomidine group compared to baseline. Recovery time was significantly longer in the ketamine group than in the control and dexmedetomidine group (24.3±6.4,12.6±2.0,13.5±3.3 min, respectively; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding agitation, nausea, and vomiting (P=1,0.126,0.776, respectively). Both dexmedetomidine and ketamine could attenuate the inflammatory response. However, dexmedetomidine has a shorter recovery time. Trial registry at Pan African Clinical Trials Registry. The number is (PACTR201910617459894: date of registration 10/24/2019). https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=9479).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信