局部晚期头颈癌中每周三次顺铂与每周一次顺铂的比较研究

Garima Uikey, Anoop Mantri, Abhishekh Pratap Singh
{"title":"局部晚期头颈癌中每周三次顺铂与每周一次顺铂的比较研究","authors":"Garima Uikey, Anoop Mantri, Abhishekh Pratap Singh","doi":"10.36106/gjra/4305594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population\nwith newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most\ncommon in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in\ncomparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard\nreference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of\ntolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the\nDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck\ncancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every\nweek during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1,\n22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly\ndifferentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV\ndisease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the\ndisease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between\nthe two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation\ntherapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.","PeriodicalId":12664,"journal":{"name":"Global journal for research analysis","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE WEEKLY CISPLATIN VERSUS WEEKLY CISPLATIN IN LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD & NECK CANCER\",\"authors\":\"Garima Uikey, Anoop Mantri, Abhishekh Pratap Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/gjra/4305594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population\\nwith newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most\\ncommon in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in\\ncomparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard\\nreference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of\\ntolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the\\nDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck\\ncancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every\\nweek during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1,\\n22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly\\ndifferentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV\\ndisease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the\\ndisease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between\\nthe two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation\\ntherapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/4305594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal for research analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/4305594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:头颈部癌症是全球十大癌症之一。印度每年登记的新确诊癌症患者人数较多。其中,口腔癌在印度最为常见。手术是治疗的主要手段。在晚期病例中,同步放化疗与单纯手术相比效果更好。顺铂是最好的放射增敏剂,已被接受为标准参考方案。本研究旨在比较两种不同剂量的顺铂对治疗的耐受性和反应。研究方法:本前瞻性比较研究在印多尔政府癌症医院放射肿瘤科进行。共纳入 60 名局部晚期头颈部肿瘤患者,分为两组。A组有30名患者接受根治性放疗,并在放疗期间每周给予顺铂;B组患者接受根治性放疗,并在第1、22和43天同时给予顺铂。nding 反应采用 RECIST 1.1 标准。比例比较采用 Pearson Chisquare 检验。结果:两组患者均以男性居多。41.7%为中度分化癌,31.7%为低度分化癌。55%的患者有增殖生长。66.7%处于III期,33.3%处于IV期。A组和B组分别有60%和70%的患者获得完全缓解。A组和B组分别有10%和3%的患者病情恶化。两组患者的黏膜炎、皮炎、口腔干燥、咀嚼障碍、吞咽困难、贫血、血小板减少等症状均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论我们的研究发现,在放疗的第 1、22 和 43 天同时给予顺铂治疗,疗效更佳,疾病进展的发生率更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE WEEKLY CISPLATIN VERSUS WEEKLY CISPLATIN IN LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD & NECK CANCER
Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population with newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most common in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in comparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard reference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of tolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck cancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every week during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1, 22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly differentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV disease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the disease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between the two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation therapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信