{"title":"局部晚期头颈癌中每周三次顺铂与每周一次顺铂的比较研究","authors":"Garima Uikey, Anoop Mantri, Abhishekh Pratap Singh","doi":"10.36106/gjra/4305594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population\nwith newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most\ncommon in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in\ncomparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard\nreference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of\ntolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the\nDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck\ncancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every\nweek during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1,\n22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly\ndifferentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV\ndisease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the\ndisease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between\nthe two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation\ntherapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.","PeriodicalId":12664,"journal":{"name":"Global journal for research analysis","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE WEEKLY CISPLATIN VERSUS WEEKLY CISPLATIN IN LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD & NECK CANCER\",\"authors\":\"Garima Uikey, Anoop Mantri, Abhishekh Pratap Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/gjra/4305594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population\\nwith newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most\\ncommon in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in\\ncomparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard\\nreference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of\\ntolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the\\nDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck\\ncancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every\\nweek during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1,\\n22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly\\ndifferentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV\\ndisease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the\\ndisease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between\\nthe two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation\\ntherapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/4305594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal for research analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/4305594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THREE WEEKLY CISPLATIN VERSUS WEEKLY CISPLATIN IN LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD & NECK CANCER
Background: The head and neck cancers rank among the top 10 cancers globally. A huger population
with newly diagnosed cancers is registered in India every year. Of these oral cancers are the most
common in India. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown better results in
comparison to surgery alone in advanced cases. Cisplatin is the best radiosensitizer and has been accepted as the standard
reference regimen. The present study was carried out to compare two different dosing schedules of cisplatin in terms of
tolerance and response to the treatment. Methodology: The present prospective, comparative study was carried out in the
Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Cancer Hospital, Indore. 60 patients with local advanced head and neck
cancers were included, divided into two arms. Arm-A with 30 patients received radical radiotherapy with cisplatin given every
week during the radiotherapy sessions, while Arm-B patients received radical radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin on day 1,
22 and 43. The RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for nding out the response. Proportional comparison was done using Pearson Chisquare test. Results: There was a male preponderance in both the arms. 41.7% had moderately and 31.7% had poorly
differentiated histological carcinoma grades. 55% had proliferative growth. 66.7% were in stage III and 33.3% were in stage IV
disease. 60% in Arm-A and 70% in Arm-B had complete response. 10% in Arm-A and 3% in Arm-B had progression of the
disease. Mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, trismus, dysphagia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, etc. all were comparable between
the two arms (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our study found that cisplatin if given on day 1, 22 and 43 concurrently with radiation
therapy has better outcome with lower incidence of disease progression.