仲裁程序中发展的关系与民事诉讼法的主题

S. S. Kazikhanova
{"title":"仲裁程序中发展的关系与民事诉讼法的主题","authors":"S. S. Kazikhanova","doi":"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.046-053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the question of whether relations developing in arbitration proceedings are included in the subject of civil procedure law. The author describes the positions of researchers and the arguments justifying them. In the paper, the author derives a criterion for the unification of public relations under the subject of civil procedure law. As such a criterion the paper defines an objective social need or interest in the legal regulation of certain public relations in a unified system of procedural safeguards (in a civil procedural form), taking into account the nature of these relations and ensuring to the maximum extent the real protection of the rights and legally protected interests of persons. It is concluded that the legal regulation of public relations developing with the arbitral tribunal is designed to satisfy the need for a qualitatively different procedure for resolving civil cases as compared with the system of justice. These relations objectively are non-procedural in their nature and are not included in the subject matter of law of civil procedure. In confirmation, the fact is given that in arbitration proceedings there is a rejection regarding procedural guarantees that are fundamental for civil procedure law.","PeriodicalId":158497,"journal":{"name":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relations Developing in Arbitration Proceedings and the Subject of Civil Procedure Law\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Kazikhanova\",\"doi\":\"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.046-053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines the question of whether relations developing in arbitration proceedings are included in the subject of civil procedure law. The author describes the positions of researchers and the arguments justifying them. In the paper, the author derives a criterion for the unification of public relations under the subject of civil procedure law. As such a criterion the paper defines an objective social need or interest in the legal regulation of certain public relations in a unified system of procedural safeguards (in a civil procedural form), taking into account the nature of these relations and ensuring to the maximum extent the real protection of the rights and legally protected interests of persons. It is concluded that the legal regulation of public relations developing with the arbitral tribunal is designed to satisfy the need for a qualitatively different procedure for resolving civil cases as compared with the system of justice. These relations objectively are non-procedural in their nature and are not included in the subject matter of law of civil procedure. In confirmation, the fact is given that in arbitration proceedings there is a rejection regarding procedural guarantees that are fundamental for civil procedure law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.046-053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.046-053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了仲裁程序中发展的关系是否属于民事诉讼法范畴的问题。作者描述了研究者的立场和支持这些立场的论据。在本文中,作者提出了将公共关系统一到民事诉讼法主题下的标准。作为这一标准,本文界定了在统一的程序保障体系(民事诉讼形式)中对某些公共关系进行法律规制的客观社会需求或利益,同时考虑到这些关系的性质,并最大限度地确保真正保护人们的权利和受法律保护的利益。结论是,对与仲裁庭发展的公共关系进行法律规范,是为了满足与司法系统相比在解决民事案件的程序上有质的不同的需要。这些关系客观上是非程序性的,不属于民事诉讼法的范畴。可以确认的事实是,在仲裁程序中,作为民事诉讼法基础的程序保障遭到了拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relations Developing in Arbitration Proceedings and the Subject of Civil Procedure Law
The paper examines the question of whether relations developing in arbitration proceedings are included in the subject of civil procedure law. The author describes the positions of researchers and the arguments justifying them. In the paper, the author derives a criterion for the unification of public relations under the subject of civil procedure law. As such a criterion the paper defines an objective social need or interest in the legal regulation of certain public relations in a unified system of procedural safeguards (in a civil procedural form), taking into account the nature of these relations and ensuring to the maximum extent the real protection of the rights and legally protected interests of persons. It is concluded that the legal regulation of public relations developing with the arbitral tribunal is designed to satisfy the need for a qualitatively different procedure for resolving civil cases as compared with the system of justice. These relations objectively are non-procedural in their nature and are not included in the subject matter of law of civil procedure. In confirmation, the fact is given that in arbitration proceedings there is a rejection regarding procedural guarantees that are fundamental for civil procedure law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信