经济危机条件下的创业风险:执法实践分析

G. E. Guseinova
{"title":"经济危机条件下的创业风险:执法实践分析","authors":"G. E. Guseinova","doi":"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.151-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of the risk category is generally recognized in Russian civil law. This institution becomes even more relevant in times of crisis, in times of economic instability and market volatility. An analysis of current judicial practice demonstrates that during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the introduction of sanctions restrictions, entrepreneurs were often forced to resort to amendment and termination of contracts due to a significant change in circumstances and to file claims for exemption from liability for violation of contractual obligations due to the occurrence of the force majeure. Russian courts apply these legal institutions in close connection with the category of business risk, however, due to the lack of a legal definition of this term and the wide variety of concepts of risk in legal doctrine, judicial discretion plays a significant role in resolving cases. Extremely broad discretionary powers of judges and legal uncertainty regarding business risk can lead to destabilization of civil law transactions and negatively affect the economic development of Russia. In this regard, the author advocates consolidating the concept of business risk, as well as its permissible and justified limits, if not at the legislative level, then at least in the explanations of Russian higher courts.","PeriodicalId":158497,"journal":{"name":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","volume":"268 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrepreneurial Risk in Conditions of Economic Crisis: Analysis of Law Enforcement Practice\",\"authors\":\"G. E. Guseinova\",\"doi\":\"10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.151-159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The significance of the risk category is generally recognized in Russian civil law. This institution becomes even more relevant in times of crisis, in times of economic instability and market volatility. An analysis of current judicial practice demonstrates that during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the introduction of sanctions restrictions, entrepreneurs were often forced to resort to amendment and termination of contracts due to a significant change in circumstances and to file claims for exemption from liability for violation of contractual obligations due to the occurrence of the force majeure. Russian courts apply these legal institutions in close connection with the category of business risk, however, due to the lack of a legal definition of this term and the wide variety of concepts of risk in legal doctrine, judicial discretion plays a significant role in resolving cases. Extremely broad discretionary powers of judges and legal uncertainty regarding business risk can lead to destabilization of civil law transactions and negatively affect the economic development of Russia. In this regard, the author advocates consolidating the concept of business risk, as well as its permissible and justified limits, if not at the legislative level, then at least in the explanations of Russian higher courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"volume\":\"268 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual Problems of Russian Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.151-159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual Problems of Russian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.151-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯民法普遍承认风险类别的重要性。在危机时期,在经济不稳定和市场波动时期,这一制度变得更加重要。对当前司法实践的分析表明,在 COVID-19 冠状病毒大流行和实行制裁限制期间,企业家往往被迫以情况发生重大变化为由修改和终止合同,并以发生不可抗力为由要求免除违反合同义务的责任。俄罗斯法院适用的这些法律制度与商业风险类别密切相关,但由于缺乏对这一术语的法 律定义,且法理中的风险概念多种多样,司法裁量权在案件解决中发挥着重要作用。法官极其广泛的自由裁量权和有关商业风险的法律不确定性会导致民法交易的不稳定,并对俄罗斯的经济发展产生负面影响。为此,作者主张即使不在立法层面,至少也要在俄罗斯高级法院的解释中对商业风险的概念及其允许的和合理的限度进行整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entrepreneurial Risk in Conditions of Economic Crisis: Analysis of Law Enforcement Practice
The significance of the risk category is generally recognized in Russian civil law. This institution becomes even more relevant in times of crisis, in times of economic instability and market volatility. An analysis of current judicial practice demonstrates that during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the introduction of sanctions restrictions, entrepreneurs were often forced to resort to amendment and termination of contracts due to a significant change in circumstances and to file claims for exemption from liability for violation of contractual obligations due to the occurrence of the force majeure. Russian courts apply these legal institutions in close connection with the category of business risk, however, due to the lack of a legal definition of this term and the wide variety of concepts of risk in legal doctrine, judicial discretion plays a significant role in resolving cases. Extremely broad discretionary powers of judges and legal uncertainty regarding business risk can lead to destabilization of civil law transactions and negatively affect the economic development of Russia. In this regard, the author advocates consolidating the concept of business risk, as well as its permissible and justified limits, if not at the legislative level, then at least in the explanations of Russian higher courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信