{"title":"问题式学习模式对厦大年级学生在酸性课题上的多元表征能力的影响","authors":"Ifa Datul, Ivan Ashif Ardhana","doi":"10.26740/ujced.v13n1.p25-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It takes the ability to conceive at three different levels of representation, macroscopic, sub microscopic, and symbolic to comprehend acid-base material. Still, most students are unable to make the connection between the three levels of representation. As a result, instruction that helps students connect various representations in acid-base content is required. The PBL model is one appropriate learning paradigm that can be used. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PBL models and conventional models differ in their capacity to support numerous representations. A quantitative experiment using a quasi-experimental study design is the research methodology employed. A post-test-only control group design is used in this study. The samples of this study were XI MIPA 3 as a control group of 34 students and XI MIPA 4 as an experimental group of 33 students. Simple random sampling was used to get the research samples. A post-test consisting of multiple-choice questions was the instrument utilized. With a reliability score of 0,802 across 20 items, the empirical validation results indicate that all instruments are appropriate for use as research measures. methods for gathering data through tests. Data collection techniques in the form of tests. The data analysis technique in this study is descriptive and inferential statistics with hypothesis testing in the form of the Independent Sample t-Test. With a sig value of 0,000 < 0,05, the results demonstrated that there is a difference in the ability of multiple representations between those taught using the PBL model and those taught using the conventional model.","PeriodicalId":31518,"journal":{"name":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECT THE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING MODEL ON ABILITY MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS OF XI-GRADE STUDENTS ON ACID-BASED TOPIC\",\"authors\":\"Ifa Datul, Ivan Ashif Ardhana\",\"doi\":\"10.26740/ujced.v13n1.p25-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It takes the ability to conceive at three different levels of representation, macroscopic, sub microscopic, and symbolic to comprehend acid-base material. Still, most students are unable to make the connection between the three levels of representation. As a result, instruction that helps students connect various representations in acid-base content is required. The PBL model is one appropriate learning paradigm that can be used. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PBL models and conventional models differ in their capacity to support numerous representations. A quantitative experiment using a quasi-experimental study design is the research methodology employed. A post-test-only control group design is used in this study. The samples of this study were XI MIPA 3 as a control group of 34 students and XI MIPA 4 as an experimental group of 33 students. Simple random sampling was used to get the research samples. A post-test consisting of multiple-choice questions was the instrument utilized. With a reliability score of 0,802 across 20 items, the empirical validation results indicate that all instruments are appropriate for use as research measures. methods for gathering data through tests. Data collection techniques in the form of tests. The data analysis technique in this study is descriptive and inferential statistics with hypothesis testing in the form of the Independent Sample t-Test. With a sig value of 0,000 < 0,05, the results demonstrated that there is a difference in the ability of multiple representations between those taught using the PBL model and those taught using the conventional model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v13n1.p25-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unesa Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v13n1.p25-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
要理解酸碱物质,需要具备从宏观、亚微观和符号三个不同表象层面进行构思的能力。然而,大多数学生无法将这三个表象层次联系起来。因此,需要在教学中帮助学生将酸碱内容中的各种表征联系起来。PBL 模式是一种可以采用的适当学习范式。本研究旨在确定 PBL 模式和传统模式在支持多种表征的能力上是否存在差异。研究方法采用了准实验研究设计的定量实验。本研究采用了只进行后测的对照组设计。本研究的样本是由 34 名学生组成的对照组 XI MIPA 3 和由 33 名学生组成的实验组 XI MIPA 4。研究样本采用简单随机抽样法。使用的工具是由多项选择题组成的后测。20 个项目的信度为 0.802,经验验证结果表明,所有工具都适合用作研究措施。测试形式的数据收集技术。本研究的数据分析技术是描述性和推断性统计,并以独立样本 t 检验的形式进行假设检验。结果表明,使用 PBL 模式教学的学生与使用传统模式教学的学生在多重表征能力方面存在差异,Sig 值为 0,000 < 0,05。
EFFECT THE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING MODEL ON ABILITY MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS OF XI-GRADE STUDENTS ON ACID-BASED TOPIC
It takes the ability to conceive at three different levels of representation, macroscopic, sub microscopic, and symbolic to comprehend acid-base material. Still, most students are unable to make the connection between the three levels of representation. As a result, instruction that helps students connect various representations in acid-base content is required. The PBL model is one appropriate learning paradigm that can be used. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PBL models and conventional models differ in their capacity to support numerous representations. A quantitative experiment using a quasi-experimental study design is the research methodology employed. A post-test-only control group design is used in this study. The samples of this study were XI MIPA 3 as a control group of 34 students and XI MIPA 4 as an experimental group of 33 students. Simple random sampling was used to get the research samples. A post-test consisting of multiple-choice questions was the instrument utilized. With a reliability score of 0,802 across 20 items, the empirical validation results indicate that all instruments are appropriate for use as research measures. methods for gathering data through tests. Data collection techniques in the form of tests. The data analysis technique in this study is descriptive and inferential statistics with hypothesis testing in the form of the Independent Sample t-Test. With a sig value of 0,000 < 0,05, the results demonstrated that there is a difference in the ability of multiple representations between those taught using the PBL model and those taught using the conventional model.