根据 OIML R76 分析地板尺寸对电子秤偏心率测试误差值的影响

Geston Bakti Muntoha
{"title":"根据 OIML R76 分析地板尺寸对电子秤偏心率测试误差值的影响","authors":"Geston Bakti Muntoha","doi":"10.23960/jtaf.v12i1.14193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of high-intensity non-automatic weighing instruments can cause users to overlook the load's location during weighing. However, electronic non-automatic weighing instruments maintain measurement accuracy regardless of the load's position. This study aims to analyze the effect of load receptor size on error values when testing non-automatic weighing instruments eccentricity using the OIML R-76 recommended method. Testing the eccentricity of electronic non-automatic weighing instruments with the same construction model, load cell, and indicator but different load receptor sizes can affect the non-automatic weighing instruments' error values. The largest error value on Instrument A, with a load floor size of 40x30cm, is -0.025kg at test point 4. On Instrument A, the smallest error value at test points 1, 2, and 5 is -0.005kg. On Instrument B, with a load floor size of 60x50cm, the largest error value at test points 1 and 4 is -0.005kg, respectively. At test points 2-3-5, the smallest error value on Instrument B is 0kg. The average error on Instrument A is -0.01kg, while on Instrument B it is 0kg. The size of the load receptor affects the increase in the error value of a non-automatic weighing instrument, with larger load receptor resulting in greater error values, even if the construction design of the load receptor support is the same.","PeriodicalId":314761,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika","volume":"55 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Pengaruh Ukuran Lantai Muatan Timbangan Terhadap Nilai Error Pada Pengujian Eksentrisitas Timbangan Elektronik Sesuai OIML R76\",\"authors\":\"Geston Bakti Muntoha\",\"doi\":\"10.23960/jtaf.v12i1.14193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of high-intensity non-automatic weighing instruments can cause users to overlook the load's location during weighing. However, electronic non-automatic weighing instruments maintain measurement accuracy regardless of the load's position. This study aims to analyze the effect of load receptor size on error values when testing non-automatic weighing instruments eccentricity using the OIML R-76 recommended method. Testing the eccentricity of electronic non-automatic weighing instruments with the same construction model, load cell, and indicator but different load receptor sizes can affect the non-automatic weighing instruments' error values. The largest error value on Instrument A, with a load floor size of 40x30cm, is -0.025kg at test point 4. On Instrument A, the smallest error value at test points 1, 2, and 5 is -0.005kg. On Instrument B, with a load floor size of 60x50cm, the largest error value at test points 1 and 4 is -0.005kg, respectively. At test points 2-3-5, the smallest error value on Instrument B is 0kg. The average error on Instrument A is -0.01kg, while on Instrument B it is 0kg. The size of the load receptor affects the increase in the error value of a non-automatic weighing instrument, with larger load receptor resulting in greater error values, even if the construction design of the load receptor support is the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika\",\"volume\":\"55 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23960/jtaf.v12i1.14193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/jtaf.v12i1.14193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用高强度非自动称重仪器可能会导致用户在称重时忽略负载的位置。然而,电子非自动称重仪器无论负载的位置如何,都能保持测量精度。本研究旨在分析使用 OIML R-76 推荐方法测试非自动称重仪器偏心率时,负载受体大小对误差值的影响。测试电子非自动称重仪表的偏心率时,如果结构型号、称重传感器和称重显示器相同,但称重传感器尺寸不同,则会影响非自动称重仪表的误差值。称重底板尺寸为 40x30 厘米的仪器 A 在测试点 4 的最大误差值为-0.025 千克。在仪器 A 上,测试点 1、2 和 5 的最小误差值为 -0.005kg。仪器 B 的负载底面尺寸为 60x50cm,测试点 1 和 4 的最大误差值分别为-0.005kg。在 2-3-5 测试点,仪器 B 的最小误差值为 0kg。仪器 A 的平均误差为 -0.01kg,仪器 B 的平均误差为 0kg。荷载托架的大小会影响非自动称重仪器误差值的增加,即使荷载托架支架的结构设计相同,荷载托架越大,误差值越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Pengaruh Ukuran Lantai Muatan Timbangan Terhadap Nilai Error Pada Pengujian Eksentrisitas Timbangan Elektronik Sesuai OIML R76
The use of high-intensity non-automatic weighing instruments can cause users to overlook the load's location during weighing. However, electronic non-automatic weighing instruments maintain measurement accuracy regardless of the load's position. This study aims to analyze the effect of load receptor size on error values when testing non-automatic weighing instruments eccentricity using the OIML R-76 recommended method. Testing the eccentricity of electronic non-automatic weighing instruments with the same construction model, load cell, and indicator but different load receptor sizes can affect the non-automatic weighing instruments' error values. The largest error value on Instrument A, with a load floor size of 40x30cm, is -0.025kg at test point 4. On Instrument A, the smallest error value at test points 1, 2, and 5 is -0.005kg. On Instrument B, with a load floor size of 60x50cm, the largest error value at test points 1 and 4 is -0.005kg, respectively. At test points 2-3-5, the smallest error value on Instrument B is 0kg. The average error on Instrument A is -0.01kg, while on Instrument B it is 0kg. The size of the load receptor affects the increase in the error value of a non-automatic weighing instrument, with larger load receptor resulting in greater error values, even if the construction design of the load receptor support is the same.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信