拉斯穆森综合征:来自难治性癫痫参考资料中心的病例系列研究和文献修订

Q4 Medicine
M. Serôdio, Marcela Pires, Laura Azurara, Alexandra Santos, Francisca Sá, Rita Silva, Nuno Canas, José Carlos Ferreira, Pedro Cabral
{"title":"拉斯穆森综合征:来自难治性癫痫参考资料中心的病例系列研究和文献修订","authors":"M. Serôdio, Marcela Pires, Laura Azurara, Alexandra Santos, Francisca Sá, Rita Silva, Nuno Canas, José Carlos Ferreira, Pedro Cabral","doi":"10.46531/sinapse/ao/230070/2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIntroduction: Rasmussen’s syndrome (RS) is a rare immunomediated disease of childhood-predominant onset, presenting with refractory epilepsy and neurological deficits associated to progressive brain hemiatrophy. Its pathophysiological mechanisms are not well understood, and the effect of immunotherapy is not ascertained. Hemispheric surgery is an efficacious therapy for epilepsy, despite focal and cognitive sequelae. Curative treatment and ideal timing for surgery are still not defined. Our study aim is to describe a pediatric case-series with RS evaluated in a Reference Center for Refractory Epilepsy and compare our results with the available literature. \n \nMethods: Review of clinical, neurophysiological, radiological, therapeutics and prognosis characteristics of pediatric patients evaluated in our center with RS since 2006. \n \nResults: Eight children were included (median age of onset 8.0 years), seven with left hemisphere dysfunction. Up until surgery/present moment, four presented epilepsia partialis continua, six had focal deficits and four had cognitive decline. Most patients revealed unilateral atrophy and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity with frontal predominance in the last magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the last video-EEG, all patients had ipsilateral interictal epileptiform activity and one had contralateral epileptiform activity as well. PET/SPECT was used in three patients and functional MRI in one patient for language lateralization. Four were submitted to surgery (three hemispherectomies, one frontal resection), having all previously done immunoglobulin, three corticosteroids and two tacrolimus. In the first year post-surgery, two patients were seizure-free, with the others with a significant improvement of their seizures; the patient submitted to frontal resection did not present surgical sequelae, with the remaining having motor and cognitive sequelae (albeit one with language improvement). Among patients not submitted to surgery, all maintain refractory epilepsy with at least four antiseizure drugs, with immunoglobulin been used in three patients, corticosteroids in two and tacrolimus in one. \n \nConclusion: The management of RS is challenging regarding the balance between seizure control and the neurological surgical deficits. Our sample reflects the literature data, according to which hemispherectomy is the most effective therapy for seizure control, despite causing significant morbidity, rising questions about its timing. \n","PeriodicalId":53695,"journal":{"name":"Sinapse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasmussen’s Syndrome: Case-Series Study from a Refractory Epilepsy Reference Center and Revision of Literature\",\"authors\":\"M. Serôdio, Marcela Pires, Laura Azurara, Alexandra Santos, Francisca Sá, Rita Silva, Nuno Canas, José Carlos Ferreira, Pedro Cabral\",\"doi\":\"10.46531/sinapse/ao/230070/2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIntroduction: Rasmussen’s syndrome (RS) is a rare immunomediated disease of childhood-predominant onset, presenting with refractory epilepsy and neurological deficits associated to progressive brain hemiatrophy. Its pathophysiological mechanisms are not well understood, and the effect of immunotherapy is not ascertained. Hemispheric surgery is an efficacious therapy for epilepsy, despite focal and cognitive sequelae. Curative treatment and ideal timing for surgery are still not defined. Our study aim is to describe a pediatric case-series with RS evaluated in a Reference Center for Refractory Epilepsy and compare our results with the available literature. \\n \\nMethods: Review of clinical, neurophysiological, radiological, therapeutics and prognosis characteristics of pediatric patients evaluated in our center with RS since 2006. \\n \\nResults: Eight children were included (median age of onset 8.0 years), seven with left hemisphere dysfunction. Up until surgery/present moment, four presented epilepsia partialis continua, six had focal deficits and four had cognitive decline. Most patients revealed unilateral atrophy and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity with frontal predominance in the last magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the last video-EEG, all patients had ipsilateral interictal epileptiform activity and one had contralateral epileptiform activity as well. PET/SPECT was used in three patients and functional MRI in one patient for language lateralization. Four were submitted to surgery (three hemispherectomies, one frontal resection), having all previously done immunoglobulin, three corticosteroids and two tacrolimus. In the first year post-surgery, two patients were seizure-free, with the others with a significant improvement of their seizures; the patient submitted to frontal resection did not present surgical sequelae, with the remaining having motor and cognitive sequelae (albeit one with language improvement). Among patients not submitted to surgery, all maintain refractory epilepsy with at least four antiseizure drugs, with immunoglobulin been used in three patients, corticosteroids in two and tacrolimus in one. \\n \\nConclusion: The management of RS is challenging regarding the balance between seizure control and the neurological surgical deficits. Our sample reflects the literature data, according to which hemispherectomy is the most effective therapy for seizure control, despite causing significant morbidity, rising questions about its timing. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sinapse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sinapse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/ao/230070/2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sinapse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/ao/230070/2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介拉斯穆森综合征(Rasmussen's Syndrome,RS)是一种罕见的免疫介导疾病,主要在儿童时期发病,表现为难治性癫痫和进行性脑半影相关的神经功能缺损。该病的病理生理机制尚不清楚,免疫疗法的效果也未确定。尽管存在病灶和认知后遗症,半球手术仍是治疗癫痫的有效方法。治愈性治疗和理想的手术时机仍未确定。我们的研究目的是描述在难治性癫痫参考资料中心评估的一个小儿 RS 病例系列,并将我们的结果与现有文献进行比较。 研究方法回顾自 2006 年以来在本中心接受评估的 RS 儿童患者的临床、神经电生理、放射学、治疗和预后特征。 结果共纳入八名儿童(发病年龄中位数为 8.0 岁),其中七名患有左半球功能障碍。截至手术前/目前,四名患儿出现癫痫部分性持续状态,六名患儿出现局灶性障碍,四名患儿出现认知能力下降。大多数患者在最后一次磁共振成像(MRI)中显示出单侧萎缩和额叶为主的T2/FLAIR高密度。在最后一次视频脑电图检查中,所有患者都有同侧发作间期癫痫样活动,其中一名患者还有对侧癫痫样活动。PET/SPECT 用于三名患者,功能磁共振成像用于一名患者的语言侧位。四名患者接受了手术治疗(三例半球切除术,一例额叶切除术),之前都注射过免疫球蛋白,三例皮质类固醇,两例他克莫司。手术后第一年,两名患者癫痫不再发作,其他患者的癫痫发作也有明显改善;接受额叶切除术的患者没有出现手术后遗症,其余患者有运动和认知后遗症(尽管其中一人的语言能力有所改善)。在未接受手术的患者中,所有患者都使用了至少四种抗癫痫药物来维持难治性癫痫,其中三名患者使用了免疫球蛋白,两名患者使用了皮质类固醇,一名患者使用了他克莫司。 结论RS的治疗在控制癫痫发作和神经系统手术缺陷之间的平衡具有挑战性。我们的样本反映了文献数据,根据这些数据,半球切除术是控制癫痫发作最有效的治疗方法,尽管会导致显著的发病率,但也引起了关于手术时机的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rasmussen’s Syndrome: Case-Series Study from a Refractory Epilepsy Reference Center and Revision of Literature
Introduction: Rasmussen’s syndrome (RS) is a rare immunomediated disease of childhood-predominant onset, presenting with refractory epilepsy and neurological deficits associated to progressive brain hemiatrophy. Its pathophysiological mechanisms are not well understood, and the effect of immunotherapy is not ascertained. Hemispheric surgery is an efficacious therapy for epilepsy, despite focal and cognitive sequelae. Curative treatment and ideal timing for surgery are still not defined. Our study aim is to describe a pediatric case-series with RS evaluated in a Reference Center for Refractory Epilepsy and compare our results with the available literature. Methods: Review of clinical, neurophysiological, radiological, therapeutics and prognosis characteristics of pediatric patients evaluated in our center with RS since 2006. Results: Eight children were included (median age of onset 8.0 years), seven with left hemisphere dysfunction. Up until surgery/present moment, four presented epilepsia partialis continua, six had focal deficits and four had cognitive decline. Most patients revealed unilateral atrophy and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity with frontal predominance in the last magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the last video-EEG, all patients had ipsilateral interictal epileptiform activity and one had contralateral epileptiform activity as well. PET/SPECT was used in three patients and functional MRI in one patient for language lateralization. Four were submitted to surgery (three hemispherectomies, one frontal resection), having all previously done immunoglobulin, three corticosteroids and two tacrolimus. In the first year post-surgery, two patients were seizure-free, with the others with a significant improvement of their seizures; the patient submitted to frontal resection did not present surgical sequelae, with the remaining having motor and cognitive sequelae (albeit one with language improvement). Among patients not submitted to surgery, all maintain refractory epilepsy with at least four antiseizure drugs, with immunoglobulin been used in three patients, corticosteroids in two and tacrolimus in one. Conclusion: The management of RS is challenging regarding the balance between seizure control and the neurological surgical deficits. Our sample reflects the literature data, according to which hemispherectomy is the most effective therapy for seizure control, despite causing significant morbidity, rising questions about its timing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sinapse
Sinapse Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信