{"title":"碎片盘中的粉尘压力为何重要","authors":"Elliot M. Lynch, J. Lovell, Antranik A. Sefilian","doi":"10.1093/mnrasl/slae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is a common assumption in the particulate disc community that the pressure in particulate discs is essentially zero and that the disc streamlines follow Keplerian orbits, in the absence of self-gravity or external perturbations. It is also often assumed that the fluid description of particulate discs is not valid in the presence of crossing orbits (e.g. from nonzero free eccentricities). These stem from the misconception that fluid pressure arises due to the (typically rare) collisions between particles and that the velocity of particles in fluids are single-valued in space. In reality, pressure is a statistical property of the particle distribution function which arises precisely because there is a distribution of velocities at a given position. In this letter we demonstrate, with simple examples, that pressure in particulate discs is non-zero and is related to the inclination and free eccentricity distributions of the constituent particles in the discs. This means many common models of debris discs implicitly assume a nonzero, and potentially quite significant, dust pressure. We shall also demonstrate that the bulk motion of the dust is not the same as the particle motion and that the presence of pressure gradients can lead to strong departures from Keplerian motion.","PeriodicalId":18951,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","volume":"79 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why dust pressure matters in debris discs\",\"authors\":\"Elliot M. Lynch, J. Lovell, Antranik A. Sefilian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mnrasl/slae011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There is a common assumption in the particulate disc community that the pressure in particulate discs is essentially zero and that the disc streamlines follow Keplerian orbits, in the absence of self-gravity or external perturbations. It is also often assumed that the fluid description of particulate discs is not valid in the presence of crossing orbits (e.g. from nonzero free eccentricities). These stem from the misconception that fluid pressure arises due to the (typically rare) collisions between particles and that the velocity of particles in fluids are single-valued in space. In reality, pressure is a statistical property of the particle distribution function which arises precisely because there is a distribution of velocities at a given position. In this letter we demonstrate, with simple examples, that pressure in particulate discs is non-zero and is related to the inclination and free eccentricity distributions of the constituent particles in the discs. This means many common models of debris discs implicitly assume a nonzero, and potentially quite significant, dust pressure. We shall also demonstrate that the bulk motion of the dust is not the same as the particle motion and that the presence of pressure gradients can lead to strong departures from Keplerian motion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters\",\"volume\":\"79 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slae011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slae011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
There is a common assumption in the particulate disc community that the pressure in particulate discs is essentially zero and that the disc streamlines follow Keplerian orbits, in the absence of self-gravity or external perturbations. It is also often assumed that the fluid description of particulate discs is not valid in the presence of crossing orbits (e.g. from nonzero free eccentricities). These stem from the misconception that fluid pressure arises due to the (typically rare) collisions between particles and that the velocity of particles in fluids are single-valued in space. In reality, pressure is a statistical property of the particle distribution function which arises precisely because there is a distribution of velocities at a given position. In this letter we demonstrate, with simple examples, that pressure in particulate discs is non-zero and is related to the inclination and free eccentricity distributions of the constituent particles in the discs. This means many common models of debris discs implicitly assume a nonzero, and potentially quite significant, dust pressure. We shall also demonstrate that the bulk motion of the dust is not the same as the particle motion and that the presence of pressure gradients can lead to strong departures from Keplerian motion.
期刊介绍:
For papers that merit urgent publication, MNRAS Letters, the online section of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, publishes short, topical and significant research in all fields of astronomy. Letters should be self-contained and describe the results of an original study whose rapid publication might be expected to have a significant influence on the subsequent development of research in the associated subject area. The 5-page limit must be respected. Authors are required to state their reasons for seeking publication in the form of a Letter when submitting their manuscript.