{"title":"对刑事诉讼职能概念的讨论","authors":"Irina V. Novoydarskaya","doi":"10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-52-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking into account the uncertainty remaining for a long time in the theory of criminal procedure law in relation to the concept of “function”, the article analyzes various theoretical approaches to eliminate this uncertainty. The main features of the criminal procedural function are highlighted, their content and significance are clarified. The study used general scientific methods and private scientific methods. As a conclusion, it is proposed to expand and specify the list of features of the function in question.","PeriodicalId":221748,"journal":{"name":"Russian judge","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To the Discussion on the Concept of Criminal Procedure Functions\",\"authors\":\"Irina V. Novoydarskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-52-56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking into account the uncertainty remaining for a long time in the theory of criminal procedure law in relation to the concept of “function”, the article analyzes various theoretical approaches to eliminate this uncertainty. The main features of the criminal procedural function are highlighted, their content and significance are clarified. The study used general scientific methods and private scientific methods. As a conclusion, it is proposed to expand and specify the list of features of the function in question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian judge\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian judge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-52-56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian judge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3791-2024-1-52-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
To the Discussion on the Concept of Criminal Procedure Functions
Taking into account the uncertainty remaining for a long time in the theory of criminal procedure law in relation to the concept of “function”, the article analyzes various theoretical approaches to eliminate this uncertainty. The main features of the criminal procedural function are highlighted, their content and significance are clarified. The study used general scientific methods and private scientific methods. As a conclusion, it is proposed to expand and specify the list of features of the function in question.