人工智能的主观性问题

S. V. Zykov
{"title":"人工智能的主观性问题","authors":"S. V. Zykov","doi":"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.131-139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In connection with the problem of inclusion of objects produced by artificial intelligence (AI) into civil transactions turnover, the issue of subjectivity of rights to them must be resolved. One of the possible solutions (some researchers call it the main one) is considering granting the status of a subject of law to artificial intelligence itself. The paper is devoted to criticism of this approach.The social behavior of people is formed on the basis of their physical essence, this relationship will remain valid in the future. It is obvious that artificial intelligence is obviously devoid of physical essence. Even if we talk about a legal entity (in a number of systems, which are fictitious entities), the consequences of its activities are one way or another assigned to individuals.It seems appropriate to endow AI with the object characteristics of an intellectual complex — in line with property complexes in civil law, assigning initial rights to computer program developers. Considering AI as a subject of civil legal relations seems not only unjustified, but also prevents a doctrinal solution to the issue of legal personality, which is a prerequisite for the formation of the norms of current legislation.","PeriodicalId":158497,"journal":{"name":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem of Subjectivity of Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"S. V. Zykov\",\"doi\":\"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.131-139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In connection with the problem of inclusion of objects produced by artificial intelligence (AI) into civil transactions turnover, the issue of subjectivity of rights to them must be resolved. One of the possible solutions (some researchers call it the main one) is considering granting the status of a subject of law to artificial intelligence itself. The paper is devoted to criticism of this approach.The social behavior of people is formed on the basis of their physical essence, this relationship will remain valid in the future. It is obvious that artificial intelligence is obviously devoid of physical essence. Even if we talk about a legal entity (in a number of systems, which are fictitious entities), the consequences of its activities are one way or another assigned to individuals.It seems appropriate to endow AI with the object characteristics of an intellectual complex — in line with property complexes in civil law, assigning initial rights to computer program developers. Considering AI as a subject of civil legal relations seems not only unjustified, but also prevents a doctrinal solution to the issue of legal personality, which is a prerequisite for the formation of the norms of current legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.131-139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.131-139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于将人工智能(AI)生产的物品纳入民事交易流转的问题,必须解决其权利的主体性问题。可能的解决方案之一(一些研究者称之为主要解决方案)是考虑赋予人工智能本身法律主体的地位。人们的社会行为是在其身体本质的基础上形成的,这种关系在未来依然有效。很明显,人工智能显然不具备物理本质。即使我们谈论的是一个法律实体(在许多系统中,这些实体都是虚构的),其活动的后果也是以这样或那样的方式分配给个人的。赋予人工智能以智力综合体的客体特征似乎是合适的--与民法中的财产综合体相一致,将初始权利分配给计算机程序开发者。将人工智能视为民事法律关系的主体似乎不仅不合理,而且还妨碍从理论上解决法律人格问题,而这正是形成现行立法规范的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem of Subjectivity of Artificial Intelligence
In connection with the problem of inclusion of objects produced by artificial intelligence (AI) into civil transactions turnover, the issue of subjectivity of rights to them must be resolved. One of the possible solutions (some researchers call it the main one) is considering granting the status of a subject of law to artificial intelligence itself. The paper is devoted to criticism of this approach.The social behavior of people is formed on the basis of their physical essence, this relationship will remain valid in the future. It is obvious that artificial intelligence is obviously devoid of physical essence. Even if we talk about a legal entity (in a number of systems, which are fictitious entities), the consequences of its activities are one way or another assigned to individuals.It seems appropriate to endow AI with the object characteristics of an intellectual complex — in line with property complexes in civil law, assigning initial rights to computer program developers. Considering AI as a subject of civil legal relations seems not only unjustified, but also prevents a doctrinal solution to the issue of legal personality, which is a prerequisite for the formation of the norms of current legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信