仲裁条款和仲裁机构在法院外解决争议实践中的绝对权力

Femmy Syamana, Zil Aidi
{"title":"仲裁条款和仲裁机构在法院外解决争议实践中的绝对权力","authors":"Femmy Syamana, Zil Aidi","doi":"10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, the settlement of disputes through arbitration is regulated by Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Problem Resolutions. Article 7 Law no. 30 of 1999 stipulates that the parties can agree to an agreement on a dispute that has occurred or will occur between them to be resolved through arbitration with a written agreement agreed upon by the parties. In the selection of arbitral settlement there is a link between the arbitration clause and the selection of settlement through arbitration as well as the implementation of absolute authority and the selection of arbitral institutions in the practice of dispute resolution outside the court. The approach method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution is based on a contract in accordance with what is implied in Article 7 and Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999, and in this case the parties to the agreement agree to include an arbitration clause, The court is bound by the agreement made by the parties, with the provisions of the article, the absolute competence of arbitration is born when the parties expressly choose to resolve disputes through an arbitration forum where this has been accommodated in Article 3, Article 4, Article 10 and Article 11 paragraphs (1) and (2) in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which negates the authority of court institutions to examine cases that are already bound by an arbitration clause.","PeriodicalId":508337,"journal":{"name":"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Klausul Arbitrase dan Kewenangan Absolut Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Praktek Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan\",\"authors\":\"Femmy Syamana, Zil Aidi\",\"doi\":\"10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Indonesia, the settlement of disputes through arbitration is regulated by Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Problem Resolutions. Article 7 Law no. 30 of 1999 stipulates that the parties can agree to an agreement on a dispute that has occurred or will occur between them to be resolved through arbitration with a written agreement agreed upon by the parties. In the selection of arbitral settlement there is a link between the arbitration clause and the selection of settlement through arbitration as well as the implementation of absolute authority and the selection of arbitral institutions in the practice of dispute resolution outside the court. The approach method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution is based on a contract in accordance with what is implied in Article 7 and Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999, and in this case the parties to the agreement agree to include an arbitration clause, The court is bound by the agreement made by the parties, with the provisions of the article, the absolute competence of arbitration is born when the parties expressly choose to resolve disputes through an arbitration forum where this has been accommodated in Article 3, Article 4, Article 10 and Article 11 paragraphs (1) and (2) in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which negates the authority of court institutions to examine cases that are already bound by an arbitration clause.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reslaj : Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i3.5101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,通过仲裁解决争议受 1999 年关于仲裁和替代性问题解决方案的第 30 号法律管辖。1999 年第 30 号法律第 7 条规定,当事人可就他们之间已经发生或将要发生的争议达成协议,通过仲裁解决争议,并由当事人达成书面协议。在选择仲裁解决方式时,仲裁条款与选择仲裁解决方式之间存在着联系,同时在法院之外解决争议的实践中,执行绝对权威和选择仲裁机构也存在着联系。所使用的方法是规范法学方法。研究结果表明,根据 1999 年第 30 号法律第 7 条和第 9 条第(1)款的规定,选择仲裁作为争议解决方式是以合同为基础的、当当事人明确选择通过仲裁机构解决争议时,仲裁的绝对权限便产生了,1999 年第 30 号法律《仲裁和非诉讼争议解决法》第 3 条、第 4 条、第 10 条和第 11 条第 1 款和第 2 款对此作了规定,否定了法院机构审查已受仲裁条款约束的案件的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Klausul Arbitrase dan Kewenangan Absolut Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Praktek Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan
In Indonesia, the settlement of disputes through arbitration is regulated by Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Problem Resolutions. Article 7 Law no. 30 of 1999 stipulates that the parties can agree to an agreement on a dispute that has occurred or will occur between them to be resolved through arbitration with a written agreement agreed upon by the parties. In the selection of arbitral settlement there is a link between the arbitration clause and the selection of settlement through arbitration as well as the implementation of absolute authority and the selection of arbitral institutions in the practice of dispute resolution outside the court. The approach method used is normative juridical. The results of the study state that the choice of arbitration as a dispute resolution is based on a contract in accordance with what is implied in Article 7 and Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 1999, and in this case the parties to the agreement agree to include an arbitration clause, The court is bound by the agreement made by the parties, with the provisions of the article, the absolute competence of arbitration is born when the parties expressly choose to resolve disputes through an arbitration forum where this has been accommodated in Article 3, Article 4, Article 10 and Article 11 paragraphs (1) and (2) in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which negates the authority of court institutions to examine cases that are already bound by an arbitration clause.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信